Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Keck School of Medicine, Institute on Inequalities in Global Health, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 21;12(2):e054121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054121.
Novel mechanisms of service delivery are needed to expand access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. Providing PrEP directly through pharmacies could offer an additional option for reaching potential users.
We conducted a systematic review of studies examining effectiveness, values and preferences of end users and health workers, and cost of PrEP initiation and continuation through pharmacies (pharmacy access). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE through 2 December 2020. We also searched clinical trial registries and recent HIV conference abstracts. Standardised methods were used to search, screen and extract data from included studies.
No studies met the inclusion criteria for the effectiveness review, for either PrEP initiation or continuation. However, six 'case studies' presenting non-comparative data from PrEP pharmacy programmes demonstrated feasibility of this model in the USA. Eleven studies reported values and preferences of end users and health workers. In the USA, Kenya and South Africa, potential PrEP clients generally supported pharmacy access, although some preferred clinics. One study of PrEP pharmacy clients found all would 'definitely recommend' the programme. Six studies found pharmacists were generally supportive of offering PrEP; one study including doctors found more limited favour, while one study of diverse Kenyan stakeholders found broad support. Three studies reported cost data indicating client willingness to pay in the USA and Kenya and initial sustainability of a clinic financial model in the USA.
Provision of PrEP through pharmacies has been demonstrated to be feasible in the USA and acceptable to potential end users and stakeholders in multiple settings. Limited evidence on effectiveness and requirements for laboratory testing and assurance of high-quality services may limit enthusiasm for this approach. Further research is needed to determine if pharmacy access is a safe and effective way to help achieve global HIV prevention goals.
CRD42021231650.
需要新的服务提供机制来扩大获得艾滋病毒预防用暴露前预防(PrEP)的机会。通过药店直接提供 PrEP 可能是接触潜在使用者的另一种选择。
我们系统地回顾了评估 PrEP 通过药店获得(药房获取)的有效性、最终用户和卫生工作者的价值观和偏好,以及起始和持续成本的研究。我们在 2020 年 12 月 2 日之前检索了 PubMed、CINAHL、LILACS 和 EMBASE。我们还检索了临床试验注册处和最近的艾滋病会议摘要。使用标准方法从纳入研究中搜索、筛选和提取数据。
没有研究符合起始或持续使用 PrEP 的效果审查的纳入标准。然而,来自 PrEP 药房计划的六项“案例研究”提出了非比较数据,证明了该模式在美国的可行性。11 项研究报告了最终用户和卫生工作者的价值观和偏好。在美国、肯尼亚和南非,潜在的 PrEP 客户普遍支持药房获取,尽管有些人更喜欢诊所。一项对 PrEP 药房客户的研究发现,所有人都会“肯定推荐”该方案。六项研究发现药剂师普遍支持提供 PrEP;一项包括医生的研究发现,支持率有限,而一项对肯尼亚不同利益相关者的研究发现,支持率广泛。三项研究报告了成本数据,表明美国和肯尼亚的客户愿意支付费用,以及美国诊所财务模式的初步可持续性。
在美国,通过药店提供 PrEP 已被证明是可行的,并且在多个环境中受到潜在最终用户和利益相关者的认可。关于有效性的有限证据,以及对实验室检测的要求和对高质量服务的保证,可能会限制人们对这种方法的热情。需要进一步研究,以确定药房获取是否是实现全球艾滋病毒预防目标的一种安全有效的方法。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021231650。