German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity research - iDiv - Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Computer Science, Martin Luther University-Halle Wittenberg, 06099 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Biol Lett. 2022 Feb;18(2):20210554. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0554. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Changes in the abundances of animals, such as with the ongoing concern about insect declines, are often assumed to be general across taxa. However, this assumption is largely untested. Here, we used a database of assemblage-wide long-term insect and arachnid monitoring to compare abundance trends among co-occurring pairs of taxa. We show that 60% of co-occurring taxa qualitatively showed long-term trends in the same direction-either both increasing or both decreasing. However, in terms of magnitude, temporal trends were only weakly correlated (mean freshwater = 0.05 (±0.03), mean terrestrial = 0.12 (±0.09)). The strongest correlation was between trends of beetles and those of moths/butterflies ( = 0.26). Overall, even though there is some support for directional similarity in temporal trends, we find that changes in the abundance of one taxon provide little information on the changes of other taxa. No clear candidate for umbrella or indicator taxa emerged from our analysis. We conclude that obtaining a better picture of changes in insect abundances will require monitoring of multiple taxa, which remains uncommon, especially in the terrestrial realm.
动物丰度的变化,如持续关注的昆虫减少,通常被认为是跨分类群的普遍现象。然而,这种假设在很大程度上未经检验。在这里,我们使用了一个关于整个群落范围的长期昆虫和蛛形纲动物监测的数据库,比较了共同出现的分类群之间的丰度趋势。我们表明,60%的共同出现的分类群在长期趋势上定性地朝着相同的方向发展——要么都在增加,要么都在减少。然而,就幅度而言,时间趋势相关性很弱(淡水平均值 = 0.05(±0.03),陆地平均值 = 0.12(±0.09))。甲虫和蛾/蝴蝶之间的趋势相关性最强( = 0.26)。总体而言,尽管时间趋势的方向相似性有一定的支持,但我们发现一个分类群的丰度变化几乎不能提供其他分类群变化的信息。我们的分析没有出现伞形或指示分类群的明确候选者。我们得出结论,要更好地了解昆虫丰度的变化,需要对多个分类群进行监测,这在陆地领域尤其罕见。