Suppr超能文献

一种国际回顾性研究:生物制剂在治疗嗜酸性粒细胞增多综合征中的超适应证使用。

An International, Retrospective Study of Off-Label Biologic Use in the Treatment of Hypereosinophilic Syndromes.

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 May;10(5):1217-1228.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.02.006. Epub 2022 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Treatment of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) often requires the use of immunomodulators with substantial side effect profiles. The emergence of biologics offers an alternative treatment modality.

OBJECTIVE

To examine real-world practice data to describe the safety and consequences of various biologics suspected to directly or indirectly affect eosinophilic inflammation for the treatment of HES.

METHODS

Retrospective data from 13 centers were collected via an online Research Electronic Data Capture repository. Inclusion criteria included (1) peripheral eosinophil count of 1,500/mm or greater without a secondary cause; (2) clinical manifestations attributable to the eosinophilia; and (3) having received mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), benralizumab (afucosylated anti-IL-5 receptor α), omalizumab (anti-IgE), alemtuzumab (anti-CD52), dupilumab (anti-IL-4 receptor α), or reslizumab (anti-IL-5) outside a placebo-controlled clinical trial.

RESULTS

Of the 151 courses of biologics prescribed for 121 patients with HES, 59% resulted in improved HES symptoms and 77% enabled tapering of other HES medications. Overall, 105 patients were receiving daily systemic glucocorticoids at the time of a biologic initiation and were able to reduce the glucocorticoid dose by a median reduction of 10 mg of daily prednisone equivalents. Biologics were generally safe and well-tolerated other than infusion reactions with alemtuzumab. Thirteen of 24 patients had clinical improvement after switching biologics and nine patients responded to increasing the dose of mepolizumab after a lack of response to a lower dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologics may offer a safer treatment alternative to existing therapies for HES, although the optimal dosing and choice for each subtype of HES remain to be determined. Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature and intersite differences in data collection and availability of each biologic.

摘要

背景

治疗嗜酸性粒细胞增多综合征(HES)通常需要使用具有大量副作用的免疫调节剂。生物制剂的出现提供了一种替代治疗方法。

目的

检查真实世界实践数据,以描述各种生物制剂的安全性和后果,这些生物制剂被怀疑直接或间接影响嗜酸性粒细胞炎症,用于治疗 HES。

方法

通过在线研究电子数据捕获存储库收集了来自 13 个中心的回顾性数据。纳入标准包括(1)外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数为 1500/mm³或更高,无继发性原因;(2)临床表现归因于嗜酸性粒细胞增多;(3)接受美泊利珠单抗(抗 IL-5)、贝那利珠单抗(去岩藻糖基化抗 IL-5 受体α)、奥马珠单抗(抗 IgE)、阿仑单抗(抗 CD52)、度普利尤单抗(抗 IL-4 受体α)或瑞利珠单抗(抗 IL-5)治疗,且不在安慰剂对照临床试验之外。

结果

在为 121 例 HES 患者开出的 151 个疗程的生物制剂中,59%的患者 HES 症状得到改善,77%的患者能够减少其他 HES 药物的剂量。总体而言,在开始使用生物制剂时,有 105 例患者正在接受每日全身糖皮质激素治疗,并且能够将糖皮质激素剂量中位数减少 10mg 每日泼尼松当量。除阿仑单抗的输注反应外,生物制剂通常是安全且耐受良好的。在 24 例患者中有 13 例在更换生物制剂后临床症状得到改善,9 例在对较低剂量无反应后增加美泊利珠单抗剂量后有反应。

结论

生物制剂可能为 HES 的现有治疗方法提供更安全的治疗选择,尽管每种 HES 亚型的最佳剂量和选择仍有待确定。本研究的局限性包括其回顾性性质以及数据收集和每种生物制剂可用性的站点间差异。

相似文献

3
Biologics and Hypereosinophilic Syndromes: Knowledge Gaps and Controversies.生物制剂与嗜酸性粒细胞增多综合征:知识空白与争议
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Sep;11(9):2666-2671. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.07.026. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
8
Biologics for the Treatment of Allergic Conditions: Eosinophil Disorders.用于治疗过敏病症的生物制剂:嗜酸性粒细胞疾病。
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2020 Nov;40(4):649-665. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Eosinophilic respiratory disorders and the impact of biologics.嗜酸性粒细胞性呼吸系统疾病及生物制剂的影响
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2023 May 1;29(3):202-208. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000951. Epub 2023 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Contributions of Eosinophils to Human Health and Disease.嗜酸性粒细胞对人类健康和疾病的贡献。
Annu Rev Pathol. 2020 Jan 24;15:179-209. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032756.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验