Wang Hui-Hao, Zhan Hong-Sheng, Wang Cong, Deng Zhen, Wang Nan, Shi Meng, Chen Yuan-Chuan, Yu Zhong-Xiang
Shi's Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 Feb 25;35(2):166-71. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.02.015.
To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of manual therapy combined with posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical decompression(PECD) in the treatment of intractable cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.
From May 2016 to May 2018, 23 CSR patients who responded poorly to conservative treatment for at least 6 weeks underwent the combination management. Firstly, the patients received the posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical decompression routine care for the following 4 weeks and manual therapy for another 4 weeks. A total of 23 patients were followed up, including 14 males and 9 females, the age ranged from 29 to 78 years old with an average of (50.30±12.28) years, the course of disease was 3 to 24 months with an average of (9.74±5.76) months. The lesion segment involved C in 4 cases, C in 13 cases, C in 6 cases. The visual analogue scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), changes of cervical physiological curvature and interbody stability, adverse events were observed before and after operation. The follow-up time points were before operation, 1 day after operation and 1, 3 and 6 months after operation.
All patients successfully completed the operation and manual treatment for 4 to 8 times. Among the 29 cases, 23 patients were followed up for more than 6 months. There was no spinal cord and nerve root injury during the treatment and follow-up. Operation time was from 80 to 120 min with a median of 90 min;intraoperative blood loss was from 35 to 80 ml with a median of 50 ml. NDI, VAS of neck, shoulder and arm each period after operation were significantly lower than those before PECD(<0.05), while there were no significant improvement in cervical physiological curvature and target segment intervertebral space height(>0.05);there was no significant change in interbody stability (>0.05). After received the manual therapy, NDI significantly decreased (<0.05), however, there was no significant difference in VAS of neck, shoulder and arm, physiological curvature of cervical spine and intervertebral space height of target segment compared with that before manual treatment (>0.05);there was no significant change in interbody stability (>0.05).
Manual therapy combined with PECD in the treatment of intractable cervical spondylotic radiculopathy can not only quickly improve the symptoms, but also alleviate the residual symptoms after PECD safely and effectively, and can not cause obvious signs of accelerated instability of cervical adjacent segments in the short term.
探讨手法治疗联合后路经皮内镜下颈椎减压术(PECD)治疗顽固性神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效及安全性。
选取2016年5月至2018年5月间23例经至少6周保守治疗效果不佳的神经根型颈椎病患者行联合治疗。首先,患者接受后路经皮内镜下颈椎减压术常规治疗4周,之后再接受4周手法治疗。共23例患者获得随访,其中男性14例,女性9例;年龄29~78岁,平均(50.30±12.28)岁;病程3~24个月,平均(9.74±5.76)个月。病变节段累及C4 4例,C5 13例,C6 6例。观察手术前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)、颈椎生理曲度及椎间稳定性变化、不良事件发生情况。随访时间点为术前、术后1天、术后1、3、6个月。
所有患者均顺利完成手术及4~8次手法治疗。29例患者中,23例获随访6个月以上。治疗及随访期间无脊髓及神经根损伤发生。手术时间80~120分钟,中位数90分钟;术中出血量35~80毫升,中位数50毫升。术后各时期NDI、颈部及肩臂部VAS均显著低于PECD术前(<0.05),而颈椎生理曲度及目标节段椎间隙高度无明显改善(>0.05);椎间稳定性无明显变化(>0.05)。接受手法治疗后,NDI显著降低(<0.05),但颈部及肩臂部VAS、颈椎生理曲度及目标节段椎间隙高度与手法治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05);椎间稳定性无明显变化(>0.05)。
手法治疗联合PECD治疗顽固性神经根型颈椎病,不仅能迅速改善症状,还能安全有效地缓解PECD术后残留症状,且短期内不会引起颈椎相邻节段明显的加速失稳征象。