Suppr超能文献

体外哺乳动物细胞遗传毒性试验结果能否用于补充艾姆斯试验中的阳性结果,并有助于预测致癌或体内遗传毒性活性?II. 综合数据库的构建与分析。

Can in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results be used to complement positive results in the Ames test and help predict carcinogenic or in vivo genotoxic activity? II. Construction and analysis of a consolidated database.

作者信息

Kirkland David, Zeiger Errol, Madia Federica, Corvi Raffaella

机构信息

Kirkland Consulting, PO Box 79, Tadcaster LS24 0AS, United Kingdom.

Errol Zeiger Consulting, 800 Indian Springs Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA.

出版信息

Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2014 Dec;775-776:69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

Abstract

A Workshop sponsored by EURL ECVAM was held in Ispra, Italy in 2013 to consider whether the in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity test results could complement and mitigate the implications of a positive Ames test response for the prediction of in vivo genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and if patterns of results could be identified. Databases of Ames-positive chemicals that were tested for in vivo genotoxicity and/or carcinogenicity were collected from different sources and analysed individually (Kirkland et al., in this issue). Because there were overlaps and inconsistent test results among chemicals in the different databases, a combined database which eliminated the overlaps and evaluated the inconsistencies was considered preferable for addressing the above question. A database of >700 Ames-positive chemicals also tested in vivo was compiled, and the results in in vitro mammalian cell tests were analysed. Because the database was limited to Ames-positive chemicals, the majority (>85%) of carcinogens (103/119) and in vivo genotoxins (83/88) were positive when tested in both in vitro gene mutation and aneugenicity/clastogenicity tests. However, about half (>45%) of chemicals that were not carcinogenic (19/28) or genotoxic in vivo (33/73) also gave the same patterns of positive mammalian cell results. Although the different frequencies were statistically significant, positive results in 2 in vitro mammalian cell tests did not, per se, add to the predictivity of the positive Ames test. By contrast, negative results for both in vitro mammalian cell endpoints were rare for Ames-positive carcinogens (3/119) and in vivo genotoxins (2/88) but, were significantly more frequent for Ames-positive chemicals that are not carcinogenic (4/28) or genotoxic in vivo (14/73). Thus, in the case of an Ames-positive chemical, negative results in 2 in vitro mammalian cell tests covering both mutation and clastogenicity/aneugenicity endpoints should be considered as indicative of absence of in vivo genotoxic or carcinogenic potential.

摘要

欧洲替代方法验证参考实验室(EURL ECVAM)于2013年在意大利伊斯普拉举办了一次研讨会,探讨体外哺乳动物细胞遗传毒性试验结果能否补充并减轻艾姆斯试验阳性结果对体内遗传毒性和致癌性预测的影响,以及是否能识别出结果模式。从不同来源收集了经体内遗传毒性和/或致癌性测试的艾姆斯试验阳性化学品数据库,并分别进行分析(柯克兰等人,本期)。由于不同数据库中的化学品存在重叠且测试结果不一致,因此认为创建一个消除重叠并评估不一致性的综合数据库更适合解决上述问题。编制了一个包含700多种也经过体内测试的艾姆斯试验阳性化学品的数据库,并对体外哺乳动物细胞试验结果进行了分析。由于该数据库仅限于艾姆斯试验阳性化学品,大多数(>85%)致癌物(103/119)和体内遗传毒素(83/88)在体外基因突变试验和非整倍体/致断裂试验中均呈阳性。然而,约一半(>45%)在体内无致癌性(19/28)或无遗传毒性(33/7)的化学品在体外哺乳动物细胞试验中也呈现相同的阳性结果模式。尽管不同频率具有统计学意义,但体外两种哺乳动物细胞试验的阳性结果本身并未增加艾姆斯试验阳性结果的预测性。相比之下,艾姆斯试验阳性致癌物(3/119)和体内遗传毒素(2/88)在体外两种哺乳动物细胞试验终点均为阴性的情况很少见,但在体内无致癌性(4/28)或无遗传毒性(14/73)的艾姆斯试验阳性化学品中更为常见。因此,对于艾姆斯试验阳性的化学品,体外两种涵盖突变和致断裂性/非整倍体性终点的哺乳动物细胞试验结果为阴性,应被视为体内无遗传毒性或致癌潜力的指示。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验