Tubiana M, Carde P, Burgers J M, Cosset J M, Van Glabbeke M, Somers R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1986 Apr;12(4):503-14. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90057-x.
The results obtained with the various types of treatment in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma are reviewed and the data from the recent EORTC trials are summarized. In patients with Stage I follicular histology, regional radiotherapy (RT) alone gives excellent results. The long-term relapse-free survival (RFS) is high and relapsing patients can be rescued by aggressive combination chemotherapy; initial chemotherapy with CVP improves RFS but not total survival (TS). In patients with Stage I diffuse histology, the long-term survival is less satisfactory. CVP chemotherapy does not improve either RFS or TS; therefore if adjuvant chemotherapy is justified, it should be more aggressive than CVP. In patients with Stage II follicular type, regional radiotherapy alone gives good results. The addition of abdominal bath irradiation to regional RT increases RFS but not TS. After relapse, patients can be rescued by combination chemotherapy. In patients with Stage II diffuse histology, extended RT followed by CVP gives poor results and RT should be combined with more aggressive combination CT; the preliminary results of an integrated alternating regimen being excellent. In patients with Stage III and IV follicular type, the 8 year TS of patients treated with combination CT regimen (CHVP) followed by localized irradiation is approximately 55%, however the indications for the various types of treatment are still unclear. In patients with diffuse Stage III and IV, the results obtained with a combination CT regimen (CHVP) are still unsatisfactory, but are better in patients treated by a more aggressive CT regimen (CHVP-Bleo-VCR). Therefore aggressive CT associated with localized irradiation appears to be the best treatment. Further research should aim to identify the optimal combination CT regimen. In patients with high grade lymphomas who have relapsed the use of bone marrow autografts will be investigated. The present data show that besides histological type and age, the main prognostic factor is total tumor body burden as assessed by clinical stage, number of involved lymph node areas, and bulk of the disease. The study of the biological characteristics of the disease may provide more powerful prognostic indicators.
本文回顾了非霍奇金淋巴瘤采用不同治疗方法所取得的结果,并总结了近期欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)试验的数据。对于I期滤泡性组织学类型的患者,单纯区域放疗(RT)效果极佳。长期无复发生存率(RFS)很高,复发患者可通过积极的联合化疗挽救;采用CVP方案进行初始化疗可提高RFS,但不能提高总生存率(TS)。对于I期弥漫性组织学类型的患者,长期生存率不太理想。CVP化疗既不能提高RFS也不能提高TS;因此,如果辅助化疗合理,应比CVP方案更积极。对于II期滤泡型患者,单纯区域放疗效果良好。区域RT联合腹部浴照射可提高RFS,但不能提高TS。复发后,患者可通过联合化疗挽救。对于II期弥漫性组织学类型的患者,扩大RT后序贯CVP效果不佳,RT应与更积极的联合化疗(CT)联合;综合交替方案的初步结果极佳。对于III期和IV期滤泡型患者,采用联合CT方案(CHVP)治疗后进行局部照射,患者的8年TS约为55%,然而,各种治疗类型的适应证仍不明确。对于弥漫性III期和IV期患者,联合CT方案(CHVP)取得的结果仍不令人满意,但采用更积极的CT方案(CHVP - 博来霉素 - 长春新碱)治疗的患者效果更好。因此,积极的CT联合局部照射似乎是最佳治疗方法。进一步的研究应旨在确定最佳的联合CT方案。对于复发的高级别淋巴瘤患者,将研究自体骨髓移植的应用。目前的数据表明,除了组织学类型和年龄外,主要的预后因素是根据临床分期、受累淋巴结区域数量和疾病体积评估的肿瘤总体负荷。对该疾病生物学特性的研究可能会提供更有力的预后指标。