Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023 Apr;8(2):188-197. doi: 10.1177/23800844211071111. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
To estimate the association between safety perception on vaccine acceptance and adoptions of risk mitigation strategies among dental health care workers (DHCWs).
A survey was emailed to DHCWs in the New Jersey area from December 2020 to January 2021. Perceived safety from regular SARS-CoV-2 testing of self, coworkers, and patients and its association with vaccine hesitancy and risk mitigation were ascertained. Risk Mitigation Strategy (RiMS) scores were computed from groupings of office measures: 1) physical distancing (reduced occupancy, traffic flow, donning of masks, minimal room crowding), 2) personal protective equipment (fitted for N95; donning N95 masks; use of face shields; coverings for head, body, and feet), and 3) environmental disinfection (suction, air filtration, ultraviolet, surface wiping).
SARS-CoV-2 testing of dental professionals, coworkers, and patients were perceived to provide safety at 49%, 55%, and 68%, respectively. While dentists were least likely to feel safe with regular self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 ( < 0.001) as compared with hygienists and assistants, they were more willing than hygienists ( = 0.004; odds ratio, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.21 to 2.66]) and assistants ( < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.93 to 5.71]) to receive the vaccine. RiMS scores ranged from 0 to 19 for 467 participants (mean [SD], 10.9 [2.9]). RiMS scores did not significantly differ among groups of DHCWs; however, mean RiMS scores were higher among those who received or planned to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than those with who did not ( = 0.004). DHCWs who felt safer with regular testing had greater RiMS scores than those who did not (11.0 vs. 10.3, = 0.01).
Understanding DHCWs' perception of risk and safety is crucial, as it likely influences attitudes toward testing and implementation of office risk mitigation policies. Clinical studies that correlate risk perception and RiMS with SARS-CoV-2 testing are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of RiMS in dental care settings.
Educators, clinicians, and policy makers can use the results of this study when improving attitudes toward testing and implementation of risk mitigation policies within dental offices, for current and future pandemics.
评估牙科医护人员(DHCWs)对疫苗接受度的安全感知与风险缓解策略采用之间的关联。
2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,向新泽西地区的 DHCWs 发送了一份调查。确定了医护人员对自身、同事和患者的常规 SARS-CoV-2 检测安全性的感知,以及其与疫苗犹豫和风险缓解之间的关联。通过对办公措施进行分组,计算了风险缓解策略(RiMS)评分:1)身体距离(降低入住率、交通流量、佩戴口罩、减少房间拥挤),2)个人防护设备(适配 N95;佩戴 N95 口罩;使用面罩;覆盖头部、身体和脚部),3)环境消毒(抽吸、空气过滤、紫外线、表面擦拭)。
分别有 49%、55%和 68%的牙科专业人员、同事和患者认为常规 SARS-CoV-2 检测可提供安全性。与卫生师和助理相比,牙医对常规 SARS-CoV-2 自我检测的安全性最不放心(<0.001),但他们比卫生师(=0.004;比值比,1.79[95%CI,1.21 至 2.66])和助理(<0.001;比值比,3.32[95%CI,1.93 至 5.71])更愿意接种疫苗。467 名参与者的 RiMS 评分范围为 0 至 19(平均值[标准差],10.9[2.9])。不同牙科医护人员群体的 RiMS 评分无显著差异;然而,已接种或计划接种 COVID-19 疫苗的医护人员的 RiMS 评分高于未接种疫苗的医护人员(=0.004)。与不认为常规检测安全的医护人员相比,认为常规检测安全的医护人员的 RiMS 评分更高(11.0 比 10.3,=0.01)。
了解牙科医护人员对风险和安全的感知至关重要,因为这可能会影响他们对检测和实施办公风险缓解政策的态度。需要进行临床研究来关联风险感知和 RiMS 与 SARS-CoV-2 检测,以证明 RiMS 在牙科环境中的有效性。
教育工作者、临床医生和政策制定者可以在改善当前和未来大流行期间牙科办公室内的检测态度和风险缓解政策实施时,使用本研究的结果。