• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复剖宫产中使用组织粘合剂或缝线进行皮肤缝合的美容效果:一项随机对照试验。

Cosmetic outcomes of skin closure with tissue adhesive or staples in repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.009
PMID:35183000
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare scar quality associated with metal staples or tissue adhesive for closure of the skin incision at repeat cesarean delivery (CD).

STUDY DESIGN

Single-center Randomized Controlled Trial (ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT04302597), including women undergoing repeat CD using metal staples or 2- octylcyanoacrylate for closure of the skin incision. Patients were randomized to have skin closure following CD with either staples or tissue adhesive. Scar quality was evaluated 2 and 6 months postoperatively using the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), and a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Of the 66 patients who were recruited, 55 successfully completed the study. The duration of surgery was comparable in both groups. A partial wound dehiscence occurred in one patient who had tissue adhesive closure. No difference in subjective and objective scar cosmesis rating was found between tissue adhesive and staples groups at either 2 months or 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In women undergoing CD, stapled wounds and those closed with tissue adhesive result in equivalent cosmetic appearance of the scar.

摘要

目的

比较在重复剖宫产时使用金属钉或组织胶闭合皮肤切口的瘢痕质量。

研究设计

单中心随机对照试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT04302597),纳入接受重复剖宫产并使用金属钉或 2-辛基氰基丙烯酸酯闭合皮肤切口的女性。患者随机分为采用金属钉或组织胶闭合皮肤切口。术后 2 个月和 6 个月使用温哥华瘢痕量表、患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)和视觉模拟评分评估瘢痕质量。

结果

共招募了 66 名患者,其中 55 名成功完成了研究。两组手术时间相当。1 名使用组织胶闭合的患者出现部分伤口裂开。在术后 2 个月和 6 个月时,组织胶组和金属钉组的主观和客观瘢痕美容评分均无差异。

结论

在接受剖宫产的女性中,金属钉缝合的伤口和组织胶闭合的伤口的瘢痕外观相当。

相似文献

1
Cosmetic outcomes of skin closure with tissue adhesive or staples in repeated cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial.重复剖宫产中使用组织粘合剂或缝线进行皮肤缝合的美容效果:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:112-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.02.009. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
2
Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.剖宫产皮肤缝合随机研究中的患者满意度与美容效果
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Nov;32(22):3830-3835. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1474870. Epub 2018 May 24.
3
Cosmetic outcomes of various skin closure methods following cesarean delivery: a randomized trial.剖宫产术后不同皮肤缝合方法的美容效果:一项随机试验。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;203(1):36.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
4
A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.一项比较急诊剖宫产术中使用“吻合钉”或“皮下缝合”进行皮肤缝合后的美容效果的随机对照试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Oct;290(4):655-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3274-9. Epub 2014 May 11.
5
Tissue adhesives for simple traumatic lacerations.用于简单外伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):222-4. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.222.
6
Different ways of subcutaneous tissue and skin closure at cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial on the long-term cosmetic outcome.剖宫产术不同皮下组织和皮肤缝合方式的随机临床试验:对长期美容效果的影响。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Aug;92(8):916-24. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12142. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
7
Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.皮下缝合与皮钉在剖宫产术后皮肤缝合中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):878-884. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a5f0c3.
8
Tissue Adhesive Compared With Sterile Strips After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.组织粘合剂与剖宫产术后无菌胶带比较:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):295-301. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003367.
9
Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.剖宫产术中皮肤缝合的技术与材料
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577.pub3.
10
Closure of skin incision after thyroidectomy through a supraclavicular approach: a comparison between tissue adhesive and staples.经锁骨入路甲状腺切除术后皮肤切口的缝合:组织粘合剂与缝线的比较。
Scand J Surg. 2013;102(4):234-40. doi: 10.1177/1457496913490610. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Stapler for corneal transplantation: a hypothesis.角膜移植吻合器:一种假说。
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025 May 10;14(1):239-246. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1515. eCollection 2025 Spring.