Eby Joshua C, Richey Morgan M, Sifri Costi D, Schuch Jonathon Z
Employee Health, UVA Health, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Infectious Diseases and International Health, UVA Health, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;43(11):1672-1678. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.513. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
This study was performed to assess whether an intervention for critically appraising influenza vaccine exemption requests from healthcare personnel (HCP) affected (1) the overall rate of influenza vaccine exemption within a healthcare institution and/or (2) the rates of postintervention vaccine acceptance among those who inconsistently request exemption from annual vaccination and those who consistently request exemption from vaccination.
Retrospective, before-and-after intervention study.
We conducted the study at a single academic medical center.
This study included 29,663 HCP.
Between 2010 and 2019, HCP were permitted to request an exemption from influenza vaccination without critical appraisal of exemption requests. After January 2019, medical center policy required critical appraisal of exemption requests. Of those employed 3 or more years who requested an exemption at least once during the preintervention period (n = 1,177), those with unchanging exemption reasons annually were termed "consistent exempters." Those who changed reasons or accepted vaccination n ≥ 1 times were termed "inconsistent exempters."
The overall exemption rate from influenza vaccine decreased from 3.8% to 1.2% ( < .001; N = 29,663) after the intervention. Of those requesting exemption at least once before the intervention, 329 (28.0%) of 1,177 were consistent exempters and 878 (72.0%) were inconsistent exempters. Of inconsistent exempters employed after the intervention, 442 (88.9%) of 497 accepted vaccine postintervention compared with 118 (59.6%) of 198 consistent exempters ( < .001). Of all exempters who changed from exemption to acceptance after the intervention, 442 (78.9%) of 560 were inconsistent exempters.
Critical appraisal of HCP exemption requests promotes influenza vaccine acceptance, and acceptance by inconsistent exempters drives the effect of the intervention. Analysis of changes in annual exemption requests represents a novel objective method for describing those on the spectrum of vaccine hesitancy.
本研究旨在评估对医护人员(HCP)的流感疫苗豁免申请进行批判性评估是否会影响(1)医疗机构内流感疫苗豁免的总体发生率和/或(2)在年度疫苗接种豁免申请不一致者和一直申请疫苗接种豁免者中干预后疫苗接种率。
回顾性干预前后研究。
我们在一家学术医疗中心进行了这项研究。
本研究纳入了29,663名医护人员。
在2010年至2019年期间,医护人员可以在不进行豁免申请批判性评估的情况下申请豁免流感疫苗接种。2019年1月之后,医疗中心政策要求对豁免申请进行批判性评估。在干预前至少申请过一次豁免的工作3年或更长时间的人员(n = 1,177)中,每年豁免理由不变的人员被称为“持续豁免者”。那些改变理由或接受过≥1次疫苗接种的人员被称为“非持续豁免者”。
干预后,流感疫苗的总体豁免率从3.8%降至1.2%(P <.001;N = 29,663)。在干预前至少申请过一次豁免的人员中,1,177人中有329人(28.0%)是持续豁免者,878人(72.0%)是非持续豁免者。在干预后受雇的非持续豁免者中,497人中有442人(88.9%)在干预后接受了疫苗接种,而198名持续豁免者中有118人(59.6%)接受了疫苗接种(P <.001)。在干预后从豁免转为接受疫苗接种的所有豁免者中,560人中有442人(78.9%)是非持续豁免者。
对医护人员豁免申请进行批判性评估可促进流感疫苗接种,非持续豁免者接受疫苗接种推动了干预效果。对年度豁免申请变化的分析代表了一种描述疫苗犹豫程度的新的客观方法。