Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Regina Montis Regalis Hospital, ASL CN1, strada S. Rocchetto 99, 12084, Mondovì, Cuneo, Italy.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Regional Center for Joint Arthroplasty, ASO Alessandria, Via Venezia 16, 16121, Alessandria, Italy.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 May;33(4):899-907. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03224-z. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
Candida periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are a rare cause of prosthesis revision with severe consequences and challenging treatment. This study aims to produce a systematic analysis of types of treatment and outcome of knee Candida PJIs and their correlation with specific pathogen species.
During April 2021, a literature search was performed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guideline. Reviewers used the Oxford Level of Evidence (LoE) and Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) score. Modal value of surgical, pharmacological treatment and outcome along with the correlation between types of treatment and outcome was calculated through Chi-square or Fisher exact test.
In total, 115 cases were collected through 51 articles, identifying 116 pathogens. Candida albicans was the most frequent pathogen. Analysis of LoE reveals 40 LoE 5 and 11 LoE 4. Thirteen patients underwent one-stage revision, 46 patients two-stage revision, 6 patients resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis, 4 patients long-term antifungal therapy, and 3 patients debridement with prosthesis retention. Global rate of success was 85.14%. Modal distribution revealed a preference for two-stage revision and Fluconazole in medical therapy. No difference in terms of fungal eradication was found among Candida species (p = 0.503) and for treatments except for two-stage revision and resection arthroplasty (p = 0.0125) or debridement with implant retention (p = 0.0498), and the rest of procedures and resection arthroplasty (0.0192). MINORS score was poor.
Analysis of the literature did not highlight any difference between types of surgical treatment and pathogens in terms of relapse or infection eradication. However, two-stage replacement may be preferred, allowing healing of infection in most cases.
假丝酵母菌假体周围关节感染(PJI)是导致假体翻修的罕见原因,后果严重,治疗极具挑战性。本研究旨在对膝关节假丝酵母菌 PJI 的治疗类型和结果进行系统分析,并探讨其与特定病原体种类的相关性。
2021 年 4 月,根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行文献检索。审查员使用牛津循证医学中心证据分级(LOE)和非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)评分。通过卡方检验或 Fisher 确切检验计算手术、药物治疗和结果的模式值,以及治疗类型和结果之间的相关性。
共通过 51 篇文章收集了 115 例病例,共确定了 116 种病原体。白假丝酵母菌是最常见的病原体。LOE 分析显示 40 项 LOE5 和 11 项 LOE4。13 例患者行一期翻修,46 例患者行二期翻修,6 例患者行关节切除和关节融合术,4 例患者行长期抗真菌治疗,3 例患者行清创保留假体。总体成功率为 85.14%。模态分布显示,二期翻修和氟康唑在药物治疗中更受欢迎。不同假丝酵母菌种类之间(p=0.503)以及除了二期翻修和关节切除(p=0.0125)或清创保留假体(p=0.0498)外,其他治疗方法和关节切除(p=0.0192)之间,在真菌清除方面无差异。MINORS 评分较差。
文献分析并未发现手术治疗类型与病原体之间在复发或感染清除方面存在差异。然而,二期置换可能更受欢迎,因为它可以使大多数病例的感染得到治愈。