Babor T F, Lauerman R J
Recent Dev Alcohol. 1986;4:113-44. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1695-2_5.
This chapter reviews 39 typological classifications of alcoholics published in the world alcohol literature between 1850 and 1941. After a brief discussion of the concept of typology within the Western intellectual tradition, the typologies are described in terms of classification criteria, cultural context, and historical trends. Four countries (France, Germany, England, and the United States) accounted for all but one of the typologies. Within countries, typological theories tended to be concentrated during specific historical periods, often reflecting prevailing trends in medicine, psychiatry, and clinical practice. Despite a number of common themes, there was little indication of the progressive development of typology theory in a predictable direction. Like their counterparts in contemporary times, these typologies failed to gain widespread acceptance as the basis for theoretical explanations or clinical practice. Rather, their function was more likely to serve as justifications for the disciplinary or policy orientations held by the typologists. It is concluded that unless typologies are formulated on the basis of careful research, sound theory, and clinical relevance, they are likely to be relegated to a similar status as historical artifacts.
本章回顾了1850年至1941年间世界酒精文献中发表的39种酗酒者类型分类。在对西方知识传统中的类型学概念进行简要讨论之后,这些类型分类将根据分类标准、文化背景和历史趋势进行描述。除了一种类型分类外,其他所有类型分类都来自四个国家(法国、德国、英国和美国)。在各个国家内部,类型学理论往往集中在特定的历史时期,常常反映出医学、精神病学和临床实践中的主流趋势。尽管存在一些共同主题,但几乎没有迹象表明类型学理论朝着可预测的方向逐步发展。与当代的同类理论一样,这些类型分类未能作为理论解释或临床实践的基础而获得广泛认可。相反,它们的作用更有可能是为类型学家所持的学科或政策取向提供正当理由。得出的结论是,除非类型分类是基于仔细的研究、合理的理论和临床相关性来制定的,否则它们很可能会沦为与历史文物类似的地位。