Suppr超能文献

医护人员对安全问题的感知对疫苗接受度和风险缓解策略的采用的影响。

Impact of DHCWs' Safety Perception on Vaccine Acceptance and Adoption of Risk Mitigation Strategies.

机构信息

Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.

Rutgers School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA.

出版信息

JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023 Apr;8(2):188-197. doi: 10.1177/23800844211071111. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the association between safety perception on vaccine acceptance and adoptions of risk mitigation strategies among dental health care workers (DHCWs).

METHODS

A survey was emailed to DHCWs in the New Jersey area from December 2020 to January 2021. Perceived safety from regular SARS-CoV-2 testing of self, coworkers, and patients and its association with vaccine hesitancy and risk mitigation were ascertained. Risk Mitigation Strategy (RiMS) scores were computed from groupings of office measures: 1) physical distancing (reduced occupancy, traffic flow, donning of masks, minimal room crowding), 2) personal protective equipment (fitted for N95; donning N95 masks; use of face shields; coverings for head, body, and feet), and 3) environmental disinfection (suction, air filtration, ultraviolet, surface wiping).

RESULTS

SARS-CoV-2 testing of dental professionals, coworkers, and patients were perceived to provide safety at 49%, 55%, and 68%, respectively. While dentists were least likely to feel safe with regular self-testing for SARS-CoV-2 ( < 0.001) as compared with hygienists and assistants, they were more willing than hygienists ( = 0.004; odds ratio, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.21 to 2.66]) and assistants ( < 0.001; odds ratio, 3.32 [95% CI, 1.93 to 5.71]) to receive the vaccine. RiMS scores ranged from 0 to 19 for 467 participants (mean [SD], 10.9 [2.9]). RiMS scores did not significantly differ among groups of DHCWs; however, mean RiMS scores were higher among those who received or planned to receive the COVID-19 vaccine than those with who did not ( = 0.004). DHCWs who felt safer with regular testing had greater RiMS scores than those who did not (11.0 vs. 10.3, = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding DHCWs' perception of risk and safety is crucial, as it likely influences attitudes toward testing and implementation of office risk mitigation policies. Clinical studies that correlate risk perception and RiMS with SARS-CoV-2 testing are needed to demonstrate the effectiveness of RiMS in dental care settings.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT

Educators, clinicians, and policy makers can use the results of this study when improving attitudes toward testing and implementation of risk mitigation policies within dental offices, for current and future pandemics.

摘要

目的

评估牙科医护人员(DHCWs)对疫苗接受度的安全感知与风险缓解策略采用之间的关联。

方法

2020 年 12 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,向新泽西地区的 DHCWs 发送了一份调查。确定了医护人员对自身、同事和患者的常规 SARS-CoV-2 检测安全性的感知,以及其与疫苗犹豫和风险缓解之间的关联。通过对办公措施进行分组,计算了风险缓解策略(RiMS)评分:1)身体距离(降低入住率、交通流量、佩戴口罩、减少房间拥挤),2)个人防护设备(适配 N95;佩戴 N95 口罩;使用面罩;覆盖头部、身体和脚部),3)环境消毒(抽吸、空气过滤、紫外线、表面擦拭)。

结果

分别有 49%、55%和 68%的牙科专业人员、同事和患者认为常规 SARS-CoV-2 检测可提供安全性。与卫生师和助理相比,牙医对常规 SARS-CoV-2 自我检测的安全性最不放心(<0.001),但他们比卫生师(=0.004;比值比,1.79[95%CI,1.21 至 2.66])和助理(<0.001;比值比,3.32[95%CI,1.93 至 5.71])更愿意接种疫苗。467 名参与者的 RiMS 评分范围为 0 至 19(平均值[标准差],10.9[2.9])。不同牙科医护人员群体的 RiMS 评分无显著差异;然而,已接种或计划接种 COVID-19 疫苗的医护人员的 RiMS 评分高于未接种疫苗的医护人员(=0.004)。与不认为常规检测安全的医护人员相比,认为常规检测安全的医护人员的 RiMS 评分更高(11.0 比 10.3,=0.01)。

结论

了解牙科医护人员对风险和安全的感知至关重要,因为这可能会影响他们对检测和实施办公风险缓解政策的态度。需要进行临床研究来关联风险感知和 RiMS 与 SARS-CoV-2 检测,以证明 RiMS 在牙科环境中的有效性。

知识转移陈述

教育工作者、临床医生和政策制定者可以在改善当前和未来大流行期间牙科办公室内的检测态度和风险缓解政策实施时,使用本研究的结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of DHCWs' Safety Perception on Vaccine Acceptance and Adoption of Risk Mitigation Strategies.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023 Apr;8(2):188-197. doi: 10.1177/23800844211071111. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
3
US dental health care workers' mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2022 Aug;153(8):740-749. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2022.02.011.
6
AIDS and dental practice.
J Public Health Dent. 1988 Spring;48(2):68-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1988.tb03167.x.
7
Estimating COVID-19 prevalence and infection control practices among US dentists.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Nov;151(11):815-824. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2020.09.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-tests for COVID-19: What is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023).
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;4(2):e0002336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002336. eCollection 2024.
3
Social Justice in Dental Research.
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2023 Apr;8(2):108-109. doi: 10.1177/23800844231158258.
4
Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance among Dental Professionals: A Multi-Country Survey.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Sep 26;10(10):1614. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101614.
6
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 screening to augment dental office and patient safety.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2022 May;153(5):399-402. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

3
Testing for COVID-19 in dental offices: Mechanism of action, application, and interpretation of laboratory and point-of-care screening tests.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Jul;152(7):514-525.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.04.019. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
One-Year Update on Salivary Diagnostic of COVID-19.
Front Public Health. 2021 May 21;9:589564. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.589564. eCollection 2021.
6
Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0253007. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253007. eCollection 2021.
7
Genomic Surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 Variants Circulating in the United States, December 2020-May 2021.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jun 11;70(23):846-850. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7023a3.
8
Epidemiology Characteristics of COVID-19 Infection Amongst Primary Health Care Workers in Qatar: March-October 2020.
Front Public Health. 2021 May 20;9:679254. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679254. eCollection 2021.
9
Will Healthcare Workers Accept a COVID-19 Vaccine When It Becomes Available? A Cross-Sectional Study in China.
Front Public Health. 2021 May 20;9:664905. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.664905. eCollection 2021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验