Williams Thomas C, Wastnedge Elizabeth, McAllister Gina, Bhatia Ramya, Cuschieri Kate, Kefala Kallirroi, Hamilton Fiona, Johannessen Ingólfur, Laurenson Ian F, Shepherd Jill, Stewart Alistair, Waters Donald, Wise Helen, Templeton Kate E
IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Feb 1;5:254. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16342.2. eCollection 2020.
This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) testing of upper respiratory tract samples from hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), compared to the gold standard of a clinical diagnosis. All RT-PCR testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in NHS Lothian, Scotland, United Kingdom between the 7 of February and 19 April 2020 (inclusive) was reviewed, and hospitalised patients were identified. All upper respiratory tract RT-PCR tests were analysed for each patient to determine the sequence of negative and positive results. For those who were tested twice or more but never received a positive result, case records were reviewed, and a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 allocated based on clinical features, discharge diagnosis, and radiology and haematology results. For those who had a negative RT-PCR test but a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, respiratory samples were retested using a multiplex respiratory panel, a second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, and a human RNase P control. Compared to the gold standard of a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, the sensitivity of a single upper respiratory tract RT-PCR for COVID-19 was 82.2% (95% confidence interval 79.0-85.1%). The sensitivity of two upper respiratory tract RT-PCR tests increased sensitivity to 90.6% (CI 88.0-92.7%). A further 2.2% and 0.9% of patients who received a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 were positive on a third and fourth test; this may be an underestimate of the value of further testing as the majority of patients 93.0% (2999/3226) only had one or two RT-PCR tests. The sensitivity of a single RT-PCR test of upper respiratory tract samples in hospitalised patients is 82.2%. Sensitivity increases to 90.6% when patients are tested twice. A proportion of cases with clinically defined COVID-19 never test positive on RT-PCR despite repeat testing.
本研究旨在确定对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者的上呼吸道样本进行逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测相对于临床诊断金标准的敏感性和特异性。对2020年2月7日至4月19日(含)期间英国苏格兰NHS Lothian地区所有针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的RT-PCR检测进行了回顾,并确定了住院患者。对每位患者的所有上呼吸道RT-PCR检测结果进行分析,以确定阴性和阳性结果的顺序。对于那些接受了两次或更多次检测但从未得到阳性结果的患者,查阅病例记录,并根据临床特征、出院诊断以及放射学和血液学结果对COVID-19进行临床诊断。对于那些RT-PCR检测为阴性但临床诊断为COVID-19的患者,使用多重呼吸道检测板、第二次SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测以及人核糖核酸酶P对照对呼吸道样本进行重新检测。与COVID-19临床诊断的金标准相比,单次上呼吸道RT-PCR检测对COVID-19的敏感性为82.2%(95%置信区间79.0 - 85.1%)。两次上呼吸道RT-PCR检测的敏感性将敏感性提高到90.6%(置信区间88.0 - 92.7%)。在接受COVID-19临床诊断的患者中,另外有2.2%和0.9%的患者在第三次和第四次检测时呈阳性;这可能低估了进一步检测的价值,因为大多数患者(93.0%,2999/3226)仅进行了一两次RT-PCR检测。住院患者上呼吸道样本单次RT-PCR检测的敏感性为82.2%。当患者接受两次检测时,敏感性提高到90.6%。一部分临床确诊为COVID-19的病例尽管反复检测,RT-PCR检测仍从未呈阳性。