Suppr超能文献

Lichtenstein 与腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的比较。

Comparison between Lichtenstein And Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitonial (TEP) Tension Free Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia.

机构信息

Col Dr Md Rezwonul Haque, Classified Specialist in Surgery, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Jashore, Bangladesh; E-mail:

出版信息

Mymensingh Med J. 2022 Oct;31(4):1128-1134.

Abstract

To compare the outcome of the laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal (Lap TEP) and open Lichtenstein tension free mesh repair (OLMR) of inguinal hernia. This study was conducted as a prospective comparative (Quasi experimental) study from January 2010 to December 2010 at Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Dhaka, Bangladesh. A total of 100 male patients aged 24 to 70 years who underwent laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (Lap TEP) and open Lichtenstein tension free mesh repair (OLMR) of inguinal hernia were included in this study. Data of operating time, intraoperative and short-term postoperative complications, postoperative pain, postoperative hospital stay and return to normal activity were recorded and analyzed with SPSS program. Mean age of the patients was 51.39±15.099 years in OLMR group (Group A) and 47.10±9.338 years in Lap TEP group (Group B). Mean operating time was longer in Laparoscopic TEP group (Group B, 57.67±6.915 minutes) then open Lichtenstein mesh repair group (Group A, 50.56±6.292 minutes). Patient in the Lap TEP group (Group B) experienced less post operative pain, less post operative complications, shorter hospital stay and early return to normal activity then OLMR group (Group A). One patient (3.33%) in group B needed conversion to open Lichtenstein method. Two (6.66%) patients developed pneumoperitoneum in Group B (Lap TEP repair). Superficial wound infection developed in five (7.14%) patients in OLMR group (Group A) and two (6.66%) patients in Lap TEP group (Group B). In Laparoscopic TEP group (Group B) and Lichtenstein group (Group A), patients return to normal activity within on an average 07 and 11 days respectively. Laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal (TEP) mesh repair technique was associated with less post operative pain, less post operative complications, shorter hospital stay, faster recovery with early return to normal activity compared with Lichtenstein tension free mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

摘要

比较腹腔镜完全腹膜外(Lap TEP)和开放式无张力网片修补术(OLMR)治疗腹股沟疝的结果。本研究是 2010 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月在孟加拉国达卡的三军总医院(CMH)进行的一项前瞻性对比(准实验)研究。共纳入 100 例年龄在 24 至 70 岁之间的男性患者,他们接受了腹腔镜完全腹膜外(Lap TEP)和开放式无张力网片修补术(OLMR)治疗腹股沟疝。记录并分析了手术时间、术中及短期术后并发症、术后疼痛、术后住院时间和恢复正常活动的情况,并使用 SPSS 程序进行分析。OLMR 组(A 组)患者的平均年龄为 51.39±15.099 岁,Lap TEP 组(B 组)患者的平均年龄为 47.10±9.338 岁。Laparoscopic TEP 组(B 组)的手术时间长于开放式无张力网片修补术组(A 组),分别为 57.67±6.915 分钟和 50.56±6.292 分钟。Lap TEP 组(B 组)患者术后疼痛较轻、术后并发症较少、住院时间较短、恢复正常活动较早。B 组中有 1 名患者(3.33%)需要转为开放式无张力网片修补术。B 组中有 2 名患者(6.66%)发生气腹。OLMR 组(A 组)中有 5 名患者(7.14%)发生浅表伤口感染,Lap TEP 组(B 组)中有 2 名患者(6.66%)发生浅表伤口感染。Lap TEP 组(B 组)和 Lichtenstein 组(A 组)患者平均分别在术后 7 天和 11 天恢复正常活动。与开放式无张力网片修补术相比,腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)网片修补术治疗腹股沟疝具有术后疼痛较轻、术后并发症较少、住院时间较短、恢复较快、早期恢复正常活动等优点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验