• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Evolution of Breast Satisfaction and Well-Being after Breast Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Comparison to the Norm.乳腺癌患者乳房满意度和幸福感的演变:与常态的倾向匹配比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):595-604. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006535.
2
Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.乳腺癌根治术后患者长期报告的结局。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):891-899. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1677.
3
Patient-Reported Outcomes 1 Year After Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.即刻乳房重建术后1年患者报告的结局:乳房切除术重建结局联盟研究结果
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 1;35(22):2499-2506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9561. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
4
Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life after Four Common Surgical Treatment Options for Breast Cancer and the Effect of Complications: A Retrospective Patient-Reported Survey among 1871 Patients.长期健康相关生活质量与四种常见乳腺癌手术治疗方案及并发症的关系:一项回顾性患者报告调查,共纳入 1871 例患者。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jul;146(1):1-13. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006887.
5
Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.乳腺癌与乳房重建:解读BREAST-Q的规范数据
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1046e-1055e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003241.
6
The Impact of Lymphedema on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction: A Preliminary Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.淋巴水肿对乳房重建后患者报告结局的影响:初步倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3061-3071. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12994-z. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
7
Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life after breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire.采用 BREAST-Q 问卷评估保乳手术、乳房切除术和乳房重建后的患者报告结局和生活质量。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Oct;207(3):641-648. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07396-6. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
8
Outcome of Quality of Life for Women Undergoing Autologous versus Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction following Mastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳房切除术患者自体与同种异体乳房重建术后生活质量结局比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 May;145(5):1109-1123. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006720.
9
A comparison of patient satisfaction (using the BREAST-Q questionnaire) with bilateral breast reconstruction following risk-reducing or therapeutic mastectomy.使用BREAST-Q问卷对降低风险或治疗性乳房切除术后双侧乳房重建患者满意度的比较。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Sep;71(9):1324-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Differences between Breast Cancer Reconstruction and Institutionally Established Normative Data Using the BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module: A Comparative Study.使用 BREAST-Q 重建模块比较乳腺癌重建与机构设定的规范数据:一项比较研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jun;145(6):1371-1379. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006810.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Skin Paddle Morphology after Autologous Breast Reconstruction.自体乳房重建术后皮瓣形态的变化
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Sep 19;12(9):e6175. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006175. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life after breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction assessed using the BREAST-Q questionnaire.采用 BREAST-Q 问卷评估保乳手术、乳房切除术和乳房重建后的患者报告结局和生活质量。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Oct;207(3):641-648. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07396-6. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
Long-Term Patient-Reported Arm Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors.乳腺癌幸存者的长期患者报告手臂症状。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1623-1633. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14711-w. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
4
Minimal Scar Autologous Breast Reconstruction with Skin-sparing Mastectomy.保留皮肤的乳房切除术式的最小瘢痕自体乳房重建术
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Aug 7;11(8):e5176. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005176. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients.患者评估的大学医院的乳房再造服务质量。
Acta Cir Bras. 2023 May 1;38:e381223. doi: 10.1590/acb381223. eCollection 2023.
6
Trends in emotional functioning and psychosocial wellbeing in breast cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study using patient-reported outcome measures.乳腺癌幸存者情绪功能和心理社会健康的趋势:使用患者报告结局测量的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Mar 30;23(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02243-0.
7
Defining the Value of Breast Reconstruction Surgeons: Quantifying Clinical Encounter and Operative Volume at an Academic Center.界定乳房重建外科医生的价值:量化学术中心的临床诊疗量与手术量
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Dec 12;10(12):e4692. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004692. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making through a shared decision-making intervention (A231701CD): protocol for a cluster randomised clinical trial.通过一项共享决策干预措施增加社会经济处境不利的乳腺癌患者参与手术决策的程度(A231701CD):一项群组随机临床试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 17;12(11):e063895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063895.
9
Community collaboration to improve access and outcomes in breast cancer reconstruction: protocol for a mixed-methods qualitative research study.社区协作以改善乳腺癌重建的可及性和结果:一项混合方法定性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 7;12(11):e064121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064121.
10
Propensity Scoring in Plastic Surgery Research: An Analysis and Best Practice Guide.整形外科学研究中的倾向评分:分析与最佳实践指南
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Feb 9;10(2):e4003. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004003. eCollection 2022 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life after Breast Reconstruction: Comparing 4 Different Methods of Reconstruction.乳房重建术后与健康相关的长期生活质量:比较四种不同的重建方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jun 21;5(6):e1316. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001316. eCollection 2017 Jun.
2
Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.乳腺癌与乳房重建:解读BREAST-Q的规范数据
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1046e-1055e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003241.
3
Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: A case-controlled cohort study.乳腺癌全乳切除术后有或无乳房重建与保乳手术的生活质量:一项病例对照队列研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Sep;69(9):1184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Choice for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.选择对侧预防性乳房切除术的患者报告结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 1;34(13):1518-27. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5427. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
5
The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.外科研究中的BREAST-Q:2009 - 2015年文献综述
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Feb;69(2):149-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
6
The quality-of-life benefits of breast reconstruction do not diminish with age.乳房重建对生活质量的益处不会随着年龄增长而减少。
J Surg Oncol. 2015 May;111(6):663-8. doi: 10.1002/jso.23864. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
7
Which breast is the best? Successful autologous or alloplastic breast reconstruction: patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes.哪种乳房是最好的?自体或异体乳房重建手术的成功:患者报告的生活质量结果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000804.
8
A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures.一份关于乳腺癌手术满意度的全国性概况。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):361-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4246-9. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
9
Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy: Patient Satisfaction and Decision Making.乳房切除术后乳房重建:患者满意度与决策制定
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76(6):640-4. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000242.
10
Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England.英国全国乳房切除术和乳房重建手术比较审计结果。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Oct;67(10):1333-44. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 May 14.

乳腺癌患者乳房满意度和幸福感的演变:与常态的倾向匹配比较。

The Evolution of Breast Satisfaction and Well-Being after Breast Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Comparison to the Norm.

机构信息

From the Divisions of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center; the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University; the Division of Plastic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, Depart PRS-D-19-00046 ment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Mar;145(3):595-604. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006535.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006535
PMID:32097289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8917794/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer survival continues to improve, with women living longer after treatment. It is not well understood how long-term satisfaction and well-being differ following treatment or how types of reconstruction differ when compared to the norm.

METHODS

In a propensity-matched sample, the authors compared patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer patients at various time intervals from surgery with normative BREAST-Q data. All data were obtained using the Army of Women, an online community fostering breast cancer research. Breast cancer patients were stratified by surgical treatment and reconstruction type. Regression lines were estimated and differences in slope tested between cancer patients and noncancer controls.

RESULTS

The authors compared normative (n = 922) and breast cancer (n = 4343) cohorts in a propensity-matched analysis. Among the breast cancer patients, 49.4 percent underwent lumpectomy, 17.0 percent underwent mastectomy, 21.7 percent underwent implant reconstruction, and 11.9 percent underwent autologous reconstruction. Median time since surgery was 4.7 years, with 21.1 percent more than 10 years after surgery. At the time of survey, breast cancer patients reported higher Satisfaction with Breasts and Psychosocial Well-being scores compared to noncancer controls (p < 0.01), with the cohorts undergoing lumpectomy and autologous reconstruction both reporting higher scores than the normative controls. After mastectomy, scores averaged lower than the noncancer controls, but improved over time. However, all breast cancer groups reported significantly lower Physical Well-being scores than the noncancer cohort (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer patients undergoing lumpectomy or autologous reconstruction reported higher psychosocial well-being compared to noncancer controls. These differences were influenced both by time since treatment and by choice of surgical procedure.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌患者的存活率持续提高,治疗后生存时间延长。但目前尚不清楚治疗后患者的长期满意度和幸福感有何差异,也不清楚与常规治疗相比,不同类型的重建术有何差异。

方法

在倾向匹配样本中,作者比较了不同时间间隔(从手术开始)的乳腺癌患者和 BREAST-Q 标准数据的患者报告结果。所有数据均来自于妇女军队(一个促进乳腺癌研究的在线社区)。根据手术治疗和重建类型对乳腺癌患者进行分层。估计回归线,并检验癌症患者和非癌症对照之间斜率的差异。

结果

作者在倾向匹配分析中比较了标准(n=922)和乳腺癌(n=4343)队列。在乳腺癌患者中,49.4%接受了保乳手术,17.0%接受了乳房切除术,21.7%接受了植入物重建,11.9%接受了自体组织重建。中位手术时间为 4.7 年,21.1%的患者手术后超过 10 年。在调查时,乳腺癌患者报告的乳房满意度和心理社会幸福感评分高于非癌症对照组(p<0.01),接受保乳手术和自体组织重建的患者评分均高于标准对照组。乳房切除术后,评分平均低于非癌症对照组,但随时间推移而改善。然而,所有乳腺癌组的身体幸福感评分均明显低于非癌症组(均 p<0.01)。

结论

接受保乳手术或自体组织重建的乳腺癌患者报告的心理社会幸福感高于非癌症对照组。这些差异既受治疗后时间的影响,也受手术程序选择的影响。