Suppr超能文献

完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术和李金斯坦疝修补术对精子抗体水平的比较。一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of Antisperm Antibody levels following totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and Lichtenstein hernia repair. A randomized controlled trial.

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2022;92:363-368.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The study was supported by TUEK (Board of Education and Expertise in Medicine - grant number 2016-1201). Funding source had no involvement in conducting or reporting process of this study. Comparison of Antisperm Antibody level following extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and Lichenstein hernia >A randomzed rial PURPOSE: We compared laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) hernia repair and open Lichtenstein hernia repair (LHR) in terms of Antisperm Antibody Levels (ASA), pain, operative times, return to work times, hernia recurrence, and postsurgery complications.

METHODS

The patients were randomly divided into two groups as LHR and TEP. Blood samples were obtained for analysis of levels of ASA. Postoperative pain scores were assessed on the first day after repair using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and hernia recurrence, operation times, return to work times, and early and late postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty male patients enrolled in the study. All patients were negative for ASA presurgery. ASA were detected in two patients in the LHR group postsurgery. The VAS score of the patients in the TEP repair group was significantly lower than that in the LHR group (median: 4.0 vs. 6.0) (p <0.001). The mean operation time in the TEP hernia repair group (50 min) was significantly longer than that in the LHR group (40 min) (40.0) (p <0.011). The median return to work time in the TEP hernia repair group (7 d) was significantly shorter than that in the LHR group (15 d)(p <0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two methods in terms of ASA,recurrence, or postoperative complications (p> 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Many studies have compared the superiority of different inguinal hernia repair methods. Which CONCLUSION: It is not possible to determine the superiority of concerning technics in reducing infertility after surgery. TEP inguinal hernia repair is superior to LHR in in terms of postoperative pain and return to work times.

KEY WORDS

Lichtenstein, Antisperm antibody, İnfertility, Inguinal hernia, Totally extra peritoneal repair.

摘要

目的

我们比较了腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术和开放式李金斯坦疝修补术(LHR)在抗精子抗体水平(ASA)、疼痛、手术时间、恢复工作时间、疝复发和术后并发症方面的差异。

方法

将患者随机分为 LHR 和 TEP 两组。采集血样分析 ASA 水平。术后第一天使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术后疼痛评分,记录疝复发、手术时间、恢复工作时间以及早期和晚期术后并发症。

结果

共有 60 名男性患者入组研究。所有患者术前 ASA 均为阴性。LHR 组术后有 2 例患者检测到 ASA。TEP 修补组患者的 VAS 评分明显低于 LHR 组(中位数:4.0 对 6.0)(p<0.001)。TEP 疝修补组的平均手术时间(50 分钟)明显长于 LHR 组(40 分钟)(p<0.011)。TEP 疝修补组的中位恢复工作时间(7 天)明显短于 LHR 组(15 天)(p<0.001)。两种方法在 ASA、复发或术后并发症方面无统计学差异(p>0.05)。

讨论

许多研究比较了不同腹股沟疝修补方法的优势。

结论

无法确定哪种手术技术在降低术后不育方面更具优势。TEP 腹股沟疝修补术在术后疼痛和恢复工作时间方面优于 LHR。

关键词

李金斯坦、抗精子抗体、不育、腹股沟疝、完全腹膜外修补。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验