Suppr超能文献

线上、面对面还是混合式学习?新冠疫情期间教师与医学生的看法:一项混合方法研究。

Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students' Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.

作者信息

Atwa Hani, Shehata Mohamed Hany, Al-Ansari Ahmed, Kumar Archana, Jaradat Ahmed, Ahmed Jamil, Deifalla Abdelhalim

机构信息

Medical Education Unit, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.

Medical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 3;9:791352. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.791352. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 pandemic forced educational institutions to adopt online methods which were inevitable to keep continuity of education across all academia after suspension of traditional educational systems. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of faculty and students of online and face-to-face learning, and their preference of the mode of learning after the pandemic.

METHODS

This is a mixed-method study. Quantitative data was collected through a survey from 194 medical students and 33 faculty members, while qualitative data was collected through two focus group discussions with 9 students and another two with 13 faculty members. Quantitative variables were presented as means and standard deviations. Paired samples -test and Chi-square test were used. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was used to code, interpret, and make sense of data.

RESULTS

Mean scores of responses of faculty members and students were higher for face-to-face and blended learning compared to online learning in all survey statements with statistically significant differences. More than half of the students (53.1%) preferred the face-to-face mode of learning, while most of the faculty members (60.6%) preferred the blended mode of learning. Qualitative analysis identified five themes, namely: "Transforming the way theoretical teaching sessions are given," "Face-to-face teaching at campus cannot be replaced for some types of education," "Interaction in online sessions is limited," "Problems and challenges of online examinations," and "Technical issues and challenges of online education." It revealed suggestions that at least 30% of the curriculum could be taught online post-COVID-19. Some aspects of clinically oriented teaching including history taking and case discussions can also be delivered online in the future. Faculty members and students reported that dealing with online education was not difficult, although the transition was not smooth.

CONCLUSION

Medical students and faculty members were in favor of face-to-face and blended modes of learning. However, they perceived online mode of learning as an acceptable adaptation in theoretical teaching and in some clinically oriented teaching including history taking and clinical case discussions. Although face-to-face education in medicine is irreplaceable, the blended mode of learning remains an acceptable and practical solution for the post-COVID era.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情迫使教育机构采用在线教学方法,在传统教育系统暂停后,这对于保持所有学术领域的教育连续性而言是不可避免的。本研究的目的是探讨教师和学生对在线学习和面对面学习的体验,以及他们在疫情后对学习模式的偏好。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究。通过对194名医学生和33名教师进行调查收集定量数据,同时通过与9名学生进行的两次焦点小组讨论以及与13名教师进行的另外两次焦点小组讨论收集定性数据。定量变量以均值和标准差表示。使用配对样本t检验和卡方检验。对定性数据进行主题分析以对数据进行编码、解释和理解。

结果

在所有调查陈述中,与在线学习相比,教师和学生对面对面学习和混合式学习的回答平均得分更高,具有统计学显著差异。超过一半的学生(53.1%)更喜欢面对面学习模式,而大多数教师(60.6%)更喜欢混合式学习模式。定性分析确定了五个主题,即:“改变理论教学课程的授课方式”、“某些类型的教育无法取代校园内的面对面教学”、“在线课程中的互动有限”、“在线考试的问题和挑战”以及“在线教育的技术问题和挑战”。研究表明,新冠疫情后至少30%的课程可以在线授课。包括病史采集和病例讨论在内的一些临床导向教学方面未来也可以在线进行。教师和学生报告称,尽管过渡并不顺利,但应对在线教育并不困难。

结论

医学生和教师赞成面对面和混合式学习模式。然而,他们认为在线学习模式在理论教学以及包括病史采集和临床病例讨论在内的一些临床导向教学中是一种可接受的调整方式。虽然医学中的面对面教育不可替代,但混合式学习模式仍然是新冠疫情后时代一种可接受且实用的解决方案。

相似文献

1
Online, Face-to-Face, or Blended Learning? Faculty and Medical Students' Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 3;9:791352. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.791352. eCollection 2022.
4
Medical Students and Faculty Perceptions About Online Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: Alfaisal University Experience.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;10:880835. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.880835. eCollection 2022.
6
Blended learning in undergraduate dental education: a global pilot study.
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2171700. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2171700.
7
University students' preferences of learning modes post COVID-19-associated lockdowns: In-person, online, and blended.
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 19;19(7):e0296670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296670. eCollection 2024.
9
Blended learning across universities in a South-North-South collaboration: a case study.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Sep 2;14(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0136-x.
10

引用本文的文献

3
The impact of online teaching curricula on undergraduate basic surgical skills acquisition.
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Jun 6;27:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.06.002. eCollection 2025 Sep.
8
Data-driven natural computational psychophysiology in class.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2024 Dec;18(6):3477-3489. doi: 10.1007/s11571-024-10126-9. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
10
Nursing Students' Experiences and Challenges in Their Education During COVID 19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Method Study.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Aug 21;10:23779608241272484. doi: 10.1177/23779608241272484. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Step-by-step Guide to Create Competency-Based Assignments as an Alternative for Traditional Summative Assessment.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Jun 8;9:120. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000120.1. eCollection 2020.
2
The impact of COVID-19 on Medical education and Medical Students. How and when can they return to placements?
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Aug 5;9:159. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000159.1. eCollection 2020.
3
Transformation to learning from a distance.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Apr 23;9:76. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000076.1. eCollection 2020.
4
A vision of the use of technology in medical education after the COVID-19 pandemic.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Mar 26;9:49. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000049.1. eCollection 2020.
5
All hands on deck: early graduation of senior medical students in the COVID-19 pandemic.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 May 13;9:96. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000096.1. eCollection 2020.
6
7
How COVID-19 kick-started online learning in medical education-The DigiMed study.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 21;16(9):e0257394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257394. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验