Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jul;32(7):4954-4966. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08542-8. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
To investigate the validity of the Interventional Ultrasound Skills Evaluation (IUSE) tool for assessment of procedural competence in ultrasound-guided procedures in a clinical environment, including a pass/fail score.
Novices and experienced radiologists were recruited from four hospitals and were observed and assessed while performing ultrasound-guided procedures. Performances were assessed using the IUSE tool by two independent raters. Validity evidence was gathered in accordance with Messick's framework: response process was ensured by standardisation of written rater instructions. Internal structure was explored using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency reliability; inter-rater reliability was calculated as Pearson's r independently across all ratings, and test-retest reliability was reported using Cronbach's alpha. Relationship to other variables was investigated by comparing performances of the participants in each group. Consequences evidence was explored by calculating a pass/fail standard using the contrasting groups method.
Six novices and twelve experienced radiologists were enrolled. The IUSE tool had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96, high inter-rater reliability (Pearson's r = 0.95), and high test-retest reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98), and the mean score was 33.28 for novices and 59.25 for experienced with a highly significant difference (p value < 0.001). The pass/fail score was set at 55 resulting in no false positives or false negatives.
Validity evidence from multiple sources supports the use of the IUSE tool for assessment of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures in a clinical environment and its use in high-stakes assessment such as certification. A credible pass/fail criterion was established to inform decision-making.
• A multi-site validity investigation established that the Interventional Ultrasound Skills Evaluation (IUSE) tool can be used to assess procedural competence in ultrasound-guided procedures. • Validity evidence was gathered according to Messick's framework validity from the following sources: response process, internal structure, relationship to other variables, and consequences evidence. • The IUSE tool can be used for both formative and summative assessment, and a credible pass/fail score was established to help inform decision-making such as certification.
研究介入超声技能评估(IUSE)工具在临床环境中评估超声引导程序操作能力的有效性,包括通过/不通过评分。
从四家医院招募新手和经验丰富的放射科医生,观察并评估他们在进行超声引导程序时的表现。两名独立的评分者使用 IUSE 工具进行评估。根据 Messick 的框架收集有效性证据:通过标准化书面评分者说明来确保反应过程。使用 Cronbach's alpha 探索内部结构的内部一致性可靠性;独立计算所有评分的皮尔逊 r 进行组内评分者间可靠性,使用 Cronbach's alpha 报告重测信度。通过比较每组参与者的表现来研究与其他变量的关系。通过对比组方法计算通过/不通过标准来探索后果证据。
共纳入 6 名新手和 12 名经验丰富的放射科医生。IUSE 工具具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.96),组内评分者间可靠性高(Pearson's r = 0.95),重测信度高(Cronbach's alpha = 0.98),新手平均得分为 33.28,经验丰富的医生得分为 59.25,差异具有统计学意义(p 值<0.001)。通过/不通过的分数设定为 55,没有假阳性或假阴性。
来自多个来源的有效性证据支持在临床环境中使用 IUSE 工具评估超声引导程序的能力,并支持在认证等高风险评估中使用。建立了一个可靠的通过/不通过标准来为决策提供信息。
多站点有效性研究表明,介入超声技能评估(IUSE)工具可用于评估超声引导程序中的操作能力。
根据 Messick 的有效性框架收集证据,包括反应过程、内部结构、与其他变量的关系和后果证据。
IUSE 工具可用于形成性和总结性评估,并建立了可靠的通过/不通过分数,以帮助为认证等决策提供信息。