• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 ISUP 分级分组≤2 的前列腺癌患者从活检到前列腺切除术的病理升级相关的临床病理因素。

Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy in patients with ISUP grade group ≤2 prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.

出版信息

Asian J Androl. 2022 Sep-Oct;24(5):487-493. doi: 10.4103/aja2021108.

DOI:10.4103/aja2021108
PMID:35170453
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9491045/
Abstract

We performed this study to investigate pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy and clinicopathological factors associated with grade group (GG) upgrading in patients with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) GG 1 and 2 prostate cancer (PCa) in a Chinese cohort. We included patients diagnosed with PCa with ISUP GG 1 and 2 at biopsy, who underwent RP at our institution. Pre- and postoperative clinical variables were examined. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent factors associated with GG upgrading. Patients in GG upgraded group had higher total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA; median: 14.43 ng ml vs 10.52 ng ml, P = 0.001) and PSA density (PSAD; median: 0.45 ng ml vs 0.27 ng ml, P < 0.001) than those in GG nonupgraded group. Patients in upgraded group had a higher ratio for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score >3 (86.4% vs 67.9%, P < 0.001). Those with GG 1 in biopsy were more likely to experience GG upgrading after RP than those with GG 2 (71 vs 54, P = 0.016). Independent preoperative factors predicting GG upgrading were PI-RADS score >3 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.471, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.132-5.393; P = 0.023), higher PSAD (P = 0.001), and GG in biopsy (OR: 0.241, 95% CI: 0.123-0.471; P < 0.001). The histopathological analyses of RP specimens revealed that perineural invasion (PNI; OR: 1.839, 95% CI: 1.027-3.490; P = 0.041) was identified as an independent factor associated with GG upgrading. Our results revealed that GG in the biopsy, PSAD, PI-RADS score >3, and PNI were independent factors of GG upgrading. These factors should be considered for patients with ISUP grade ≤2 PCa.

摘要

我们进行了这项研究,旨在探讨中国人群中国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)分级 1 和 2 前列腺癌(PCa)患者从活检到前列腺切除术的病理升级以及与分级组(GG)升级相关的临床病理因素。我们纳入了在我院接受 RP 治疗的经活检诊断为 ISUP GG 1 和 2 PCa 的患者。检查了术前和术后的临床变量。进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与 GG 升级相关的独立因素。GG 升级组的患者总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA;中位数:14.43ng/ml 比 10.52ng/ml,P=0.001)和 PSA 密度(PSAD;中位数:0.45ng/ml 比 0.27ng/ml,P<0.001)均高于 GG 非升级组。升级组患者前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分>3 的比例更高(86.4%比 67.9%,P<0.001)。活检时 GG 1 的患者比 GG 2 的患者更有可能在 RP 后经历 GG 升级(71 比 54,P=0.016)。预测 GG 升级的独立术前因素包括 PI-RADS 评分>3(优势比[OR]:2.471,95%置信区间[CI]:1.132-5.393;P=0.023)、较高的 PSAD(P=0.001)和活检时的 GG(OR:0.241,95%CI:0.123-0.471;P<0.001)。RP 标本的组织病理学分析显示,神经周围侵犯(PNI;OR:1.839,95%CI:1.027-3.490;P=0.041)是与 GG 升级相关的独立因素。我们的结果表明,活检中的 GG、PSAD、PI-RADS 评分>3 和 PNI 是 GG 升级的独立因素。对于 ISUP 分级≤2 PCa 的患者,应考虑这些因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/9491045/8972c14a16b3/AJA-24-487-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/9491045/8972c14a16b3/AJA-24-487-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8fa/9491045/8972c14a16b3/AJA-24-487-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy in patients with ISUP grade group ≤2 prostate cancer.与 ISUP 分级分组≤2 的前列腺癌患者从活检到前列腺切除术的病理升级相关的临床病理因素。
Asian J Androl. 2022 Sep-Oct;24(5):487-493. doi: 10.4103/aja2021108.
2
Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.前列腺健康指数在预测前列腺根治性切除术后 Gleason 评分升级和高危前列腺癌中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 31;11(1):17447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96993-2.
3
PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像测量的PI-RADS v2和前列腺周围脂肪能够预测活检Gleason评分为3+3的前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后病理分级的提升。
Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;52(5-6):333-339. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1545799.
4
[Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer].[前列腺影像报告和数据系统评分与前列腺癌病理结果的相关性分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 15;100(34):2663-2668. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200523-01626.
5
The Impact of Visible Tumor (PI-RADS ≥ 3) on Upgrading and Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Low Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Biopsy Core Based Analysis.低危前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术中可见肿瘤(PI-RADS≥3)对病理升级及不良病理结果的影响:基于活检核心的分析
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Feb;20(1):e61-e67. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.09.007. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
6
The role of PSMA PET/CT to predict upgrading in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for ISUP grade group 1 prostate cancer.PSMA PET/CT 在预测 ISUP 分级 1 组前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术后升级中的作用。
Prostate. 2024 Jan;84(1):32-38. doi: 10.1002/pros.24621. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
7
MRI-based PI-RADS score predicts ISUP upgrading and adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy ISUP 1 prostate cancer.基于 MRI 的 PI-RADS 评分可预测活检 ISUP1 前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后 ISUP 升级和不良病理。
Can J Urol. 2024 Aug;31(4):11955-11962.
8
Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer.活检前列腺内慢性炎症预示着低级别前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后不良病理。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(10):793.e19-793.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
9
[Establishment and evaluation of a model for predicting ISUP pathological grade≥2 before radical prostatectomy].[前列腺癌根治术前预测国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)病理分级≥2的模型的建立与评估]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Dec 7;101(45):3754-3759. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20210824-01915.
10
Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.在 MRI 靶向活检诊断为 IUSP 1-2 前列腺癌的患者中,根治性前列腺切除术后不良病理的风险和预测因素:一项多中心分析。
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):427-434. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04236-4. Epub 2022 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishing a model predicting Gleason grade group upgrading in prostate cancer.建立预测前列腺癌Gleason分级组升级的模型。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1378-1387. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-155. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
2
The prognostic value of F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in predicting pathological upgrading of newly diagnosed prostate cancer from systematic biopsy to radical prostatectomy.F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT在预测新诊断前列腺癌从系统活检到根治性前列腺切除术的病理升级方面的预后价值。
Front Oncol. 2023 May 10;13:1169189. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1169189. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of prostate specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer.使用前列腺特异性抗原密度预测有临床意义的前列腺癌。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 17;10(1):20015. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76786-9.
2
Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4.多参数磁共振成像在预测 Gleason 评分 3+4 前列腺癌术后 Gleason 评分升级中的作用。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):1825-1830. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03421-7. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?
预测 Gleason 评分 3+4 前列腺癌中的病理性升级:哪些患者适合主动监测?
Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Jul;61(4):405-410. doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.4.405. Epub 2020 May 25.
4
Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of High Grade Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.磁共振成像在金丝雀前列腺主动监测研究中检测高级别癌症的应用。
J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):701-706. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001088. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Investigating association of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy with Gleason score upgrading at prostatectomy: A multi-institutional analysis.探讨前列腺穿刺活检中神经周围侵犯与前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的相关性:一项多机构分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(10):3383-3389. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2920. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
6
Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the risk stratification of men with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer on active surveillance.多参数磁共振成像在主动监测中对 1 级前列腺癌男性进行风险分层的作用。
BJU Int. 2020 Jun;125(6):861-866. doi: 10.1111/bju.15033. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
7
The clinical predictive factors and postoperative histopathological parameters associated with upgrading after radical prostatectomy: A contemporary analysis with grade groups.根治性前列腺切除术后与升级相关的临床预测因素和术后组织病理学参数:基于分级组的当代分析。
Prostate. 2020 Feb;80(2):225-234. doi: 10.1002/pros.23936. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
8
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.前列腺磁共振成像联合或不联合磁共振成像靶向活检与系统活检用于前列腺癌检测的效果:一项 Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):78-94. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.023. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
9
The Perineural Invasion Paradox: Is Perineural Invasion an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Biochemical Recurrence Risk in Patients With pT2N0R0 Prostate Cancer? A Multi-Institutional Study.神经周围浸润悖论:神经周围浸润是pT2N0R0前列腺癌患者生化复发风险的独立预后指标吗?一项多机构研究。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep 19;4(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.006. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.
10
Pathological upgrading at radical prostatectomy for patients with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: implications of confirmatory testing for patients considering active surveillance.前列腺癌 1 级患者根治性前列腺切除术后的病理性升级:对考虑主动监测的患者进行确认性检测的意义。
BJU Int. 2019 May;123(5):846-853. doi: 10.1111/bju.14554. Epub 2018 Oct 15.