• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010 年至 2017 年女性参与心血管临床试验情况。

Women's Participation in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials From 2010 to 2017.

机构信息

Global Heath Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, China (X.J., E.G., L.L.Y.).

National Heart Centre Singapore (C.C., C.S.P.L.).

出版信息

Circulation. 2020 Feb 18;141(7):540-548. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043594. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043594
PMID:32065763
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among women worldwide, yet, women have historically been underrepresented in cardiovascular trials.

METHODS

We systematically assessed the participation of women in completed cardiovascular trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov between 2010 and 2017, and extracted publicly available information including disease type, sponsor type, country, trial size, intervention type, and the demographic characteristics of trial participants. We calculated the female-to-male ratio for each trial and determined the prevalence-adjusted estimates for participation of women by dividing the percentage of women among trial participants by the percentage of women in the disease population (participation prevalence ratio; a ratio of 0.8 to 1.2 suggests comparable prevalence and good representation).

RESULTS

We identified 740 completed cardiovascular trials including a total of 862 652 adults, of whom 38.2% were women. The median female-to-male ratio of each trial was 0.51 (25th quartile, 0.32; 75th quartile, 0.90) overall and varied by age group (1.02 in ≤55 year old group versus 0.40 in the 61- to 65-year-old group), type of intervention (0.44 for procedural trials versus 0.78 for lifestyle intervention trials), disease type (0.34 for acute coronary syndrome versus 3.20 for pulmonary hypertension), region (0.45 for Western Pacific versus 0.55 for the Americas), funding/sponsor type (0.14 for government-funded versus 0.73 for multiple sponsors), and trial size (0.56 for smaller [n≤47] versus 0.49 for larger [n≥399] trials). Relative to their prevalence in the disease population, participation prevalence ratio was higher than 0.8 for hypertension, pulmonary arterial hypertension and lower (participation prevalence ratio 0.48 to 0.78) for arrhythmia, coronary heart disease, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure trials. The most recent time period (2013 to 2017) saw significant increases in participation prevalence ratios for stroke (=0.007) and heart failure (=0.01) trials compared with previous periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Among cardiovascular trials in the current decade, men still predominate overall, but the representation of women varies with disease and trial characteristics, and has improved in stroke and heart failure trials.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病是全球女性死亡的主要原因,但女性在心血管试验中的代表性历来不足。

方法

我们系统地评估了 2010 年至 2017 年期间在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册的已完成的心血管试验中女性的参与情况,并提取了公开可用的信息,包括疾病类型、赞助商类型、国家/地区、试验规模、干预类型以及试验参与者的人口统计学特征。我们为每个试验计算了女性与男性的比例,并通过将试验参与者中的女性百分比除以疾病人群中的女性百分比来确定女性参与的患病率调整估计值(参与患病率比;0.8 至 1.2 的比值表明患病率相当且代表性良好)。

结果

我们确定了 740 项已完成的心血管试验,其中包括 862652 名成年人,其中 38.2%为女性。每个试验的中位数女性与男性比例为 0.51(第 25 个四分位数,0.32;第 75 个四分位数,0.90),并且因年龄组而异(≤55 岁组为 1.02,61 至 65 岁组为 0.40)、干预类型(程序试验为 0.44,生活方式干预试验为 0.78)、疾病类型(急性冠状动脉综合征为 0.34,肺动脉高压为 3.20)、地区(西太平洋为 0.45,美洲为 0.55)、资金/赞助商类型(政府资助为 0.14,多个赞助商为 0.73)和试验规模(n≤47 的较小试验为 0.56,n≥399 的较大试验为 0.49)。与疾病人群中的患病率相比,高血压、肺动脉高压的参与患病率比高于 0.8,心律失常、冠心病、急性冠状动脉综合征和心力衰竭试验的参与患病率比低于 0.8(0.48 至 0.78)。与前几个时期相比,最近的时间(2013 年至 2017 年),中风(=0.007)和心力衰竭(=0.01)试验的参与患病率比显著增加。

结论

在目前十年的心血管试验中,男性总体上仍然占主导地位,但女性的代表性因疾病和试验特征而异,中风和心力衰竭试验的代表性有所提高。

相似文献

1
Women's Participation in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials From 2010 to 2017.2010 年至 2017 年女性参与心血管临床试验情况。
Circulation. 2020 Feb 18;141(7):540-548. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043594. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
The impact of cardiovascular disease prevalence on women's enrollment in landmark randomized cardiovascular trials: a systematic review.心血管疾病患病率对女性参与 landmark 随机心血管临床试验的影响:一项系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jan;27(1):93-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1768-8. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
3
Representation of women in randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease prevention.心血管疾病预防随机临床试验中的女性代表性。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):135-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.868307. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
4
Participation of Women in Clinical Trials Supporting FDA Approval of Cardiovascular Drugs.女性参与支持 FDA 批准心血管药物的临床试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 8;71(18):1960-1969. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.070.
5
Enrollment of women in cardiovascular clinical trials funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.由美国国立心肺血液研究所资助的心血管临床试验中女性受试者的招募情况。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Aug 17;343(7):475-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008173430706.
6
Persistent under-representation of female patients in United States trials of common vascular diseases from 2008 to 2020.2008年至2020年美国常见血管疾病试验中女性患者持续代表性不足。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.06.480. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
7
The participation of Arab women in randomised clinical trials for cardiovascular diseases.阿拉伯妇女参与心血管疾病随机临床试验的情况。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14612. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14612. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
8
Evolution of Age and Female Representation in the Most-Cited Randomized Controlled Trials of Cardiology of the Last 20 Years.过去20年最具引用率的心脏病学随机对照试验中年龄及女性代表性的演变
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004713. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004713.
9
Enrollment of female participants in United States drug and device phase 1-3 clinical trials between 2016 and 2019.2016 年至 2019 年期间,美国药物和器械 1-3 期临床试验中女性参与者的入组情况。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;115:106718. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106718. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
10
Underrepresentation of Women in Late-Breaking Cardiovascular Clinical Trials.女性在心血管临床试验中的代表性不足。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2023 Jun;32(6):635-640. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0536. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the reporting on health equity in observational research (STROBE-Equity): extension checklist and elaboration.改进观察性研究中健康公平性的报告(STROBE-公平性):扩展清单及阐述
BMJ. 2025 Sep 3;390:e083882. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-083882.
2
Participation of Women in Cardiovascular Trials From 2017 to 2023: A Systematic Review.2017年至2023年女性参与心血管试验情况:一项系统评价
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529104. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29104.
3
Artificial intelligence for cardiac imaging is ready for widespread clinical use: Pro Con debate AI for cardiac imaging.
用于心脏成像的人工智能已准备好广泛应用于临床:支持与反对用于心脏成像的人工智能的辩论
BJR Open. 2025 Jun 6;7(1):tzaf015. doi: 10.1093/bjro/tzaf015. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Outcomes of Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.血管内成像引导的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗心血管结局的性别差异:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
JACC Adv. 2025 Aug 18;4(9):102076. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102076.
5
The economics of investing in women and health.投资于女性与健康的经济学
Nat Med. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03864-8.
6
Beyond Standard Shocks: A Critical Review of Alternative Defibrillation Strategies in Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation.超越标准电击:对难治性室颤替代除颤策略的批判性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 15;14(14):5016. doi: 10.3390/jcm14145016.
7
Transcatheter Structural Heart Interventions in Women.女性经导管结构性心脏病介入治疗
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jul 23;27(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02254-3.
8
Long-term clinical impact of sex disparities in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of adjusted observational studies.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者性别差异的长期临床影响:对调整后的观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e096334. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096334.
9
'Information is power': A qualitative exploration of co-producing education resources about cardiovascular disease in partnership with women living with lupus.“信息就是力量”:与狼疮患者女性合作共同制作心血管疾病教育资源的质性探索
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251351736. doi: 10.1177/17455057251351736. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
10
Sex and gender considerations in randomized controlled trials in critical care nephrology: a meta-epidemiologic study.危重症肾脏病学随机对照试验中的性别与性别的考量:一项元流行病学研究
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04202-y.