• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

汽车中的非典:二氧化碳水平提供了一种评估机动车通风情况的简单方法。 (注:这里原文中的“SARS”可能有误,结合语境推测这里应该是“车内空气质量相关问题”之类的意思,若按正确内容翻译会更准确,但按给定原文就是上述译文)

SARS in Cars: Carbon Dioxide Levels Provide a Simple Means to Assess Ventilation in Motor Vehicles.

作者信息

Haq Muhammed F, Cadnum Jennifer L, Carlisle Matthew, Hecker Michelle T, Donskey Curtis J

机构信息

Research Service, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.

Department of Infectious Diseases, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

Pathog Immun. 2022 Feb 2;7(1):19-30. doi: 10.20411/pai.v7i1.493. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.20411/pai.v7i1.493
PMID:35178491
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8843085/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poorly ventilated enclosed spaces pose a risk for airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and other respiratory viruses. Limited information is available on ventilation in motor vehicles under differing driving conditions.

METHODS

We conducted carbon dioxide measurements to assess ventilation in motor vehicles under varying driving conditions with 2 to 3 vehicle occupants. During routine driving, carbon dioxide produced by the breathing of vehicle occupants was measured inside 5 cars and a van under a variety of driving conditions with or without the ventilation fan on and with windows open or closed. Carbon dioxide readings above 800 parts per million (ppm) were considered an indicator of suboptimal ventilation.

RESULTS

Carbon dioxide levels remained below 800 ppm in all vehicles if the ventilation fan was on and/or the windows were open while parked or during city or highway driving. With the ventilation system set on non-recirculation mode, carbon dioxide levels rose above 800 ppm in all vehicles when the fan was off and the windows were closed while parked and during city driving, and in 2 of the 6 vehicles during highway driving. With the ventilation system set on recirculation mode, carbon dioxide rose above 800 ppm within 10 minutes in all vehicles tested.

CONCLUSION

Carbon dioxide measurements could provide a practical and rapid method to assess ventilation in motor vehicles. Simple measures such as opening windows, turning on the fan, and avoiding the recirculation mode greatly improve ventilation.

摘要

背景

通风不良的封闭空间存在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)及其他呼吸道病毒空气传播的风险。关于不同驾驶条件下机动车通风情况的信息有限。

方法

我们进行了二氧化碳测量,以评估有2至3名车内人员时机动车在不同驾驶条件下的通风情况。在常规驾驶过程中,在5辆汽车和1辆厢式货车内,于各种驾驶条件下,在通风风扇开启或关闭、车窗打开或关闭的情况下,测量车内人员呼吸产生的二氧化碳。二氧化碳读数超过百万分之800(ppm)被视为通风欠佳的指标。

结果

如果停车时或城市或高速公路驾驶期间通风风扇开启和/或车窗打开,所有车辆内的二氧化碳水平均保持在800 ppm以下。通风系统设置为非循环模式时,停车时和城市驾驶期间风扇关闭且车窗关闭时,所有车辆内的二氧化碳水平均升至800 ppm以上,高速公路驾驶时6辆车中有2辆如此。通风系统设置为循环模式时,所有测试车辆内的二氧化碳在10分钟内升至800 ppm以上。

结论

二氧化碳测量可为评估机动车通风情况提供一种实用且快速的方法。开窗、打开风扇及避免循环模式等简单措施可大大改善通风。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/3cbe56ce3801/pai-7-19-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/033688aa65ca/pai-7-19-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/112866889b25/pai-7-19-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/6ad19f528b28/pai-7-19-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/3cbe56ce3801/pai-7-19-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/033688aa65ca/pai-7-19-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/112866889b25/pai-7-19-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/6ad19f528b28/pai-7-19-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bafd/8843085/3cbe56ce3801/pai-7-19-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
SARS in Cars: Carbon Dioxide Levels Provide a Simple Means to Assess Ventilation in Motor Vehicles.汽车中的非典:二氧化碳水平提供了一种评估机动车通风情况的简单方法。 (注:这里原文中的“SARS”可能有误,结合语境推测这里应该是“车内空气质量相关问题”之类的意思,若按正确内容翻译会更准确,但按给定原文就是上述译文)
Pathog Immun. 2022 Feb 2;7(1):19-30. doi: 10.20411/pai.v7i1.493. eCollection 2022.
2
Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Ventilation in Households to Reduce Risk for Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.评估改善家庭通风以降低严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2传播风险的干预措施。
Pathog Immun. 2022 Dec 10;7(2):120-130. doi: 10.20411/pai.v7i2.553. eCollection 2022.
3
Planes, Trains, and Automobiles: Use of Carbon Dioxide Monitoring to Assess Ventilation During Travel.飞机、火车和汽车:利用二氧化碳监测评估旅行期间的通气情况。
Pathog Immun. 2022 Feb 25;7(1):31-40. doi: 10.20411/pai.v7i1.495. eCollection 2022.
4
Use of carbon dioxide measurements to assess ventilation in an acute care hospital.利用二氧化碳测量评估急症医院的通风情况。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Feb;50(2):229-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
5
Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Demonstrates Variations in the Quality of Ventilation on Public Transportation Buses and University Student Shuttle Vans and Identifies Effective Interventions.二氧化碳监测显示了公共交通巴士和大学生穿梭巴士通风质量的差异,并确定了有效的干预措施。
Pathog Immun. 2023 Nov 21;8(1):148-160. doi: 10.20411/pai.v8i1.619. eCollection 2023.
6
Measurement of air exchange rate of stationary vehicles and estimation of in-vehicle exposure.静止车辆空气交换率的测量及车内暴露量的估算。
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1998 Jan-Mar;8(1):65-78.
7
Air change rates of motor vehicles and in-vehicle pollutant concentrations from secondhand smoke.机动车的换气率及二手烟中的车内污染物浓度。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 May;18(3):312-25. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500601. Epub 2007 Jul 18.
8
Carbon dioxide accumulation inside vehicles: The effect of ventilation and driving conditions.车内二氧化碳积聚:通风和驾驶条件的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jan 1;610-611:1448-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.105. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
How can ventilation be improved on public transportation buses? Insights from CO measurements.如何改善公共交通巴士的通风?CO 测量的见解。
Environ Res. 2022 Apr 1;205:112451. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112451. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
10
Investigation of a cluster of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in a hospital administration building.医院行政大楼内发生的一组严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)感染的调查。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;44(2):277-283. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.45. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Among Residents and Employees in a Veterans Affairs Community Living Center: A 42-Month Prospective Cohort Study.退伍军人事务部社区生活中心居民和员工中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的传播:一项为期42个月的前瞻性队列研究。
Pathog Immun. 2024 Apr 24;9(1):91-107. doi: 10.20411/pai.v9i1.691. eCollection 2024.
2
Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Demonstrates Variations in the Quality of Ventilation on Public Transportation Buses and University Student Shuttle Vans and Identifies Effective Interventions.二氧化碳监测显示了公共交通巴士和大学生穿梭巴士通风质量的差异,并确定了有效的干预措施。
Pathog Immun. 2023 Nov 21;8(1):148-160. doi: 10.20411/pai.v8i1.619. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Use of carbon dioxide measurements to assess ventilation in an acute care hospital.利用二氧化碳测量评估急症医院的通风情况。
Am J Infect Control. 2022 Feb;50(2):229-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.017. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
2
Do plexiglass barriers reduce the risk for transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)?有机玻璃挡板是否能降低严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)传播的风险?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;44(6):1010-1013. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.383. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
3
Ventilation Assessment by Carbon Dioxide Levels in Dental Treatment Rooms.
Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Ventilation in Households to Reduce Risk for Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.
评估改善家庭通风以降低严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2传播风险的干预措施。
Pathog Immun. 2022 Dec 10;7(2):120-130. doi: 10.20411/pai.v7i2.553. eCollection 2022.
4
Is ventilation in grocery stores adequate to minimize the risk for airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2?杂货店中的通风是否足以将严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2空气传播的风险降至最低?
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 10;2(1):e182. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.322. eCollection 2022.
5
If you can't measure it, you can't improve it: Practical tools to assess ventilation and airflow patterns to reduce the risk for transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and other airborne pathogens.如果你无法测量,就无法改进:评估通风和气流模式以降低严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2及其他空气传播病原体传播风险的实用工具。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Jul;43(7):915-917. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.103. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
诊室二氧化碳水平评估。
J Dent Res. 2021 Jul;100(8):810-816. doi: 10.1177/00220345211014441. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Isolation of SARS-CoV-2 from the air in a car driven by a COVID patient with mild illness.从一位轻症 COVID 患者驾驶的汽车内空气中分离出 SARS-CoV-2。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul;108:212-216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.04.063. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
5
Simulation of aerosol transmission on a Boeing 737 airplane with intervention measures for COVID-19 mitigation.波音737飞机上气溶胶传播的模拟以及减轻COVID-19的干预措施
Phys Fluids (1994). 2021 Mar 1;33(3):033312. doi: 10.1063/5.0044720. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in a Patient Transport Van.患者运输车中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的传播。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 29;74(2):339-342. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab347.
7
Experimental Investigation of Aerosol and CO Dispersion for Evaluation of COVID-19 Infection Risk in a Concert Hall.音乐厅气溶胶和 CO 扩散的实验研究评估 COVID-19 感染风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;18(6):3037. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063037.
8
Assessment of CO and aerosol (PM, PM, UFP) concentrations during the reopening of schools in the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of a metropolitan area in Central-Southern Spain.评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间学校重新开放期间的 CO 和气溶胶(PM、PM、UFP)浓度:以西班牙中南部一个大都市区为例。
Environ Res. 2021 Jun;197:111092. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111092. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
9
Airflows inside passenger cars and implications for airborne disease transmission.车内气流与空气传播疾病传播的关系
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0166. Print 2021 Jan.
10
Community Outbreak Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Among Bus Riders in Eastern China.中国东部公交车乘客中 SARS-CoV-2 传播的社区暴发调查。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1665-1671. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5225.