Suppr超能文献

先天性脊柱侧凸的皮节体感诱发电位和皮质体感诱发电位评估。

Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials assessment in congenital scoliosis.

机构信息

Department of neurospinal, Xi'an HongHui Hospital Affiliated of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02579-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the value of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSEPs) and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) in monitoring spinal cord function for patients with congenital scoliosis (CS).

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of patients (n = 102) who underwent DSEP (T2-S1 dermatome), of whom 60 were normal subjects and 62 with congenital scoliosis. The study analyzed the latencies and peaks of N1-L, N1-R, P1-L and P1-R recorded by DSEPs of patients' thoracolumbar dermatomes. To observe the incidence of abnormal DSEPs and SSEPs in CS patients and to analyze the difference in sensitivity and reliability between the two in the examination of scoliosis patients. SPSS 22.0 statistical software package was used to analyze the data, and χ2 test and correlation analysis were used to indicate that the difference was statistically significant, p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Sixty two patients with CS were evaluated with total spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Only 23 patients (37.09%) showed spinal cord malformations in the MRI findings. The DSEP recordings showed a relatively high sensitivity (97.8%) compared to the abnormality rate of SSEPs recordings, and the rates of waveform, latency and amplitude abnormalities were much higher in DSEPs recordings (36.6, 36.3, 24.8%) than in SSEPs recordings (3.2, 22.5, 14.5%). The abnormality rate of DSEP records with and without neurological symptoms was higher than the abnormality rate of SSEP records (100% vs 20, 96.2% vs 44.2%, p<0.05). And in 62 patients with CS, the rate of positive MRI (37.1%) was lower than that recorded by DSEP (79.6% / 57.9%). p < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

DSEPs are more sensitive to microscopic posterior column dysfunction in patients with CS that cannot be detected by either radiology or routine clinical examination. Preoperative DSEPs assessment is recommended as a baseline examination for intraoperative monitoring and comparison with the postoperative situation. DSEPs recording complements the information obtained from routine clinical and radiological evaluation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估皮节体感诱发电位(DSEP)和皮质体感诱发电位(SSEP)在监测先天性脊柱侧凸(CS)患者脊髓功能方面的价值。

方法

本回顾性研究分析了 102 例行 DSEP(T2-S1 皮节)检查的患者的病历,其中 60 例为正常对照,62 例为先天性脊柱侧凸患者。研究分析了患者胸腰椎皮节 DSEP 记录的 N1-L、N1-R、P1-L 和 P1-R 的潜伏期和波峰。观察 CS 患者 DSEP 和 SSEP 的异常发生率,并分析两种方法在脊柱侧凸患者检查中的敏感性和可靠性差异。采用 SPSS 22.0 统计软件包进行数据分析,采用 χ2 检验和相关性分析,p<0.05 表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

62 例 CS 患者行全脊柱磁共振成像(MRI)检查。仅 23 例(37.09%)患者 MRI 结果显示脊髓畸形。与 SSEP 记录的异常率相比,DSEP 记录的敏感性相对较高(97.8%),且 DSEP 记录的波形、潜伏期和振幅异常率(36.6%、36.3%和 24.8%)明显高于 SSEP 记录(3.2%、22.5%和 14.5%)。有神经症状和无神经症状患者的 DSEP 记录异常率高于 SSEP 记录(100%比 20%,96.2%比 44.2%,p<0.05)。在 62 例 CS 患者中,阳性 MRI 率(37.1%)低于 DSEP 记录(79.6%/57.9%),p<0.05。

结论

DSEP 对 CS 患者无法通过影像学或常规临床检查检测到的微小后柱功能障碍更为敏感。建议术前 DSEP 评估作为术中监测的基线检查,并与术后情况进行比较。DSEP 记录补充了常规临床和影像学评估获得的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c003/8845289/215681562764/12883_2022_2579_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验