• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整形外科学研究中的倾向评分:分析与最佳实践指南

Propensity Scoring in Plastic Surgery Research: An Analysis and Best Practice Guide.

作者信息

Chu Jacqueline J, Shamsunder Meghana G, Yin Shen, Rubenstein Robyn R, Slutsky Hanna, Fischer John P, Nelson Jonas A

机构信息

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, N.Y.

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Feb 9;10(2):e4003. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004003. eCollection 2022 Feb.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000004003
PMID:35169516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8830836/
Abstract

Randomized controlled trials, though considered the gold standard in clinical research, are often not feasible in plastic surgery research. Instead, researchers rely heavily on observational studies, leading to potential issues with confounding and selection bias. Propensity scoring-a statistical technique that estimates a patient's likelihood of having received the exposure of interest-can improve the comparability of study groups by either guiding the selection of study participants or generating a covariate that can be adjusted for in multivariate analyses. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive review of research articles published in three major plastic surgery journals (, , and ) to determine the utilization of propensity scoring methods in plastic surgery research from August 2018 to August 2020. We found that propensity scoring was used in only eight (0.8%) of 971 research articles, none of which fully reported all components of their propensity scoring methodology. We provide a brief overview of propensity score techniques and recommend guidelines for accurate reporting of propensity scoring methods for plastic surgery research. Improved understanding of propensity scoring may encourage plastic surgery researchers to incorporate the method in their own work and improve plastic surgeons' ability to understand and analyze future research studies that utilize propensity score methods.

摘要

随机对照试验虽被视为临床研究的金标准,但在整形手术研究中往往不可行。相反,研究人员严重依赖观察性研究,这导致了混杂和选择偏倚等潜在问题。倾向评分——一种估计患者接受感兴趣暴露的可能性的统计技术——可以通过指导研究参与者的选择或生成一个可在多变量分析中进行调整的协变量,来提高研究组之间的可比性。在本研究中,我们对在三本主要整形外科学术期刊(《 》、《 》和《 》)上发表的研究文章进行了全面综述,以确定2018年8月至2020年8月期间整形手术研究中倾向评分方法的使用情况。我们发现,在971篇研究文章中,只有8篇(0.8%)使用了倾向评分,其中没有一篇完整报告其倾向评分方法的所有组成部分。我们简要概述了倾向评分技术,并推荐了整形手术研究中倾向评分方法准确报告的指南。对倾向评分的更好理解可能会鼓励整形手术研究人员在自己的工作中采用该方法,并提高整形外科医生理解和分析未来使用倾向评分方法的研究的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/0c7994712392/gox-10-e4003-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/284caa92e295/gox-10-e4003-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/ee3daf8ae577/gox-10-e4003-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/14531eb73367/gox-10-e4003-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/2d96d74f05ac/gox-10-e4003-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/453ac860d1c8/gox-10-e4003-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/0c7994712392/gox-10-e4003-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/284caa92e295/gox-10-e4003-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/ee3daf8ae577/gox-10-e4003-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/14531eb73367/gox-10-e4003-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/2d96d74f05ac/gox-10-e4003-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/453ac860d1c8/gox-10-e4003-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56d3/8830836/0c7994712392/gox-10-e4003-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Propensity Scoring in Plastic Surgery Research: An Analysis and Best Practice Guide.整形外科学研究中的倾向评分:分析与最佳实践指南
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Feb 9;10(2):e4003. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004003. eCollection 2022 Feb.
2
Journal impact factor versus the evidence level of articles published in plastic surgery journals.期刊影响因子与整形外科学杂志发表文章的证据水平的关系。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun;133(6):1502-1507. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000214.
3
Level of evidence in plastic surgery research.整形外科学研究中的证据水平。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):974-980. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200af74.
4
A detailed analysis of level I evidence (randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses) in five plastic surgery journals to date: 1978 to 2009.对五个整形外科学杂志截至目前(1978 年至 2009 年)的一级证据(随机对照试验和荟萃分析)进行详细分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1774-1778. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181efa201.
5
International and Geographic Trends in Gender Authorship within Plastic Surgery.整形外科学术文献中的性别作者署名的国际和地域趋势
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Oct;144(4):1010-1016. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006076.
6
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Association between research sponsorship and study outcome in plastic surgery literature.整形外科学术文献中研究资助与研究结果之间的关联。
Ann Plast Surg. 2009 Dec;63(6):661-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181951917.
9
The Effect of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Plastic Surgery Literature.整形外科学术文献中经济利益冲突的影响
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76 Suppl 4:S357-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000672.
10
Quality of clinical studies in aesthetic surgery journals: a 10-year review.美容外科期刊临床研究的质量:十年回顾
Aesthet Surg J. 2009 Mar-Apr;29(2):144-7; discussion 147-9. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.12.007.

引用本文的文献

1
Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.保乳治疗与乳腺癌根治术后乳房重建的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):8030-8039. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15294-w. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
The Impact of Lymphedema on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction: A Preliminary Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.淋巴水肿对乳房重建后患者报告结局的影响:初步倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3061-3071. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12994-z. Epub 2023 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Burn Survivors Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery in the Rehabilitative Period.评价康复期行重建手术的烧伤幸存者的患者报告结局。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jul;146(1):171-182. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006909.
2
Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life after Four Common Surgical Treatment Options for Breast Cancer and the Effect of Complications: A Retrospective Patient-Reported Survey among 1871 Patients.长期健康相关生活质量与四种常见乳腺癌手术治疗方案及并发症的关系:一项回顾性患者报告调查,共纳入 1871 例患者。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jul;146(1):1-13. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006887.
3
A review of the use of propensity score diagnostics in papers published in high-ranking medical journals.
一篇关于在高排名医学期刊发表的论文中使用倾向评分诊断的综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 27;20(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00994-0.
4
Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting to address confounding by indication in comparative effectiveness research of oral anticoagulants.倾向评分匹配和治疗反概率加权法解决口服抗凝药物比较有效性研究中的指示性混杂
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Jun;9(9):603-614. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0013. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
5
Outpatient Reduction Mammaplasty Offers Significantly Lower Costs with Comparable Outcomes: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of 18,780 Cases.门诊缩乳术具有显著更低的成本和相当的效果:一项基于倾向评分匹配的 18780 例病例分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):499e-506e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006545.
6
The Evolution of Breast Satisfaction and Well-Being after Breast Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Comparison to the Norm.乳腺癌患者乳房满意度和幸福感的演变:与常态的倾向匹配比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):595-604. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006535.
7
The Risk of Complications after Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients Taking Acetylsalicylic Acid as Platelet Inhibition: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.服用乙酰水杨酸进行血小板抑制的患者行腕管松解术后发生并发症的风险:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):360e-367e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006465.
8
Use of Propensity Score Methodology in Contemporary High-Impact Surgical Literature.应用倾向评分法于当代高影响力外科文献中。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jan;230(1):101-112.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
Long-term Patient-reported Outcomes Following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: An 8-year Examination of 3268 Patients.乳腺癌根治术后患者长期报告结局:3268 例患者 8 年的随访。
Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):473-483. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003467.
10
Role of Postoperative Anticoagulation in Predicting Digit Replantation and Revascularization Failure: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.术后抗凝在预测断指再植和血管再通失败中的作用:一项倾向匹配队列研究。
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Nov;83(5):542-547. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001848.