Aziz-Gandour I A, Newman H N
J Clin Periodontol. 1986 Mar;13(3):228-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb01465.x.
This study compared a simplified oral hygiene regime (scaling, root planing and Bass brushing) with this same regime plus 0.02% chlorhexidine (CH), 0.05% metronidazole (MD) and inactive control (PL) solutions delivered supragingivally by a pulsating water jet irrigator. 22 patients were distributed randomly into 3 groups, 0.02% chlorhexidine (CH), 0.05% metronidazole (MD), and inactive control (PL). Approximal surfaces with associated pockets greater than or equal to 4 mm were monitored at day 0, for plaque index (PII), gingival index (GI), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), baseline measurement for gingival shrinkage and probable pocket depth. All monitored surfaces were then immediately scaled and root planed. All patients received identical oral hygiene instruction (Bass brushing), with a sodium fluoride toothpaste and a multituft toothbrush, and were shown how to use the oral irrigator. Proficiency in use of the oral irrigator was checked again at day 7. No interdental cleaning was taught. The active treatment period was 28 days. Patients were seen at days 7, 28, 56 and 84, and all parameters were recorded at each visit, but no further oral hygiene instruction was given. Within procedure comparisons of the findings at days 28 (end of active treatment) 56 and 84 with those at day 0, showed statistically highly significant improvements in all parameters for all groups. Regarding between procedure comparisons, CH was better in reducing PII at all times except at day 84, and on several occasions in reducing GI and SBI. Irrigated groups were always better than nonirrigated groups. Although the differences were statistically highly significant, clinically the differences between groups were relatively small, except for CH effect on PII.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究将一种简化的口腔卫生方案(龈上洁治、根面平整和巴氏刷牙法)与该方案加上通过脉动式水喷射冲洗器龈上递送的0.02%氯己定(CH)、0.05%甲硝唑(MD)及无活性对照(PL)溶液进行了比较。22名患者被随机分为3组,即0.02%氯己定(CH)组、0.05%甲硝唑(MD)组和无活性对照(PL)组。在第0天,对伴有大于或等于4mm牙周袋的邻面进行菌斑指数(PII)、牙龈指数(GI)、龈沟出血指数(SBI)监测,以及牙龈退缩和可能的牙周袋深度的基线测量。然后对所有监测表面立即进行龈上洁治和根面平整。所有患者均接受相同的口腔卫生指导(巴氏刷牙法),使用含氟牙膏和多束牙刷,并学习如何使用口腔冲洗器。在第7天再次检查使用口腔冲洗器的熟练程度。未教授牙间隙清洁方法。积极治疗期为28天。在第7天、28天、56天和84天对患者进行检查,并在每次就诊时记录所有参数,但未给予进一步的口腔卫生指导。在第28天(积极治疗结束时)、56天和84天的结果与第0天的结果进行的程序内比较显示,所有组的所有参数均有统计学上高度显著的改善。关于程序间比较,除第84天外,CH在所有时间降低PII方面均更好,并且在降低GI和SBI方面有几次也是如此。冲洗组始终优于未冲洗组。尽管差异在统计学上高度显著,但临床上除CH对PII的影响外,各组之间的差异相对较小。(摘要截短于250字)