Mirzoian E N
Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol. 1986 Feb;90(2):12-8.
Darwin's theory did not touch upon the problem of evolution of tissues. An attempt made by Heckel to explain phylogeny of tissues, basing on principles of selection and divergence, failed. It was not at once understood that evolution of separate levels of organization possessed certain specificity. The theory of parallelism, suggested by A. A. Zavarzin, stated the notion on specific regularities in evolution of tissues. Having analysed the correlation between the theory of evolution and evolutional histology, A. A. Zavarzin demonstrated that darwinism developed predominantly at the theory of speciation. This approach is correct for the period of the new evolutionary synthesis, too. The synthetic theory of evolution does not take into consideration evolution of tissues. A. A. Zavarzin's theory contributed to reorganization of methodology of the evolutional biology. The historical method was enriched by a certain principle on specific regularities of evolution for each level of organization in the alive. Simultaneously, the genesis of the parallelism theory discovered that correct explanation of the regularities in evolution of tissues is possible only under conditions that the evolution of histostructures can be inserted into the evolution of ontogenesis and species.
达尔文的理论并未涉及组织进化的问题。海克尔基于选择和分歧原则来解释组织系统发育的尝试失败了。人们并非立刻就明白不同组织层次的进化具有一定的特殊性。A. A. 扎瓦尔津提出的平行论,阐述了组织进化中特定规律的概念。A. A. 扎瓦尔津通过分析进化理论与进化组织学之间的关联,证明了达尔文主义主要是在物种形成理论方面得到发展。这种方法对于新的进化综合时期而言也是正确的。综合进化理论并未考虑组织的进化。A. A. 扎瓦尔津的理论推动了进化生物学方法论的重组。历史方法因关于生物每一组织层次进化特定规律的某种原则而得以丰富。同时,平行论的产生发现,只有在组织结构的进化能够融入个体发育和物种进化的条件下,才有可能正确解释组织进化的规律。