Suppr超能文献

为什么患者会因初级保健类型的问题前往急诊部:在偏远社区工作的医疗保健提供者的观点。

Why patients attend emergency department for primary care type problems: views of healthcare providers working in a remote community.

机构信息

Centre for Rural and Remote Health, James Cook University, Mount Isa, Queensland, Australia; and Institute for Social Science Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Centre for Rural and Remote Health, James Cook University, Mount Isa, Queensland, Australia

出版信息

Rural Remote Health. 2022 Feb;22(1):7054. doi: 10.22605/RRH7054. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Emergency department (ED) utilisation continues to increase, particularly for primary care presentations that do not require high level ED services. The reasons for this are complex, and research has focused on patient perspectives in choosing where to seek care rather than those of ED and general practitioner (GP) providers. This study aimed to address this gap by exploring the views of ED and GP providers regarding ED utilisation for primary care type health conditions in a small, remote Australian city with perhaps unique population demographics and service configuration.

METHODS

Service providers from the ED and general practice clinics were invited to participate in focus groups and semi-structured interviews exploring their views on ED utilisation for primary-care-type health presentations. The data were analysed using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 24 healthcare providers (five GPs, seven ED practitioners, seven community nurse navigators, four Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers and one Indigenous Liaison Officer) participated in focus groups discussion and interviews. The analysis identified three themes: access and logistic barriers, rational decision-making and self-perceived urgency. While there was some overlap in the healthcare providers' perceptions, there were also strong differences between ED and GP groups. In particular, the ED group believed that GP services are less accessible for urgent appointments, whereas GPs believed that such arrangements were in place. Both groups agreed on the need for clear communication between the ED and general practice.

CONCLUSION

ED and GP providers demonstrate similarities and differences in understanding patients' reasons for choosing which service to access. The differences may stem from ED providers' focus on offering a rapid resolution of acute presentations and GP providers' focus on offering comprehensive and continuing care. Effective communication between general practice and the ED services and clearer referral pathways may help in reducing ED utilisation for less urgent primary-care-type problems.

摘要

简介

急诊科(ED)的就诊量持续增加,尤其是对于不需要高水平 ED 服务的初级保健就诊。造成这种情况的原因很复杂,研究主要集中在患者选择就诊地点的角度,而不是 ED 和全科医生(GP)提供者的角度。本研究旨在通过探索 ED 和全科诊所的服务提供者对澳大利亚一个小而偏远城市初级保健类型健康状况的 ED 就诊利用情况的看法来填补这一空白,该城市的人口统计数据和服务配置可能具有独特性。

方法

邀请 ED 和全科诊所的服务提供者参加焦点小组和半结构化访谈,探讨他们对 ED 就诊利用情况的看法。使用主题内容分析对数据进行分析。

结果

共有 24 名医疗保健提供者(5 名全科医生、7 名 ED 医生、7 名社区护士导航员、4 名土著和托雷斯海峡岛民卫生工作者和 1 名土著联络官)参加了焦点小组讨论和访谈。分析确定了三个主题:获取和物流障碍、理性决策和自我感知的紧迫性。尽管医疗保健提供者的看法有一些重叠,但 ED 和全科医生组之间也存在很大差异。特别是,ED 组认为 GP 服务在紧急预约时不太容易获得,而全科医生则认为已经有了这样的安排。两组都认为 ED 和全科之间需要进行清晰的沟通。

结论

ED 和 GP 提供者在理解患者选择就诊服务的原因方面表现出相似性和差异。差异可能源于 ED 提供者专注于快速解决急性就诊问题,而全科医生则专注于提供全面和持续的护理。ED 服务和更明确的转诊途径之间的有效沟通可能有助于减少 ED 对不太紧急的初级保健类型问题的利用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验