Schütze Heike, Jackson Pulver Lisa, Harris Mark
School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, 2522, NSW, Australia.
Office of the Pro-Vice Chancellor - Engagement and Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Leadership, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, 2751, NSW, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 31;17(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2017-6.
Indigenous peoples experience worse health and die at younger ages than their non-indigenous counterparts. Ethnicity data enables health services to identify inequalities experienced by minority populations and to implement and monitor services specifically targeting them. Despite significant Government intervention, Australia's Indigenous peoples, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, continue to be under identified in data sets. We explored the barriers to Indigenous status identification in urban general practice in two areas in Sydney.
A mixed-methods multiple-site case study was used, set in urban general practice. Data collection included semi-structured interviews and self-complete questionnaires with 31 general practice staff and practitioners, interviews with three Medicare Local staff, and focus groups with the two local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in the study areas. These data were combined with clinical record audit data and Aboriginal unannounced standardised patient visits to participating practices to determine the current barriers to Indigenous status identification in urban general practice.
Findings can be broadly grouped into three themes: a lack of practitioner/staff understanding on the need to identify Indigenous status or that a problem with identification exists; suboptimal practice systems to identify and/or record patients' Indigenous status; and practice environments that do not promote Indigenous status identification.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples remain under-identified in general practice. There is a need to address the lack of practitioner and staff recognition that a problem with Indigenous status identification exists, along with entrenched attitudes and beliefs and limitations to practice software capabilities. Guidelines recommending Indigenous status identification and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-specific Practice Incentive Payments have had limited impact on Indigenous status identification rates. It is likely that policy change mandating Indigenous status identification and recording in general practice will also be required.
与非原住民相比,原住民健康状况更差,死亡年龄更小。种族数据能使卫生服务机构识别少数族裔人群所经历的不平等情况,并实施和监督专门针对他们的服务。尽管政府进行了大量干预,但澳大利亚的原住民,即澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民,在数据集中的识别率仍然较低。我们在悉尼的两个地区探讨了城市全科医疗中识别原住民身份的障碍。
采用多地点混合方法案例研究,研究背景为城市全科医疗。数据收集包括对31名全科医疗工作人员和从业者进行半结构化访谈和自我填写问卷,对三名医疗保险地方工作人员进行访谈,以及与研究区域内的两个当地原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区进行焦点小组讨论。这些数据与临床记录审计数据以及原住民未宣布的标准化患者访视参与诊所的数据相结合,以确定城市全科医疗中目前识别原住民身份的障碍。
研究结果大致可分为三个主题:从业者/工作人员对识别原住民身份的必要性或存在识别问题缺乏了解;识别和/或记录患者原住民身份的实践系统欠佳;以及不利于识别原住民身份的实践环境。
在全科医疗中,澳大利亚原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的身份识别率仍然较低。有必要解决从业者和工作人员对存在原住民身份识别问题缺乏认识的情况,以及根深蒂固的态度和观念,还有实践软件功能的局限性。推荐识别原住民身份以及针对原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的实践激励支付的指南,对原住民身份识别率的影响有限。可能还需要政策变革,强制要求在全科医疗中识别和记录原住民身份。