Milgrom Zheng Z, Severance Tyler S, Scanlon Caitlin M, Carson Anyé T, Janota Andrea D, Burns John L, Vik Terry A, Duwve Joan M, Dixon Brian E, Mendonca Eneida A
Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
JAMIA Open. 2022 Feb 12;5(1):ooac004. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac004. eCollection 2022 Apr.
To enhance cancer prevention and survivorship care by local health care providers, a school of public health introduced an innovative telelearning continuing education program using the Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model. In ECHO's hub and spoke structure, synchronous videoconferencing connects frontline health professionals at various locations ("spokes") with experts at the facilitation center ("hub"). Sessions include experts' didactic presentations and case discussions led by spoke site participants. The objective of this study was to gain a better understanding of the reasons individuals choose or decline to participate in the Cancer ECHO program and to identify incentives and barriers to doing so.
Study participants were recruited from the hub team, spoke site participants, and providers who attended another ECHO program but not this one. Participants chose to take a survey or be interviewed. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided qualitative data coding and analysis.
We conducted 22 semistructured interviews and collected 30 surveys. Incentives identified included the program's high-quality design, supportive learning climate, and access to information. Barriers included a lack of external incentives to participate and limited time available. Participants wanted more adaptability in program timing to fit providers' busy schedules.
Although the merits of the Cancer ECHO program were widely acknowledged, adaptations to facilitate participation and emphasize the program's benefits may help overcome barriers to attending. As the number of telelearning programs grows, the results of this study point to ways to expand participation and spread health benefits more widely.
为提高当地医疗服务提供者的癌症预防和生存护理水平,一所公共卫生学院推出了一项创新的远程学习继续教育项目,采用社区医疗成果扩展(ECHO)模式。在ECHO的中心辐射结构中,同步视频会议将不同地点的一线卫生专业人员(“辐条”)与促进中心的专家(“中心”)联系起来。课程包括专家的教学演示和由辐条站点参与者主导的病例讨论。本研究的目的是更好地了解个人选择参与或拒绝参与癌症ECHO项目的原因,并确定这样做的激励因素和障碍。
研究参与者从中心团队、辐条站点参与者以及参加过另一个ECHO项目但未参加此项目的提供者中招募。参与者选择进行调查或接受访谈。实施研究综合框架指导定性数据编码和分析。
我们进行了22次半结构化访谈并收集了30份调查问卷。确定的激励因素包括项目的高质量设计、支持性的学习氛围以及信息获取。障碍包括缺乏参与的外部激励和可用时间有限。参与者希望项目时间安排更具灵活性,以适应提供者繁忙的日程。
尽管癌症ECHO项目的优点得到广泛认可,但为便于参与和强调项目益处而进行的调整可能有助于克服参与障碍。随着远程学习项目数量的增加,本研究结果指出了扩大参与范围和更广泛传播健康益处的方法。