Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Faculdade de Medicina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul-Aug;74(4):844517. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844517. Epub 2024 May 23.
The escalation of surgeries for high-risk patients in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) lacks evidence on the positive impact of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission and lacks universal criteria for allocation. This study explores the link between postoperative ICU allocation and mortality in high-risk patients within a LMIC. Additionally, it assesses the Ex-Care risk model's utility in guiding postoperative allocation decisions.
A secondary analysis was conducted in a cohort of high-risk surgical patients from a 800-bed university-affiliated teaching hospital in Southern Brazil (July 2017 to January 2020). Inclusion criteria encompassed 1431 inpatients with Ex-Care Model-assessed all-cause postoperative 30-day mortality risk exceeding 5%. The study compared 30-day mortality outcomes between those allocated to the ICU and the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU). Outcomes were also assessed based on Ex-Care risk model classes.
Among 1431 high-risk patients, 250 (17.47%) were directed to the ICU, resulting in 28% in-hospital 30-day mortality, compared to 8.9% in the PACU. However, ICU allocation showed no independent effect on mortality (RR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.68‒1.20). Patients in the highest Ex-Care risk class (Class IV) exhibited a substantial association with mortality (RR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.54-2.90) and were more frequently admitted to the ICU (23.3% vs. 13.1%).
Patients in the highest Ex-Care risk class and those with complications faced elevated mortality risk, irrespective of allocation. Addressing the unmet need for adaptable postoperative care for high-risk patients outside the ICU is crucial in LMICs. Further research is essential to refine criteria and elucidate the utility of risk assessment tools like the Ex-Care model in assisting allocation decisions.
在中低收入国家(LMICs),高危患者手术的升级缺乏 ICU 入住对积极影响的证据,并且缺乏通用的分配标准。本研究探讨了在 LMIC 中高危患者术后 ICU 分配与死亡率之间的联系。此外,它评估了 Ex-Care 风险模型在指导术后分配决策方面的效用。
在巴西南部一家 800 张床位的大学附属教学医院的高危手术患者队列中进行了二次分析(2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月)。纳入标准包括 Ex-Care 模型评估的所有原因术后 30 天死亡率超过 5%的 1431 名住院患者。本研究比较了 ICU 和麻醉后护理单元(PACU)之间的 30 天死亡率结果。还根据 Ex-Care 风险模型类别评估了结果。
在 1431 名高危患者中,有 250 名(17.47%)被分配到 ICU,院内 30 天死亡率为 28%,而 PACU 为 8.9%。然而,ICU 分配对死亡率没有独立影响(RR=0.91;95%CI 0.68-1.20)。处于最高 Ex-Care 风险类别的患者(IV 类)与死亡率有很大关联(RR=2.11;95%CI 1.54-2.90),更频繁地被分配到 ICU(23.3% vs. 13.1%)。
处于最高 Ex-Care 风险类别的患者和有并发症的患者,无论分配与否,都面临着更高的死亡风险。满足 LMIC 中高危患者对 ICU 外适应性术后护理的需求至关重要。进一步的研究对于完善标准和阐明 Ex-Care 等风险评估工具在协助分配决策方面的效用至关重要。