• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists' Current Assessment and Treatment Practices.腰痛的物理治疗管理:物理治疗师当前评估与治疗实践的调查
Physiother Can. 2022 Jan 1;74(1):66-74. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0078. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
2
Current management of pregnancy-related low back pain: a national cross-sectional survey of U.K. physiotherapists.妊娠相关下腰痛的当前管理:英国物理治疗师的全国横断面调查
Physiotherapy. 2016 Mar;102(1):78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
3
Knowledge of and adherence to radiographic guidelines for low back pain: a survey of chiropractors in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.对加拿大纽芬兰和拉布拉多地区的脊医进行的一项调查显示,他们对下背痛的放射学指南的了解和遵循情况。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2021 Jan 18;29(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00361-2.
4
Adherence to key domains in low back pain guidelines: A cross-sectional study of Danish physiotherapists.坚持低腰背疼痛指南中的关键领域:丹麦物理治疗师的横断面研究。
Physiother Res Int. 2020 Oct;25(4):e1858. doi: 10.1002/pri.1858. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
5
Evidence-Based Practice for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Canadian Physiotherapists' Adherence, Beliefs, and Perspectives.非特异性下腰痛的循证实践:加拿大物理治疗师的依从性、信念及观点
Physiother Can. 2022 Jan 1;74(1):44-53. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0038. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
6
Physiotherapists' attitudes and beliefs about low back pain influence their clinical decisions and advice.物理治疗师对下背痛的态度和信念会影响他们的临床决策和建议。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021 Jun;53:102382. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102382. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
Management of low back pain by physical therapists in quebec: how are we doing?魁北克物理治疗师对腰痛的管理:我们做得如何?
Physiother Can. 2011 Fall;63(4):464-73. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2010-04P. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
8
Physiotherapists' use of advice and exercise for the management of chronic low back pain: a national survey.物理治疗师对慢性下腰痛管理中建议及运动疗法的运用:一项全国性调查。
Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
9
Self-management support for people with non-specific low back pain: A qualitative survey among physiotherapists and exercise therapists.非特异性下腰痛患者的自我管理支持:物理治疗师和运动治疗师的定性调查。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Dec;50:102269. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102269. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
10
Use and perceived added value of patient-reported measurement instruments by physiotherapists treating acute low back pain: a survey study among Dutch physiotherapists.治疗急性腰痛的物理治疗师对患者报告测量工具的使用及感知附加值:一项针对荷兰物理治疗师的调查研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Feb 24;21(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3132-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Confidence in providing primary care to patients with low back pain among physiotherapists.物理治疗师为腰痛患者提供初级护理的信心。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 6;26(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02850-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Physiotherapists' perceptions of learning and implementing a biopsychosocial intervention to treat musculoskeletal pain conditions: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.物理治疗师对学习和实施生物心理社会干预措施以治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛病症的认知:定性研究的系统评价与综合分析
Pain. 2020 Jun;161(6):1150-1168. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001809.
2
Do physical therapists follow evidence-based guidelines when managing musculoskeletal conditions? Systematic review.物理治疗师在管理肌肉骨骼疾病时是否遵循基于证据的指南?系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e032329. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032329.
3
Core outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain.非特异性下腰痛临床试验的核心结局测量工具。
Pain. 2018 Mar;159(3):481-495. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117.
4
Clinical guidelines for low back pain: A critical review of consensus and inconsistencies across three major guidelines.临床下背痛指南:对三大主要指南中一致性和不一致性的批判性回顾。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):968-980. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Physiotherapist-delivered cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective for low back pain, but can they be replicated in clinical practice? A systematic review.物理治疗师提供的认知行为干预对腰痛有效,但能否在临床实践中得到推广?一项系统综述。
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(1):1-9. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1236155. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Effective Conservative Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛的有效保守治疗
Semin Spine Surg. 2009 Dec 1;21(4):257-263. doi: 10.1053/j.semss.2009.08.009.
7
Physiotherapists' use of advice and exercise for the management of chronic low back pain: a national survey.物理治疗师对慢性下腰痛管理中建议及运动疗法的运用:一项全国性调查。
Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

腰痛的物理治疗管理:物理治疗师当前评估与治疗实践的调查

Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists' Current Assessment and Treatment Practices.

作者信息

Hall Amanda, Penney Tracy, Simmons Kathy, Peters Nicole, O'Brien Dana, Richmond Helen

机构信息

Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.

Ambulatory Care Physiotherapy, Eastern Health Regional Health Authority, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.

出版信息

Physiother Can. 2022 Jan 1;74(1):66-74. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0078. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

DOI:10.3138/ptc-2020-0078
PMID:35185250
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8816360/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine current physiotherapy practice for managing chronic low back pain (LBP). We administered a cross-sectional survey to all physiotherapists working in Eastern Health (EH) Regional Health Authority, Newfoundland and Labrador, by email. To ascertain how physiotherapists assessed and treated patients with LBP, the survey included multiple-choice and open-ended questions, along with case vignettes. We explored the respondents' confidence about implementing all aspects of guideline-based care, as well as their use of treatment outcome measures. A total of 76 physiotherapists responded to the survey (84% response rate); 56 (74%) reported that they treated patients with LBP as part of their regular practice. More than half had managed LBP for more than 10 years. The most frequently used treatments were self-management advice, followed by home and supervised exercise. The majority of respondents lacked confidence about implementing cognitive-behavioural treatment techniques. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale was the most commonly used outcome measure; disability outcome measures were not frequently used. The majority of LBP management in EH aligns with guideline recommendations. Increased uptake of guidelines recommending assessment and management of LBP using a bio-psychosocial approach will require training and support.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定目前管理慢性下腰痛(LBP)的物理治疗实践。我们通过电子邮件向在纽芬兰和拉布拉多省东部卫生(EH)地区卫生局工作的所有物理治疗师进行了横断面调查。为了确定物理治疗师如何评估和治疗LBP患者,该调查包括多项选择题、开放式问题以及病例 vignettes。我们探讨了受访者对实施基于指南的护理各个方面的信心,以及他们对治疗结果测量的使用情况。共有76名物理治疗师回复了调查(回复率为84%);56名(74%)报告称他们在日常工作中治疗LBP患者。超过一半的人管理LBP超过10年。最常用的治疗方法是自我管理建议,其次是家庭和监督下的锻炼。大多数受访者对实施认知行为治疗技术缺乏信心。数字疼痛评分量表是最常用的结果测量方法;残疾结果测量方法使用不频繁。EH地区的大多数LBP管理与指南建议一致。增加采用推荐使用生物心理社会方法评估和管理LBP的指南将需要培训和支持。