Suppr超能文献

当代心房颤动临床试验中按性别进行入组和结局报告的性别差异。

Sex disparities in enrollment and reporting of outcomes by sex in contemporary clinical trials of atrial fibrillation.

机构信息

Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaounde, Cameroon.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 May;33(5):845-854. doi: 10.1111/jce.15421. Epub 2022 Mar 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Underrepresentation of females in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) limits generalizability and quality of the evidence guiding treatment of females. This study aimed to measure the sex disparities in participants' recruitment in RCTs of atrial fibrillation (AF) and determine associated factors, and to describe the frequency of outcomes reported by sex.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched to identify RCTs of AF published between January 1, 2011, and November 20, 2021, in 12 top-tier journals. We measured the enrollment of females using the enrollment disparity difference (EDD) which is the difference between the proportion of females in the trial and the proportion of females with AF in the underlying general population (obtained from the Global Burden of Disease). Random-effects meta-analyses of the EDD were performed, and multivariable meta-regression was used to explore factors associated with disparity estimates. We also determined the proportion of trials that included sex-stratified results.

RESULTS

Out of 1133 records screened, 142 trials were included, reporting on a total of 133 532 participants. The random-effects summary EDD was -0.125 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.143 to -0.108), indicating that females were under-enrolled by 12.5 percentage points. Female enrollment was higher in trials with higher sample size (<250 vs. >750, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.065, 95% CI: 1.008-1.125), higher mean participants' age (aOR: 1.006, 95% CI: 1.002-1.009), and lower in trials conducted in North America compared to Europe (aOR: 0.945, 95% CI: 0.898-0.995). Only 36 trials (25.4%) reported outcomes by sex, and of these 29 (80.6%) performed statistical testing of the sex-by-treatment interaction.

CONCLUSION

Females remain substantially less represented in RCTs of AF, and sex-stratified reporting of primary outcomes is infrequent. These findings call for urgent action to improve sex equity in enrollment and sex-stratified outcomes' reporting in RCTs of AF.

摘要

背景

在随机对照试验(RCT)中女性代表性不足,限制了指导女性治疗的证据的普遍性和质量。本研究旨在衡量房颤(AF)RCT 中参与者招募的性别差异,并确定相关因素,并描述按性别报告的结局的频率。

方法

在 12 种顶级期刊上,从 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 11 月 20 日,我们通过 MEDLINE 搜索发表的 AF RCT 研究。我们使用登记差异差异(EDD)来衡量女性的登记情况,EDD 是试验中女性的比例与基础普通人群中 AF 女性的比例之间的差异(从全球疾病负担中获得)。对 EDD 进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并使用多变量荟萃回归来探索与差异估计相关的因素。我们还确定了纳入按性别分层结果的试验比例。

结果

在筛选出的 1133 条记录中,有 142 项试验被纳入,共报告了 133532 名参与者。随机效应汇总 EDD 为-0.125(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.143 至-0.108),表明女性的登记人数减少了 12.5 个百分点。在样本量较大的试验中(<250 与>750,调整优势比[aOR] 1.065,95%CI:1.008-1.125)、平均参与者年龄较高的试验中(aOR:1.006,95%CI:1.002-1.009)和北美进行的试验中(aOR:0.945,95%CI:0.898-0.995),女性的登记人数较高。只有 36 项试验(25.4%)按性别报告了结局,其中 29 项(80.6%)对性别-治疗相互作用进行了统计检验。

结论

在 AF 的 RCT 中,女性的代表性仍然严重不足,主要结局的按性别分层报告也很少。这些发现呼吁采取紧急行动,以改善 AF 的 RCT 中纳入和按性别分层结局报告的性别平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29b7/9314686/e18ed1c1f666/JCE-33-845-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验