• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 的免疫荧光检测法的建立。

Development of an immunofluorescence assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

机构信息

The Department of Infectious Diseases, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness-Ziona, Israel.

The Department of Biotechnology, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness-Ziona, Israel.

出版信息

Arch Virol. 2022 Apr;167(4):1041-1049. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05392-z. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00705-022-05392-z
PMID:35192015
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8862410/
Abstract

SARS-CoV-2, the etiologic agent of the COVID-19 pandemic, emerged as the cause of a global crisis in 2019. Currently, the main method for identification of SARS-CoV-2 is a reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay designed to detect viral RNA in oropharyngeal (OP) or nasopharyngeal (NP) samples. While the PCR assay is considered highly specific and sensitive, this method cannot determine the infectivity of the sample, which may assist in evaluation of virus transmissibility from patients and breaking transmission chains. Thus, cell-culture-based approaches such as cytopathic effect (CPE) assays are routinely employed for the identification of infectious viruses in NP/OP samples. Despite their high sensitivity, CPE assays take several days and require additional diagnostic tests in order to verify the identity of the pathogen. We have therefore developed a rapid immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for the specific detection of SARS-CoV-2 in NP/OP samples following cell culture infection. Initially, IFA was carried out on Vero E6 cultures infected with SARS-CoV-2 at defined concentrations, and infection was monitored at different time points. This test was able to yield positive signals in cultures infected with 10 pfu/ml at 12 hours postinfection (PI). Increasing the incubation time to 24 hours reduced the detectable infective dose to 1 pfu/ml. These IFA signals occur before the development of CPE. When compared to the CPE test, IFA has the advantages of specificity, rapid detection, and sensitivity, as demonstrated in this work.

摘要

SARS-CoV-2,COVID-19 大流行的病原体,于 2019 年成为全球危机的原因。目前,鉴定 SARS-CoV-2 的主要方法是逆转录(RT)-PCR 检测,用于检测口咽(OP)或鼻咽(NP)样本中的病毒 RNA。虽然 PCR 检测被认为具有高度特异性和敏感性,但该方法不能确定样本的传染性,这可能有助于评估患者病毒的传播能力并阻断传播链。因此,细胞培养为基础的方法,如细胞病变效应(CPE)检测,通常用于鉴定 NP/OP 样本中的传染性病毒。尽管 CPE 检测具有很高的灵敏度,但需要数天的时间,并且需要进行额外的诊断测试才能验证病原体的身份。因此,我们开发了一种快速免疫荧光检测(IFA),用于鉴定 NP/OP 样本中的 SARS-CoV-2,在细胞培养感染后进行。最初,IFA 是在感染 SARS-CoV-2 的 Vero E6 培养物上进行的,在不同时间点监测感染情况。该检测方法能够在感染 10 pfu/ml 后 12 小时(PI)的培养物中产生阳性信号。将孵育时间延长至 24 小时,可将可检测的感染剂量降低至 1 pfu/ml。这些 IFA 信号出现在 CPE 发展之前。与 CPE 检测相比,IFA 具有特异性、快速检测和灵敏度的优势,如本工作所示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/11b31edb0d38/705_2022_5392_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/ce948f9d5771/705_2022_5392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/68bd19b0bf85/705_2022_5392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/f126650df737/705_2022_5392_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/5231e995c139/705_2022_5392_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/39678b4fd7a5/705_2022_5392_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/11b31edb0d38/705_2022_5392_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/ce948f9d5771/705_2022_5392_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/68bd19b0bf85/705_2022_5392_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/f126650df737/705_2022_5392_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/5231e995c139/705_2022_5392_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/39678b4fd7a5/705_2022_5392_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e388/8862410/11b31edb0d38/705_2022_5392_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of an immunofluorescence assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2.用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 的免疫荧光检测法的建立。
Arch Virol. 2022 Apr;167(4):1041-1049. doi: 10.1007/s00705-022-05392-z. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
A Multiplex One-Step RT-qPCR Protocol to Detect SARS-CoV-2 in NP/OP Swabs and Saliva.一种用于检测 NP/OP 拭子和唾液中 SARS-CoV-2 的多重一步法 RT-qPCR 方案。
Curr Protoc. 2021 May;1(5):e145. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.145.
3
Predicting infectivity: comparing four PCR-based assays to detect culturable SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples.预测传染性:比较四种基于 PCR 的检测方法在临床样本中检测可培养 SARS-CoV-2 的效果。
EMBO Mol Med. 2022 Feb 7;14(2):e15290. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202115290. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
4
Clinical evaluation of a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individual and pooled upper respiratory tract samples.用于检测个体和混合上呼吸道样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的多重实时 RT-PCR 检测的临床评估。
Arch Virol. 2021 Sep;166(9):2551-2561. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-05148-1. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
5
Accuracy of a nucleocapsid protein antigen rapid test in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.核衣壳蛋白抗原快速检测在 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断中的准确性。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):289.e1-289.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.09.057. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
6
Coupling immuno-magnetic capture with LC-MS/MS(MRM) as a sensitive, reliable, and specific assay for SARS-CoV-2 identification from clinical samples.将免疫磁珠捕获与 LC-MS/MS(MRM)相结合,从临床样本中鉴定 SARS-CoV-2,建立一种灵敏、可靠且特异的方法。
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022 Feb;414(5):1949-1962. doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03831-5. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
7
Lack of active SARS-CoV-2 virus in a subset of PCR-positive COVID-19 congregate care patients.在部分聚合酶链反应(PCR)阳性的 COVID-19 群居护理患者中未发现活跃的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)病毒。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Aug;141:104879. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104879. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
8
Diagnostic usefulness of subgenomic RNA detection of viable SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.亚基因组 RNA 检测在 COVID-19 患者中对活 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断价值。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Jan;28(1):101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.009. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
9
A Novel Immunofluorescence Assay for the Rapid Serological Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.一种用于快速血清学检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的新型免疫荧光检测法。
Viruses. 2021 Apr 24;13(5):747. doi: 10.3390/v13050747.
10
Viral culture and immunofluorescence for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in RT-PCR positive respiratory samples.病毒培养和免疫荧光法检测 RT-PCR 阳性呼吸道样本中的 SARS-CoV-2 感染性。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Jul;152:105167. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105167. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of the RealTime SARS-CoV-2 quantitative Laboratory Developed Test and correlation with viral culture as a measure of infectivity.实时 SARS-CoV-2 定量实验室自建检测方法的建立及其与病毒培养的相关性作为传染性的衡量标准。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Oct;143:104945. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104945. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
2
Mice with induced pulmonary morbidities display severe lung inflammation and mortality following exposure to SARS-CoV-2.诱导患有肺部疾病的小鼠在接触 SARS-CoV-2 后会出现严重的肺部炎症和死亡。
JCI Insight. 2021 Jun 22;6(12):145916. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.145916.
3
A Novel Immunofluorescence Assay for the Rapid Serological Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
一种用于快速血清学检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的新型免疫荧光检测法。
Viruses. 2021 Apr 24;13(5):747. doi: 10.3390/v13050747.
4
Specific and Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Identification Based on LC-MS/MS Analysis.基于液相色谱-串联质谱分析的特异性快速严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型鉴定
ACS Omega. 2021 Jan 26;6(5):3525-3534. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04691. eCollection 2021 Feb 9.
5
Evaluating ELISA, Immunofluorescence, and Lateral Flow Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Serologic Assays.评估酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、免疫荧光法和侧向流动分析法用于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)血清学检测的效果。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Dec 11;11:597529. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.597529. eCollection 2020.
6
Evaluating the serological status of COVID-19 patients using an indirect immunofluorescent assay, France.使用间接免疫荧光法评估 COVID-19 患者的血清学状态,法国。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;40(2):361-371. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04104-2. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
7
Repeated Coronavirus Disease 2019 Molecular Testing: Correlation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Culture With Molecular Assays and Cycle Thresholds.多次新型冠状病毒病 2019 分子检测:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 培养与分子检测和循环阈值的相关性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 16;73(4):e860-e869. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1616.
8
Cell-based Culture Informs Infectivity and Safe De-Isolation Assessments in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019.基于细胞的培养可用于告知 2019 冠状病毒病患者的传染性和安全解除隔离评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e2952-e2959. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1579.
9
Transmission and prevention of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 的传播与预防。
Biochem Soc Trans. 2020 Oct 30;48(5):2307-2316. doi: 10.1042/BST20200693.
10
The Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection.对新型冠状病毒感染的抗体反应。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 27;7(9):ofaa387. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa387. eCollection 2020 Sep.