Suppr超能文献

住院患者中SARS-CoV-2上呼吸道样本RT-PCR检测的敏感性:一项回顾性队列研究。

Sensitivity of RT-PCR testing of upper respiratory tract samples for SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalised patients: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Williams Thomas C, Wastnedge Elizabeth, McAllister Gina, Bhatia Ramya, Cuschieri Kate, Kefala Kallirroi, Hamilton Fiona, Johannessen Ingólfur, Laurenson Ian F, Shepherd Jill, Stewart Alistair, Waters Donald, Wise Helen, Templeton Kate E

机构信息

IGMM, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Department of Clinical Microbiology & Virology, Directorate of Laboratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Feb 1;5:254. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16342.2. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) testing of upper respiratory tract samples from hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), compared to the gold standard of a clinical diagnosis. All RT-PCR testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in NHS Lothian, Scotland, United Kingdom between the 7 of February and 19 April 2020 (inclusive) was reviewed, and hospitalised patients were identified. All upper respiratory tract RT-PCR tests were analysed for each patient to determine the sequence of negative and positive results. For those who were tested twice or more but never received a positive result, case records were reviewed, and a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 allocated based on clinical features, discharge diagnosis, and radiology and haematology results. For those who had a negative RT-PCR test but a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, respiratory samples were retested using a multiplex respiratory panel, a second SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay, and a human RNase P control. Compared to the gold standard of a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, the sensitivity of a single upper respiratory tract RT-PCR for COVID-19 was 82.2% (95% confidence interval 79.0-85.1%).   The sensitivity of two upper respiratory tract RT-PCR tests increased sensitivity to 90.6% (CI 88.0-92.7%). A further 2.2% and 0.9% of patients who received a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 were positive on a third and fourth test; this may be an underestimate of the value of further testing as the majority of patients 93.0% (2999/3226) only had one or two RT-PCR tests. The sensitivity of a single RT-PCR test of upper respiratory tract samples in hospitalised patients is 82.2%. Sensitivity increases to 90.6% when patients are tested twice.  A proportion of cases with clinically defined COVID-19 never test positive on RT-PCR despite repeat testing.

摘要

本研究旨在确定对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)住院患者的上呼吸道样本进行逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测相对于临床诊断金标准的敏感性和特异性。对2020年2月7日至4月19日(含)期间英国苏格兰NHS Lothian地区所有针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的RT-PCR检测进行了回顾,并确定了住院患者。对每位患者的所有上呼吸道RT-PCR检测结果进行分析,以确定阴性和阳性结果的顺序。对于那些接受了两次或更多次检测但从未得到阳性结果的患者,查阅病例记录,并根据临床特征、出院诊断以及放射学和血液学结果对COVID-19进行临床诊断。对于那些RT-PCR检测为阴性但临床诊断为COVID-19的患者,使用多重呼吸道检测板、第二次SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR检测以及人核糖核酸酶P对照对呼吸道样本进行重新检测。与COVID-19临床诊断的金标准相比,单次上呼吸道RT-PCR检测对COVID-19的敏感性为82.2%(95%置信区间79.0 - 85.1%)。两次上呼吸道RT-PCR检测的敏感性将敏感性提高到90.6%(置信区间88.0 - 92.7%)。在接受COVID-19临床诊断的患者中,另外有2.2%和0.9%的患者在第三次和第四次检测时呈阳性;这可能低估了进一步检测的价值,因为大多数患者(93.0%,2999/3226)仅进行了一两次RT-PCR检测。住院患者上呼吸道样本单次RT-PCR检测的敏感性为82.2%。当患者接受两次检测时,敏感性提高到90.6%。一部分临床确诊为COVID-19的病例尽管反复检测,RT-PCR检测仍从未呈阳性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f55d/8815011/050dc6d04c8a/wellcomeopenres-5-19487-g0000.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验