Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
RMD Open. 2022 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002089.
To compare the diagnostic accuracy of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), standard T1-weighted (T1w) images and high-resolution 3D-gradient echo sequences (volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE)) for detection of erosions in patients with peripheral arthritis using CT as standard of reference.
A total of 36 patients were included in the study. All patients underwent CT and MRI, including SWI, VIBE and T1w sequences of the clinically more affected hand. Two trained readers scored all imaging datasets separately for erosions in a blinded fashion. Specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of MRI sequences were calculated on a per-patient level.
CT was positive for erosion in 16 patients and 77 bones (Rheumatoid Arthritis MRI Score >0), T1w in 28 patients, VIBE in 25 patients and SWI in 17 patients. All MRI sequences performed with comparably high sensitivities (T1w 100%, VIBE 94% and SWI 94%). SWI had the highest specificity of 90%, followed by VIBE (50%) and T1w (40%). Both T1w and VIBE produced significantly higher sum scores than CT (341 and 331 vs 148, p<0.0001), while the sum score for SWI did not differ from CT (119 vs 148; p=0.411).
Specificity for erosion detection remains a challenge for MRI when conventional and high-resolution sequences are used but can be improved by direct bone depiction with SWI. Both T1w and VIBE tend to overestimate erosions, when CT is used as the standard of reference.
比较磁敏感加权成像(SWI)、标准 T1 加权(T1w)图像和高分辨率 3D 梯度回波序列(容积内插屏气检查(VIBE))在使用 CT 作为参考标准检测外周关节炎患者侵蚀方面的诊断准确性。
本研究共纳入 36 例患者。所有患者均行 CT 和 MRI 检查,包括 SWI、VIBE 和 T1w 序列,均为临床受累程度较重的手。两名经过培训的读者以盲法分别对所有成像数据集进行侵蚀评分。在患者水平计算 MRI 序列的特异性、敏感性和诊断准确性。
CT 对 16 例患者的 77 块骨骼(类风湿关节炎 MRI 评分>0)、28 例患者的 T1w、25 例患者的 VIBE 和 17 例患者的 SWI 均呈阳性。所有 MRI 序列的敏感性均较高(T1w 为 100%,VIBE 为 94%,SWI 为 94%)。SWI 的特异性最高,为 90%,其次是 VIBE(50%)和 T1w(40%)。T1w 和 VIBE 的总分均显著高于 CT(341 和 331 与 148 相比,p<0.0001),而 SWI 的总分与 CT 无差异(119 与 148 相比,p=0.411)。
当使用常规和高分辨率序列时,MRI 检测侵蚀的特异性仍然是一个挑战,但可以通过 SWI 直接显示骨骼来提高。当以 CT 作为参考标准时,T1w 和 VIBE 往往会高估侵蚀。