Suppr超能文献

安全标签系统效率和安全性的评估:一项前瞻性模拟研究。

Evaluation of the Efficiency and Safety of a Safe Label System: A Prospective Simulation Study.

机构信息

From the Department of Anaesthesia, National University Hospital.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e568-e572. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000875.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our study aims to investigate the safety and efficiency of the Codonics Safe Label System (SLS) in a prospective simulation study.

METHODS

Three sets of simulated experiments involving 82 anesthetists were carried out on patient simulator mannequins. The primary outcome assessed through the simulated experiments was the effectiveness of the SLS in avoiding vial swap errors. Secondary outcomes analyzed included the efficacy of the SLS in preventing syringe swap and the difference in time taken to prepare standardized drugs as compared with conventional methods.

RESULTS

The SLS was associated with a significant reduction in all 4 stages of vial swap error. The incidence of wrong ampoule breakage was significantly lower in the SLS group compared with the conventional group (12.1% versus 38.5%, P = 0.007). The number of staff who drew the wrong ampoule was similarly lower in the SLS group compared with the conventional group (4.9% versus 33.3%, P = 0.001). The proportions of staff who eventually wrongly labeled the loaded syringe were 0% in the SLS group and 17.9% in the conventional group (P = 0.005).Drug preparation time was longer for the SLS group than for the conventional group (239.6 ± 45.9 versus 160.3 ± 46.5 seconds, P < 0.001).There was no significant difference in the incidence of syringe swap with the use of the SLS.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the SLS is effective in reducing vial swap error, but not syringe swap errors, and is associated with increased time taken for anesthetic drug preparation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过前瞻性模拟研究来探究 Codonics 安全标签系统(SLS)的安全性和有效性。

方法

在患者模拟人模型上进行了三组涉及 82 名麻醉师的模拟实验。通过模拟实验评估的主要结果是 SLS 避免瓶塞更换错误的有效性。分析的次要结果包括 SLS 预防注射器更换的效果以及与传统方法相比准备标准化药物所需的时间差异。

结果

SLS 与所有 4 个瓶塞更换错误阶段的显著减少相关。与传统组相比,SLS 组错误的安瓿破裂发生率明显较低(12.1%比 38.5%,P=0.007)。在 SLS 组中,抽取错误安瓿的工作人员数量也明显少于传统组(4.9%比 33.3%,P=0.001)。最终错误标记加载注射器的工作人员比例在 SLS 组中为 0%,在传统组中为 17.9%(P=0.005)。与传统组相比,SLS 组的药物准备时间更长(239.6±45.9 秒比 160.3±46.5 秒,P<0.001)。使用 SLS 并没有显著降低注射器更换的发生率。

结论

使用 SLS 可有效减少瓶塞更换错误,但不能减少注射器更换错误,并且与麻醉药物准备时间的增加相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验