IQVIA Real-World Solutions, 201 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Pegasus Research, Neuschwaendistrasse 6, 6390 Engelberg, Switzerland.
Vaccine. 2022 Mar 15;40(12):1904-1912. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.072. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
Our objective was to describe and compare self-reported side effects ofCOVID-19 vaccinesin theUSA.
Aweb-basedregistry enrolled volunteers who received a COVID-19 vaccine between March 19-July 15, 2021. We collected self-reported short-term side effects, medical consultation, hospitalization, and quality of life impact following completed vaccination regimens (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J).
We recruited 6,966 volunteers who completed their full course of vaccination (median age 48 years, IQR 35.0-62.0; 83.6% female): Pfizer 3,486; Moderna 2,857; J&J 623. Few (3.1%) sought medical care for post-vaccination side effects. Hospitalization (n = 17; 0.3%) and severe allergic reactions (n = 39; 0.6%) also were rare. Those with autoimmune disease or lung disease were approximately twice as likely to seek medical care (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.01, 95% CI:1.39; 2.92 and aOR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.12; .58 respectively). 92.4% of participantsreported ≥ 1side effect (median 3), with injection site reactions (78.9%), fatigue (70.3%), headache (49.0%) reported most frequently. More side effects were reported after the second dose of two-dose vaccines (medians: 1 vs. 2 for Pfizer and 1 vs. 3 for Moderna for first and second doses respectively) versus 3 for J&J's single-dose vaccine. For the employed, the median number of workdays missed was one. Diabetics and those vaccinated against influenza were substantially less likely to report 3 or more symptoms (aOR 0.68, 95% CI: 0.56;0.82] and aOR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73;0.93, respectively).
The total side effect burden was, not unexpectedly, greater with two-dose regimens but all three vaccines appear relatively safe. Very few subjects reported side effects serious enough to warrant medical care or reported post-vaccination hospitalization. While these findings do not address possible long-term effects, they do inform on their short-term safety and tolerability and will hopefully provide some reassurance and positively inform the benefit-risk and pharmacoeconomic assessment for all three vaccines. See Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04368065.
我们的目标是描述和比较美国 COVID-19 疫苗的自我报告副作用。
一个基于网络的注册系统招募了 2021 年 3 月 19 日至 7 月 15 日期间接种 COVID-19 疫苗的志愿者。我们收集了接种完疫苗后(辉瑞、莫德纳、强生)的短期自我报告副作用、医疗咨询、住院和生活质量影响。
我们招募了 6966 名完成全程疫苗接种的志愿者(中位年龄 48 岁,IQR 35.0-62.0;83.6%为女性):辉瑞 3486 人,莫德纳 2857 人,强生 623 人。只有(3.1%)少数人因接种后副作用寻求医疗。住院(n=17;0.3%)和严重过敏反应(n=39;0.6%)也很少见。患有自身免疫性疾病或肺部疾病的人寻求医疗的可能性大约是两倍(调整后的优势比(aOR)2.01,95%CI:1.39;2.92 和 aOR 1.70,95%CI:1.12;0.58)。92.4%的参与者报告了(≥1 种副作用(中位数 3),最常报告的是注射部位反应(78.9%)、疲劳(70.3%)和头痛(49.0%)。两剂疫苗的第二剂(辉瑞和莫德纳的中位数分别为 1 比 2,而强生的单剂疫苗为 3)比两剂疫苗的第一剂(中位数分别为 1 比 2)报告了更多的副作用。对于在职人员,平均旷工天数为 1 天。糖尿病患者和接种流感疫苗的患者报告 3 种或更多症状的可能性显著降低(aOR 0.68,95%CI:0.56;0.82]和 aOR 0.82,95%CI:0.73;0.93)。
两剂方案的总体副作用负担,不出所料,更大,但三种疫苗均相对安全。很少有受试者报告副作用严重到需要医疗或报告接种后住院。虽然这些发现并不能解决潜在的长期影响,但它们确实说明了它们的短期安全性和耐受性,希望能提供一些保证,并积极影响对所有三种疫苗的利益风险和药物经济学评估。请查看 Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04368065。