• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同耕作制度下夏玉米农田碳同位素分馏及其影响因素

Carbon isotope discrimination and the factors affecting it in a summer maize field under different tillage systems.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Key Laboratory of Crop Water Physiology and Drought Tolerance Germplasm Improvement of Ministry of Agriculture, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2022 Feb 11;10:e12891. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12891. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.12891
PMID:35186482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8842653/
Abstract

Based on two years of field experiments, under different soil tillage methods and straw management practices, which included conventional tillage (CT), subsoiling (SS), rotary tillage (RT), and no-tillage (NT), combined with either straw return (S) or straw removal (0), we characterized the dynamic changes in ΔC among three height layers [upper (U, 240 cm above the ground), middle (M, 120 cm above the ground), and lower (L, 30 cm above the ground)] of the summer maize canopy. The ΔC, the factors affecting it, and the relationships between ΔC and soil water content (SWC), the leaf area index (LAI), canopy microclimate, and the CO concentration were elucidated. The results indicated that the ΔC of summer maize at the pre-filling stage was greater than that at the post-filling stage. ΔC also varied at different heights, with the order of the ΔC values being L > U > M. Among the different tillage methods, the ΔC values were ordered SS > CT > RT > NT. SS and NT significantly increased the LAI; air temperature and relative humidity tended to gradually decrease with the increase in height of summer maize. Correlation analyses of the various influencing factors and ΔC showed that SWC, LAI, air temperature, and CO concentration were all positively correlated with ΔC, in which LAI and air temperature were significantly or extremely significantly positively correlated with ΔC. In addition, we show that ΔC can be used as a prediction index for summer maize yield, providing a theoretical basis for future yield research that may save precious time in summer maize breeding efforts.

摘要

基于两年的田间试验,在不同的土壤耕作方法和秸秆管理措施下,包括传统耕作(CT)、深松(SS)、旋耕(RT)和免耕(NT),结合秸秆还田(S)或秸秆移除(0),我们描述了夏季玉米冠层三个高度层[上层(U,距地面 240 厘米)、中层(M,距地面 120 厘米)和下层(L,距地面 30 厘米)]中ΔC 的动态变化。阐述了ΔC、影响ΔC 的因素以及ΔC 与土壤水分含量(SWC)、叶面积指数(LAI)、冠层微气候和 CO 浓度之间的关系。结果表明,夏玉米灌浆前ΔC 大于灌浆后ΔC。ΔC 也在不同高度处发生变化,ΔC 值的顺序为 L > U > M。在不同的耕作方法中,ΔC 值的顺序为 SS > CT > RT > NT。SS 和 NT 显著增加了 LAI;空气温度和相对湿度随着夏玉米高度的增加而逐渐降低。对各种影响因素与ΔC 的相关分析表明,SWC、LAI、空气温度和 CO 浓度均与ΔC 呈正相关,其中 LAI 和空气温度与ΔC 呈显著或极显著正相关。此外,我们表明ΔC 可以作为夏季玉米产量的预测指标,为未来的产量研究提供理论基础,这可能会在夏季玉米育种工作中节省宝贵的时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/a06fbbd69888/peerj-10-12891-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/9bab5f352ca1/peerj-10-12891-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/2e7109fded73/peerj-10-12891-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/873dc2d88f1c/peerj-10-12891-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/8f6ae947e6e0/peerj-10-12891-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/169f24286960/peerj-10-12891-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/3d259105742a/peerj-10-12891-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/a06fbbd69888/peerj-10-12891-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/9bab5f352ca1/peerj-10-12891-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/2e7109fded73/peerj-10-12891-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/873dc2d88f1c/peerj-10-12891-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/8f6ae947e6e0/peerj-10-12891-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/169f24286960/peerj-10-12891-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/3d259105742a/peerj-10-12891-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5f/8842653/a06fbbd69888/peerj-10-12891-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Carbon isotope discrimination and the factors affecting it in a summer maize field under different tillage systems.不同耕作制度下夏玉米农田碳同位素分馏及其影响因素
PeerJ. 2022 Feb 11;10:e12891. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12891. eCollection 2022.
2
CO fixation in above-ground biomass of summer maize under different tillage and straw management treatments.不同耕作和秸秆管理措施下夏玉米地上生物量的 CO2 固定。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 4;7(1):16888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17247-8.
3
Conservation tillage improves the yield of summer maize by regulating soil water, photosynthesis and inferior kernel grain filling on the semiarid Loess Plateau, China.保护性耕作通过调节土壤水分、光合作用和中国半干旱黄土高原夏玉米的籽粒灌浆来提高夏玉米产量。
J Sci Food Agric. 2022 Apr;102(6):2330-2341. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.11571. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
[Effects of subsoiling and straw returning on soil physical properties and maize production in Yellow River irrigation area of Gansu, China].[深松与秸秆还田对甘肃黄河灌区土壤物理性质及玉米产量的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jan 20;30(1):224-232. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.030.
5
[Effects of different straw recycling and tillage methods on soil respiration and microbial activity].不同秸秆还田与耕作方式对土壤呼吸及微生物活性的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Jun;26(6):1765-71.
6
[Effects of different tillage patterns on soil properties, maize yield and water use efficiency in Weibei Highland, China.].[不同耕作方式对中国渭北旱塬土壤性质、玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Feb;29(2):573-582. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201802.023.
7
The influence of a year-round tillage and residue management model on soil N fractions in a wheat-maize cropping system in central China.周年耕作和残茬管理模式对中国中部冬小麦-夏玉米轮作体系土壤氮素形态的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4767. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41409-5.
8
Soil Tillage Management Affects Maize Grain Yield by Regulating Spatial Distribution Coordination of Roots, Soil Moisture and Nitrogen Status.土壤耕作管理通过调节根系、土壤水分和氮素状况的空间分布协调性来影响玉米籽粒产量。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 22;10(6):e0129231. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129231. eCollection 2015.
9
Soil respiration, labile carbon pools, and enzyme activities as affected by tillage practices in a tropical rice-maize-cowpea cropping system.热带稻-玉米-豇豆种植系统中耕作方式对土壤呼吸、活性碳库和酶活性的影响
Environ Monit Assess. 2014 Jul;186(7):4223-36. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3693-x. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
10
[Effects of tillage with mulching on potato yield and the characteristics of soil water and temperature in arid area of southern Ningxia].[宁夏南部干旱区地膜覆盖耕作对马铃薯产量及土壤水热特性的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Dec;33(12):3352-3362. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202211.011.

本文引用的文献

1
Maize Canopy Apparent Photosynthesis and C-Photosynthate Reallocation in Response to Different Density and N Rate Combinations.玉米冠层表观光合作用及碳同化物再分配对不同密度和施氮量组合的响应
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Sep 19;10:1113. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01113. eCollection 2019.
2
Characterization of transformations of maize residues into soil organic matter.玉米残体向土壤有机质的转化特征。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;579:1843-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.169. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
3
Stable carbon isotope discrimination is under genetic control in the C4 species maize with several genomic regions influencing trait expression.
在C4作物玉米中,稳定碳同位素判别受遗传控制,有几个基因组区域影响该性状的表达。
Plant Physiol. 2014 Jan;164(1):131-43. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.224816. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
4
Changes in the structural composition and reactivity of Acer rubrum leaf litter tannins exposed to warming and altered precipitation: climatic stress-induced tannins are more reactive.在变暖及降水改变的条件下,糖槭叶凋落物单宁的结构组成和反应活性的变化:气候胁迫诱导的单宁更具反应活性。
New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(1):132-145. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03667.x. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
5
Post-photosynthetic fractionation of stable carbon isotopes between plant organs--a widespread phenomenon.植物器官间稳定碳同位素的光合后分馏——一种普遍现象。
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2005;19(11):1381-91. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1912.