• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高龄桡骨远端骨折:来自瑞典骨折登记处的 8486 例观察性研究。

Distal radius fractures in the superelderly: an observational study of 8486 cases from the Swedish fracture register.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70182, Örebro, SE, Sweden.

Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Department of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg/Mölndal, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02825-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-02825-x
PMID:35183121
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8857784/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common fracture in adults. With an ageing population, the number of wrist fractures in the superelderly (≥ 80 years) is expected to rise. Optimal treatment for displaced DRFs remains controversial, especially in the superelderly group. In addition, basic knowledge of the outcome after a DRF in this heterogenic group is lacking. The aim of this study was to study injury characteristics, treatment and outcome of DRFs in superelderly patients using data from a large national register.

METHODS

We used prospectively collected data from the Swedish Fracture Register. All distal radius fractures registered between April 2012 and December 2018 in patients ≥ 80 years of age were included. Data on epidemiology, fracture type, trauma mechanism and treatment are registered by the physician treating the patient. Patients are also sent a subjective outcome questionnaire including EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA-score) at the time of injury and after 12 months. The 12-month questionnaire was sent to those who had completed the questionnaire at the time of injury. A Mann-Whitney U-test was used to assess differences between treatment methods.

RESULTS

Mean age for this population was 86 years (80-105 years), a majority of the patients were female (86.7%). The dominating injury mechanism was a simple fall (74.6%) in the patient's residence. The majority of fractures were AO type A (70%) followed by AO type C (20.9%) and type B (8.6%). The incidence of open fractures was significantly higher in females (2.6%) compared to males (1.5%). A majority of the fractures were treated with a cast (87.5%) with volar locking plate as the second most common treatment method (6.6%). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) EQ-5D, EQ-VAS and the Arm Hand Function Index of the SMFA-score deteriorated somewhat one year after injury compared to pre-injury. PROMs did not correlate to treatment with cast or a volar plate.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide register study provides detailed data on DRFs in the superelderly regarding epidemiology, treatment and self-reported outcome. A good self-reported outcome is possible, but many patients do not recover completely. PROMs did not correlate to type of treatment. The frequency of open fractures was significantly higher in females. The reason for this is unclear but different skin thickness in older males versus females may be one explanation.

摘要

背景

桡骨远端骨折(DRF)是成年人中最常见的骨折。随着人口老龄化,超级老年人(≥80 岁)手腕骨折的数量预计将会上升。对于移位的 DRF,最佳治疗方法仍存在争议,尤其是在超级老年人群中。此外,对于这个异质群体,DRF 后的基本结果知识还很缺乏。本研究的目的是使用大型国家登记处的数据,研究超级老年患者 DRF 的损伤特征、治疗和结果。

方法

我们使用瑞典骨折登记处前瞻性收集的数据。2012 年 4 月至 2018 年 12 月期间≥80 岁的所有桡骨远端骨折患者均纳入研究。医生治疗患者时,会记录流行病学、骨折类型、创伤机制和治疗等数据。患者在受伤时和 12 个月时还会收到包括 EQ-5D、EQ-VAS 和短肌肉骨骼功能评估问卷(SMFA 评分)在内的主观结果问卷。12 个月问卷寄给那些在受伤时已经完成问卷的人。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估治疗方法之间的差异。

结果

该人群的平均年龄为 86 岁(80-105 岁),大多数患者为女性(86.7%)。主要损伤机制为简单跌倒(74.6%),发生在患者居住场所。大多数骨折为 AO 型 A(70%),其次为 AO 型 C(20.9%)和 B 型(8.6%)。女性开放性骨折的发生率明显高于男性(2.6%比 1.5%)。大多数骨折采用石膏固定(87.5%),其次是掌侧锁定钢板(6.6%)。与受伤前相比,受伤 1 年后患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)EQ-5D、EQ-VAS 和 SMFA 评分的上肢手功能指数恶化。PROMs 与石膏或掌板治疗无相关性。

结论

这项全国性登记研究提供了有关超级老年人桡骨远端骨折的流行病学、治疗和自我报告结果的详细数据。自我报告的结果可能很好,但许多患者并未完全康复。PROMs 与治疗类型无关。女性开放性骨折的频率明显更高。原因尚不清楚,但老年男性与女性皮肤厚度不同可能是一个解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8e/8857784/9f4e2ef4e4f6/12877_2022_2825_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8e/8857784/9f4e2ef4e4f6/12877_2022_2825_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc8e/8857784/9f4e2ef4e4f6/12877_2022_2825_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Distal radius fractures in the superelderly: an observational study of 8486 cases from the Swedish fracture register.高龄桡骨远端骨折:来自瑞典骨折登记处的 8486 例观察性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02825-x.
2
Treatment and outcome of AO/OTA type C distal radius fractures: 12 199 fractures from the Swedish Fracture Register.瑞典骨折登记处的 AO/OTA 类型 C 桡骨远端骨折:12199 例骨折的治疗和结果。
Acta Orthop Belg. 2023 Jun;89(2):241-247. doi: 10.52628/89.2.11473.
3
Epidemiology, classification, treatment and mortality of distal radius fractures in adults: an observational study of 23,394 fractures from the national Swedish fracture register.成人桡骨远端骨折的流行病学、分类、治疗及死亡率:一项基于瑞典国家骨折登记处23394例骨折病例的观察性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 8;21(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3097-8.
4
Cast immobilization is non-inferior to volar locking plates in relation to QuickDASH after one year in patients aged 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial of displaced distal radius fractures.对于 65 岁及以上患者桡骨远端骨折,在一年后,与掌侧锁定钢板相比,石膏固定在 QuickDASH 方面无差异:一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):247-255. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0192.R2.
5
Can Generic Outcome Questionnaires Replace QuickDASH in Monitoring Clinical Outcome Following Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures?在桡骨远端骨折手术治疗后监测临床疗效时,通用结局问卷能否替代QuickDASH?
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Jan;47(1):92.e1-92.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
The CAST study protocol: a cluster randomized trial assessing the effect of circumferential casting versus plaster splinting on fracture redisplacement in reduced distal radius fractures in adults.CAST研究方案:一项整群随机试验,评估环形石膏固定与石膏夹板固定对成人桡骨远端骨折复位后骨折再移位的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 20;22(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04238-0.
7
Percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires versus volar locking plate fixation in adults with dorsally displaced fracture of distal radius: randomised controlled trial.经皮克氏针固定与掌侧锁定钢板固定治疗桡骨远端背侧移位骨折的成年人:随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2014 Aug 5;349:g4807. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4807.
8
Percutaneous fixation with Kirschner wires versus volar locking-plate fixation in adults with dorsally displaced fracture of distal radius: five-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.经皮克氏针固定与掌侧锁定钢板固定治疗桡骨远端背侧移位骨折的成年人:一项随机对照试验的 5 年随访。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):978-983. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2018-1285.R1.
9
[Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Ulna Fractures with Associated Distal Radius Fractures Treated by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation. Short-Term Functional and Radiographic Results].[采用切开复位内固定治疗合并桡骨远端骨折的尺骨远端骨折的钢板内固定。短期功能和影像学结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(5):369-76.
10
Cast immobilization versus volar locking plate fixation of AO type C distal radial fractures in patients aged 60 years and older.60岁及以上患者桡骨远端AO C型骨折的石膏固定与掌侧锁定钢板固定对比
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Jan;53(1):15-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the clinical outcomes of an innovative bi-frame external fixation device compared to those of volar locking plate and external fixator device among patients with unstable distal radius fractures: a two-year retrospective comparative cohort study.比较创新双框架外固定装置与掌侧锁定钢板及外固定器装置在桡骨远端不稳定骨折患者中的临床疗效:一项为期两年的回顾性比较队列研究。
Ann Med. 2025 Dec;57(1):2524090. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2025.2524090. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
2
Do Routine Postoperative Radiographs Influence the Management of Distal Radius Fractures Following Volar Locking Plate Fixation?常规术后X线片会影响桡骨远端骨折掌侧锁定钢板固定术后的治疗管理吗?
Cureus. 2024 Nov 18;16(11):e73960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73960. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3

本文引用的文献

1
30-day and 1-year mortality after skeletal fractures: a register study of 295,713 fractures at different locations.不同部位 295713 处骨折后 30 天和 1 年的死亡率:一项登记研究。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Dec;92(6):739-745. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1959003. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
2
Validity of classification of distal radial fractures in the Swedish fracture register.瑞典骨折登记处中桡骨远端骨折分类的有效性。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jun 26;22(1):587. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04473-5.
3
Completeness in the Swedish Fracture Register and the Swedish National Patient Register: An Assessment of Humeral Fracture Registrations.
Socioeconomic factors associated with poor patient-reported outcomes of 17,478 patients after a distal radial fracture.与17478例桡骨远端骨折患者报告的不良预后相关的社会经济因素。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2025 Jul;50(7):956-964. doi: 10.1177/17531934241293426. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
4
Impact of early rehabilitation therapy on functional outcomes in patients post distal radius fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期康复治疗对桡骨远端骨折术后患者功能结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Mar 5;25(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07317-0.
5
Teardrop Alignment Changes After Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures With Volar Ulnar Fragments.伴有掌侧尺骨碎片的桡骨远端骨折采用掌侧锁定钢板固定后的泪滴对线改变
Hand (N Y). 2024 Mar 4:15589447241233762. doi: 10.1177/15589447241233762.
6
Surgical options for distal radius fractures of type C in elderly patients over 65 years old: a comparison of external fixation with Kirschner wires and volar locking plate.老年患者(年龄>65 岁)C 型桡骨远端骨折的手术治疗选择:外固定架联合克氏针与掌侧锁定钢板的比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 9;18(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04162-0.
7
Can elderly patients regain their preoperative functional level after distal radius fracture type A? Results from a fracture register study using PROM.老年患者在A型桡骨远端骨折后能否恢复到术前的功能水平?一项使用患者报告结局量表的骨折登记研究结果
Front Surg. 2023 Apr 5;10:877252. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.877252. eCollection 2023.
8
Perioperative Morbidities in Distal Radius Fractures Treated Using Locking Plates in the Super-Elderly Population: A Retrospective Study.锁定钢板治疗超高龄人群桡骨远端骨折的围手术期并发症:一项回顾性研究
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2022 Dec 22;5(2):140-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.11.004. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
New Research on Distal Radius Fractures.桡骨远端骨折的新研究
Hand (N Y). 2022 Dec;17(1_suppl):5S. doi: 10.1177/15589447221144408.
瑞典骨折登记处和瑞典国家患者登记处的数据完整性:肱骨骨折登记情况评估
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 May 21;13:325-333. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S307762. eCollection 2021.
4
How deadly is a fracture distal to the hip in the elderly? An observational cohort study of 11,799 femoral fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.老年人髋部以下骨折的致命性有多高?瑞典骨折登记处对 11799 例股骨骨折的观察性队列研究。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):40-46. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1831236. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
5
Combined Plating of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures, a Consecutive Series of 74 Cases.关节内桡骨远端骨折的联合钢板固定术:74例连续病例系列
J Wrist Surg. 2020 Oct;9(5):388-395. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712503. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
Epidemiology, classification, treatment and mortality of distal radius fractures in adults: an observational study of 23,394 fractures from the national Swedish fracture register.成人桡骨远端骨折的流行病学、分类、治疗及死亡率:一项基于瑞典国家骨折登记处23394例骨折病例的观察性研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 8;21(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3097-8.
7
Epidemiology of Distal Radius Fixations and Functional Outcomes in the Superelderly Population.高龄人群桡骨远端骨折固定术的流行病学及功能转归
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2020 Mar;25(1):26-31. doi: 10.1142/S2424835520500034.
8
Epidemiological and Treatment Trends of Distal Radius Fractures across Multiple Age Groups.多年龄组桡骨远端骨折的流行病学及治疗趋势
J Wrist Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):305-311. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685205. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
9
Nonoperative Treatment Compared with Volar Locking Plate Fixation for Dorsally Displaced Distal Radial Fractures in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial.非手术治疗与掌侧锁定钢板固定治疗老年背侧移位桡骨远端骨折的随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jun 5;101(11):961-969. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00768.
10
Distal radius fractures-Regional variation in treatment regimens.桡骨远端骨折-治疗方案的地域差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 16;13(11):e0207702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207702. eCollection 2018.