• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机方法在致癌性评估中的应用

In Silico Methods for Carcinogenicity Assessment.

机构信息

Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2425:201-215. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_9.

DOI:10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_9
PMID:35188634
Abstract

Screening compounds for potential carcinogenicity is of major importance for prevention of environmentally induced cancers. A large sequence of predictive models, ranging from short-term biological assays (e.g., mutagenicity tests) to theoretical models, has been attempted in this field. Theoretical approaches such as (Q)SAR are highly desirable for identifying carcinogens, since they actively promote the replacement, reduction, and refinement of animal tests. This chapter reports and describes some of the most noted (Q)SAR models based on human expert knowledge and statistical approaches, aiming at predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals. Additionally, the performance of the selected models has been evaluated, and the results are interpreted in details by applying these predictive models to some pharmaceutical molecules.

摘要

筛选具有潜在致癌性的化合物对于预防环境诱导的癌症至关重要。在该领域,人们尝试了一系列从短期生物测定(例如,致突变试验)到理论模型的预测模型。(Q)SAR 等理论方法非常适合识别致癌物,因为它们积极促进动物试验的替代、减少和优化。本章报告并描述了一些基于人类专业知识和统计方法的最著名的(Q)SAR 模型,旨在预测化学品的致癌性。此外,还评估了所选模型的性能,并通过将这些预测模型应用于一些药物分子来详细解释结果。

相似文献

1
In Silico Methods for Carcinogenicity Assessment.计算机方法在致癌性评估中的应用
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2425:201-215. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_9.
2
In Silico Methods for Carcinogenicity Assessment.用于致癌性评估的计算机模拟方法
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1425:107-19. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3609-0_6.
3
Comparison of criteria used to access carcinogenicity in CPANN QSAR models versus the knowledge-based expert system Toxtree.CPANN QSAR模型中用于评估致癌性的标准与基于知识的专家系统Toxtree的比较。
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2014;25(6):423-41. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2014.898687. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
4
Integrated approach to testing and assessment for predicting rodent genotoxic carcinogenicity.用于预测啮齿动物遗传毒性致癌性的测试与评估综合方法。
J Appl Toxicol. 2016 Dec;36(12):1536-1550. doi: 10.1002/jat.3338. Epub 2016 May 25.
5
Development, Use, and Validation of (Q)SARs for Predicting Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity: Experiences from Italian National Institute of Health Activities.(Q)SARs 用于预测遗传毒性和致癌性的开发、使用和验证:意大利国家卫生研究所活动的经验。
Methods Mol Biol. 2025;2834:231-247. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4003-6_11.
6
Chemical structure of mutagens and carcinogens and the relationship with biological activity.诱变剂和致癌物的化学结构及其与生物活性的关系。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Mar;23(1):5-8.
7
International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Approaches to SAR in carcinogenesis and mutagenesis. Prediction of carcinogenicity/mutagenicity using MULTI-CASE.国际环境诱变剂和致癌物防护委员会。致癌作用和诱变作用中的构效关系方法。使用多案例预测致癌性/诱变性。
Mutat Res. 1994 Feb 1;305(1):33-46. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90124-4.
8
Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.致癌性和致突变性的预测模型:框架、现状与展望。
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2009 Apr;27(2):57-90. doi: 10.1080/10590500902885593.
9
Prediction of rodent carcinogenicity for 44 chemicals: results.44种化学物质的啮齿动物致癌性预测:结果
Mutagenesis. 1994 Jan;9(1):7-15. doi: 10.1093/mutage/9.1.7.
10
Evaluation of the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for predicting and profiling the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.评估 OECD(Q)SAR 应用工具箱和 Toxtree 预测和分析化学品致癌潜力。
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2010 Oct;21(7-8):731-52. doi: 10.1080/1062936X.2010.528598.

引用本文的文献

1
The VEGA Tool to Check the Applicability Domain Gives Greater Confidence in the Prediction of In Silico Models.VEGA 工具可用于检查适用域,从而提高对计算机模型预测结果的可信度。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 8;24(12):9894. doi: 10.3390/ijms24129894.

本文引用的文献

1
Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.体外哺乳动物细胞遗传毒性试验结果能否用于补充艾姆斯试验中的阳性结果,并有助于预测致癌或体内遗传毒性活性?II. 综合数据库的构建与分析。
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2014 Dec;775-776:69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
2
Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay: in silico methods, and the in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity assays.替代致癌性生物测定的方法:计算方法,以及体外和体内致突变性测定。
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010 Jul;6(7):809-19. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2010.486400.
3
Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.致癌性和致突变性的预测模型:框架、现状与展望。
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2009 Apr;27(2):57-90. doi: 10.1080/10590500902885593.
4
Structure-activity relationship analysis tools: validation and applicability in predicting carcinogens.构效关系分析工具:在预测致癌物方面的验证与适用性
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Feb;50(1):50-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
5
Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.一组三项体外遗传毒性试验鉴别啮齿动物致癌物和非致癌物能力的评估I. 敏感性、特异性和相对预测性
Mutat Res. 2005 Jul 4;584(1-2):1-256. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2005.02.004.
6
In silico predictive toxicology: the state-of-the-art and strategies to predict human health effects.计算机模拟预测毒理学:预测人类健康影响的现状与策略
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2005 Jan;8(1):27-31.
7
Data mining and machine learning techniques for the identification of mutagenicity inducing substructures and structure activity relationships of noncongeneric compounds.用于识别诱变性诱导子结构及非同类化合物构效关系的数据挖掘和机器学习技术。
J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Jul-Aug;44(4):1402-11. doi: 10.1021/ci034254q.