Suppr超能文献

自力更生还是社会责任?尼日利亚社区卫生委员会存在的原因。

Self-reliance or social accountability? The raison d'être of community health committees in Nigeria.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

National Primary Health Care Development Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 May;37(3):1722-1735. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3438. Epub 2022 Feb 17.

Abstract

Social justice requires that communities demand social accountability. We conducted this study to inform ongoing efforts to facilitate social accountability through community health committees in Nigeria. We theorised that committees may see themselves in two ways - as outwardly-facing ('social accountability') and/or as inwardly-facing ('self-reliance'). We analysed the minutes of their meetings, alongside interviews and group discussions with committee members, community members, health workers, and health managers in four states across Nigeria. The committees' raison d'être reflects a bias for self-reliance in three ways. First, seen as a platform for the community to co-finance health services, members tend to be the local elite who can make financial contributions. Second, in a one-sided relationship, they function more to achieve the goals of governments (e.g. to improve the uptake of services), than of the community (e.g. rights-based demands for government support). Third, their activities in the community reflect greater concern to ensure that their community makes the most of what the government has already provided (e.g. helping to drive the uptake of existing services) than asking for more. Optimising the committees for social accountability may require support by actors who do not have conflicts of interests in ensuring that they have the necessary information and strategies to demand social accountability.

摘要

社会正义要求社区要求社会问责。我们进行这项研究是为了为尼日利亚社区卫生委员会正在进行的促进社会问责的努力提供信息。我们的理论是,委员会可能会以两种方式看待自己 - 向外看(“社会问责”)和/或向内看(“自力更生”)。我们分析了他们会议的记录,以及与委员会成员、社区成员、卫生工作者和卫生经理在尼日利亚四个州的访谈和小组讨论。委员会存在的理由反映了在三个方面对自力更生的偏见。首先,作为社区共同资助卫生服务的平台,成员往往是能够做出财政贡献的当地精英。其次,在这种片面的关系中,他们的作用更多地是为了实现政府的目标(例如提高服务的利用率),而不是社区的目标(例如基于权利的要求政府支持)。第三,他们在社区中的活动反映出更关心确保他们的社区充分利用政府已经提供的资源(例如帮助推动现有服务的普及),而不是要求更多。要使委员会能够实现社会问责制,可能需要没有利益冲突的行为者提供支持,以确保他们有必要的信息和策略来要求社会问责制。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验