• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用 Rasch 模型分析评估中文版重返工作自信心问卷的心理测量学特性。

Assessing the psychometric properties of the Chinese return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire using Rasch model analysis.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, No. 100 Science Avenue, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 16;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01929-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-022-01929-7
PMID:35172850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8848945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-efficacy is a significant predictor of return to work and affects the confidence of survivors to return to work after illness. The Return-to-work self-efficacy (RTW-SE) questionnaire is a self-report questionnaire to assess confidence in returning to work with good reliability and validity. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the RTW-SE questionnaire into Chinese and examine the psychometric properties among young and middle-aged stroke survivors using Rasch model analysis.

METHODS

The cross-cultural adaptation and translation procedures followed a dual-translation approach. The psychometric properties of the RTW-SE questionnaire were examined using Rasch model analysis by Winsteps software. The unidimensionality and local independence were analyzed by principal component analysis of the residuals (PCAR) and standardized residual correlations.Category diagnostics were performed for scale function, and the item fit, reliability, and separation were also validated. Item-person maps were used to examine the distribution and matching of item's location and person ability. Finally, the differential item functioning (DIF) was used to measure gender-related group equivalence.

RESULTS

A total of 366 participants aged 23-59 years were recruited from three communities in Zhengzhou. The RTW-SE questionnaire demonstrated unidimensionality and a 5-point Likert rating scale was more appropriate to investigate young and middle-aged stroke survivors'self-efficacy. There was a good fit for the items with both person and item reliabilities greater than 0.8 and separation indices of 3.75 and 3.94, respectively. The item location was identified from the item-person map as not covering person ability, but the scale did not have an age-related DIF.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm evidence of appropriate psychometric properties of the RTW-SE questionnaire and can be used as a reliable and validated instrument for measuring self-efficacy to return to work in young and middle-aged Chinese patients with stroke.

摘要

背景

自我效能感是预测重返工作岗位的重要指标,它影响着患者在患病后重返工作岗位的信心。重返工作自我效能感(RTW-SE)问卷是一种自我报告问卷,用于评估重返工作的信心,具有良好的信度和效度。本研究旨在将 RTW-SE 问卷翻译成中文,并使用 Rasch 模型分析检验其在中青年脑卒中幸存者中的心理测量特性。

方法

采用双翻译法进行跨文化适应性翻译。使用 Winsteps 软件的 Rasch 模型分析检验 RTW-SE 问卷的心理测量特性。通过残差主成分分析(PCAR)和标准化残差相关分析进行单维性和局部独立性分析。对量表功能进行类别诊断,验证项目拟合、信度和分离度。使用项目-人映射图检查项目位置和人员能力的分布和匹配。最后,使用差异项目功能(DIF)测量性别相关组等效性。

结果

共招募了来自郑州三个社区的 366 名 23-59 岁的参与者。RTW-SE 问卷表现出单一维度,5 点 Likert 评分更适合调查中青年脑卒中幸存者的自我效能感。项目和人员的拟合度良好,可靠性均大于 0.8,分离指数分别为 3.75 和 3.94。从项目-人映射图中可以看出,项目位置并未涵盖人员能力,但量表没有年龄相关的 DIF。

结论

结果证实了 RTW-SE 问卷具有适当的心理测量特性,可以作为测量中青年脑卒中患者重返工作岗位自我效能的可靠和有效的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7628/8848945/e06b98b7da28/12955_2022_1929_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7628/8848945/3cbb2ebb5858/12955_2022_1929_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7628/8848945/e06b98b7da28/12955_2022_1929_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7628/8848945/3cbb2ebb5858/12955_2022_1929_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7628/8848945/e06b98b7da28/12955_2022_1929_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the psychometric properties of the Chinese return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire using Rasch model analysis.运用 Rasch 模型分析评估中文版重返工作自信心问卷的心理测量学特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Feb 16;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01929-7.
2
A psychometric assessment of the St. George's respiratory questionnaire in patients with COPD using Rasch model analysis.使用拉施模型分析对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行圣乔治呼吸问卷的心理测量评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Aug 20;13:131. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0320-7.
3
Measuring palliative care self-efficacy of intellectual and developmental disability staff using Rasch models.使用 Rasch 模型测量智障和发育障碍员工的姑息治疗自我效能感。
Palliat Support Care. 2024 Feb;22(1):146-154. doi: 10.1017/S1478951522001833.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the caregiver self-efficacy in contributing to patient self-care scale in China.中国患者自我护理贡献照顾者自我效能感量表的跨文化调适与验证。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):1977. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19534-2.
5
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
6
Rasch analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in a sample of persons with morbid obesity.对病态肥胖人群样本中一般自我效能感量表的 Rasch 分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Nov 25;11:202. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-202.
7
Rasch analysis of the pre-sleep arousal scale in patients with acute insomnia disorder.急性失眠障碍患者预入睡觉醒量表的 Rasch 分析。
Sleep Med. 2024 Jul;119:329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2024.05.022. Epub 2024 May 9.
8
Psychometric Testing of the Turkish Version of the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.《土耳其版脑卒中自我效能问卷的心理测量学测试》。
J Nurs Res. 2019 Aug;27(4):e35. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000308.
9
Validation of the Dutch version of the Swallowing Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (DSWAL-QoL) and the adjusted DSWAL-QoL (aDSWAL-QoL) using item analysis with the Rasch model: a pilot study.使用拉施模型进行项目分析对荷兰版吞咽生活质量问卷(DSWAL-QoL)及调整后的DSWAL-QoL(aDSWAL-QoL)进行验证:一项试点研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 7;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0639-3.
10
Is the Patient Activation Measure a valid measure of osteoarthritis self-management attitudes and capabilities? Results of a Rasch analysis.患者激活度量表(PAM)是否能有效测量骨关节炎自我管理的态度和能力?一项 Rasch 分析的结果。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 May 5;18(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01364-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of return-to-work after thyroid cancer surgery based on random forest model: a cross-sectional study.基于随机森林模型的甲状腺癌手术后重返工作岗位的预测因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Surg. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02901-0.
2
Return-to-work self-efficacy questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in China.重返工作岗位自我效能问卷:在中国的跨文化调适与验证
Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):6336-6344. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1882. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum clinical important difference for resilience scale specific to cancer: a prospective analysis.癌症专用韧性量表的最小临床重要差异:一项前瞻性分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Dec 9;18(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01631-6.
2
Self-efficacy and return to work in cancer survivors: Current knowledge and future prospects.癌症幸存者的自我效能感与重返工作岗位:当前认知与未来展望。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Nov;29(6):e13304. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13304. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
3
State or trait? Measuring resilience by generalisability theory in breast cancer.
状态还是特质?用概化理论测量乳腺癌患者的心理弹性
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Feb 6;46:101727. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101727.
4
The Predictive Value of Return to Work Self-efficacy for Return to Work Among Employees with Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy.化疗癌症员工的工作效能回归预测对其重返工作岗位的价值。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Dec;30(4):665-678. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09882-2.
5
Global, Regional and Country-Specific Burden of Ischaemic Stroke, Intracerebral Haemorrhage and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.全球、区域和国家特定缺血性卒中、脑出血和蛛网膜下腔出血负担:2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(2):171-179. doi: 10.1159/000506396. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Intention to Return to Work after Stroke Following Rehabilitation in Ontario.安大略省康复后脑卒中患者的工作意愿。
Can J Occup Ther. 2020 Jun;87(3):221-226. doi: 10.1177/0008417420905706. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
7
Differential item functioning and its relevance to epidemiology.项目功能差异及其与流行病学的相关性。
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2019 Jun 15;6:174-183. doi: 10.1007/s40471-019-00194-5. Epub 2019 May 1.
8
Returning to work after sickness absence due to common mental disorders: study design and baseline findings from an 18 months mixed methods follow-up study in Germany.因常见精神障碍而缺勤后重返工作岗位:德国一项为期 18 个月的混合方法随访研究的设计和基线结果。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 10;19(1):1653. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7999-z.
9
Measuring the validity and reliability of the Lithuanian missed nursing care in infection prevention and control scales using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析评估立陶宛感染预防与控制量表中遗漏护理的有效性和可靠性。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Nov;28(8):2025-2035. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12918. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
10
Chronic Diseases and Employment: Which Interventions Support the Maintenance of Work and Return to Work among Workers with Chronic Illnesses? A Systematic Review.慢性疾病与就业:哪些干预措施支持慢性病患者维持工作和重返工作岗位?系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 27;16(10):1864. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16101864.