• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测 Gleason 评分 3+4 前列腺癌中的病理性升级:哪些患者适合主动监测?

Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?

机构信息

Department of Urology, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh, Viet Nam.

Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Jul;61(4):405-410. doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.4.405. Epub 2020 May 25.

DOI:10.4111/icu.2020.61.4.405
PMID:32665997
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7329648/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Whether active surveillance (AS) can be safely extended to patients with Gleason score (GS) 3+4 prostate cancer is highly debated. We examined the incidence and predictors of upgrading among patients with GS 3+4 disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study involved 377 patients with biopsy GS 3+4 who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP) from 2014 to 2018 at a single institution. We analyzed the rate of GS upgrading and used logistic regression to determine the predictors of upgrading.

RESULTS

A total of 168 (44.6%) patients with GS 3+4 experienced an upgrade in GS. In multivariable analysis, advanced age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD) and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score were significant predictors of GS upgrading. When structured into a predictive model that included age ≥65 years, PSA ≥7.7 ng/mL, PSAD ≥0.475 ng/mL and PI-RADS v2 score 4-5, the probability of GS upgrading ranged from 36.4% to 65.7% when one to four of these factors were included.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients with GS 3+4 prostate cancer were upgraded after RP. However, according to our model combining clinical and imaging predictors, patients with a low risk of GS upgrading may be eligible candidates for AS.

摘要

目的

是否可以安全地将主动监测(AS)扩展到 Gleason 评分(GS)为 3+4 的前列腺癌患者,这一问题存在广泛争议。本研究旨在探讨 GS 3+4 疾病患者中升级的发生率和预测因素。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了 2014 年至 2018 年期间在一家医疗机构接受机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的 377 例 GS 3+4 活检患者。我们分析了 GS 升级的发生率,并使用逻辑回归确定了升级的预测因素。

结果

共有 168 例(44.6%)GS 3+4 患者的 GS 发生升级。多变量分析显示,高龄、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平、PSA 密度(PSAD)和前列腺影像报告和数据系统版本 2(PI-RADS v2)评分是 GS 升级的显著预测因素。当将年龄≥65 岁、PSA≥7.7ng/ml、PSAD≥0.475ng/ml 和 PI-RADS v2 评分 4-5 等因素纳入预测模型时,当包含 1-4 个这些因素时,GS 升级的概率从 36.4%到 65.7%不等。

结论

相当一部分 GS 3+4 前列腺癌患者在 RP 后发生升级。然而,根据我们的模型,将临床和影像学预测因素相结合,低 GS 升级风险的患者可能有资格接受 AS。

相似文献

1
Prediction of pathologic upgrading in Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancer: Who is a candidate for active surveillance?预测 Gleason 评分 3+4 前列腺癌中的病理性升级:哪些患者适合主动监测?
Investig Clin Urol. 2020 Jul;61(4):405-410. doi: 10.4111/icu.2020.61.4.405. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4.多参数磁共振成像在预测 Gleason 评分 3+4 前列腺癌术后 Gleason 评分升级中的作用。
World J Urol. 2021 Jun;39(6):1825-1830. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03421-7. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.PI-RADS v2 在预测经活检证实的 Gleason 评分 6 级前列腺癌升级中的作用。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Clinical and pathologic predictors of Gleason sum upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy: results from a single institution series.根治性前列腺切除术后 Gleason 评分升级的临床和病理预测因素:单机构系列研究结果。
Urol Oncol. 2011 Sep-Oct;29(5):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Oct 17.
5
PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像测量的PI-RADS v2和前列腺周围脂肪能够预测活检Gleason评分为3+3的前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后病理分级的提升。
Scand J Urol. 2018 Oct-Dec;52(5-6):333-339. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1545799.
6
Prostate-specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL: A predictor of degree of upgrading to ≥8 among patients with biopsy Gleason score 6.前列腺特异性抗原 10-20ng/mL:预测活检 Gleason 评分 6 患者升级至≥8 的程度的指标。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 Mar;58(2):90-97. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.2.90. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
7
Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.Gleason 评分 3+4“有利中危”前列腺癌的不良疾病特征:对主动监测的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.043. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
8
Risk of Gleason Score 3+4=7 prostate cancer upgrading at radical prostatectomy is significantly reduced by targeted versus standard biopsy.与标准活检相比,靶向活检可显著降低根治性前列腺切除术中 Gleason 评分 3+4=7 的前列腺癌升级风险。
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Jun;72(3):360-368. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03367-8. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
9
Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.基于人群的研究:预测前列腺癌 Gleason6 评分患者主动监测不良病理的因素。
J Urol. 2014 Feb;191(2):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.09.034. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
10
Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.基于当代多核心前列腺活检的前列腺特异性抗原与前列腺特异性抗原密度对诊断为 Gleason 6 前列腺癌患者升级的预测作用。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11182.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of biopsy core length on the discrepancy in Gleason scores between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.活检组织条长度对活检标本与根治性前列腺切除术标本之间Gleason评分差异的影响。
BJUI Compass. 2025 Mar 4;6(3):e70009. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70009. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Establishing a model predicting Gleason grade group upgrading in prostate cancer.建立预测前列腺癌Gleason分级组升级的模型。
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1378-1387. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-155. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
3
Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.前列腺穿刺活检至根治性前列腺切除术中Gleason评分升级的危险因素。
Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024;5(4):981-996. doi: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
4
Intravoxel incoherent motion predicts positive surgical margins and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.磁共振扩散峰度成像预测前列腺癌根治术后切缘阳性和 Gleason 评分升级
Radiol Med. 2023 Jun;128(6):668-678. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01645-2. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
The prognostic value of F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in predicting pathological upgrading of newly diagnosed prostate cancer from systematic biopsy to radical prostatectomy.F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT在预测新诊断前列腺癌从系统活检到根治性前列腺切除术的病理升级方面的预后价值。
Front Oncol. 2023 May 10;13:1169189. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1169189. eCollection 2023.
6
A high high-density lipoprotein level is associated with Gleason score upgrade in Chinese patients diagnosed with high-grade prostate carcinoma.高密度脂蛋白水平高与被诊断为高级别前列腺癌的中国患者的 Gleason 评分升级相关。
BMC Urol. 2023 Jan 10;23(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01155-9.
7
Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.在 MRI 靶向活检诊断为 IUSP 1-2 前列腺癌的患者中,根治性前列腺切除术后不良病理的风险和预测因素:一项多中心分析。
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):427-434. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04236-4. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
8
Impact of delay from transperineal biopsy to radical prostatectomy upon objective measures of cancer control.经会阴活检至根治性前列腺切除术的延迟对癌症控制客观指标的影响。
Asian J Urol. 2022 Apr;9(2):170-176. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy in patients with ISUP grade group ≤2 prostate cancer.与 ISUP 分级分组≤2 的前列腺癌患者从活检到前列腺切除术的病理升级相关的临床病理因素。
Asian J Androl. 2022 Sep-Oct;24(5):487-493. doi: 10.4103/aja2021108.
10
Prostate Cancer Biomarker Development: National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group Review.前列腺癌生物标志物的开发:美国国家癌症研究所早期检测研究网络前列腺癌协作组综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Dec;29(12):2454-2462. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1104. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
2
The Impact of Pathologic Upgrading of Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on the Risk of the Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy.前列腺癌 Gleason 评分 7 升级对根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发风险的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 30;2018:4510149. doi: 10.1155/2018/4510149. eCollection 2018.
3
Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.PI-RADS v2 在预测经活检证实的 Gleason 评分 6 级前列腺癌升级中的作用。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Aug;16(4):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.10000 例 Gleason3+4 有利的中危前列腺癌患者升级和升期风险。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jan;5(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
5
Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.男性行即刻根治性前列腺切除术的不良病理发现:定义一个有利的中危风险组。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):89-92. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1879.
6
10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.局限性前列腺癌监测、手术或放疗 10 年后的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
7
Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.Gleason 评分 3+4“有利中危”前列腺癌的不良疾病特征:对主动监测的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):442-447. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.043. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
8
Extreme Gleason Upgrading From Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy: A Population-based Analysis.从活检到根治性前列腺切除术的Gleason分级极端升级:一项基于人群的分析。
Urology. 2016 Oct;96:148-155. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.058. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
9
Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement.主动监测在局限性前列腺癌管理中的应用(安大略癌症护理指南):美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南的认可。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2182-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.7759. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
10
Prostate Cancer: PI-RADS Version 2 Helps Preoperatively Predict Clinically Significant Cancers.前列腺癌:PI-RADS 版本 2 有助于术前预测临床显著癌症。
Radiology. 2016 Jul;280(1):108-16. doi: 10.1148/radiol.16151133. Epub 2016 Feb 2.