Allocating Homeless Services After the Withdrawal of the Vulnerability Index-Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool.
作者信息
Shinn Marybeth, Richard Molly K
机构信息
Marybeth Shinn and Molly K. Richard are with Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 2022 Mar;112(3):378-382. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306628.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Allocating Homeless Services After the Withdrawal of the Vulnerability Index-Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool.在撤出脆弱性指数-服务优先排序决策辅助工具后分配无家可归者服务。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Mar;112(3):378-382. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306628.
2
Review of programs for persons who are homeless and mentally ill.针对无家可归且患有精神疾病者的项目综述。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;8(5):242-50.
3
Latent homeless risk profiles of a national sample of homeless veterans and their relation to program referral and admission patterns.全国无家可归退伍军人样本的潜在无家可归风险概况及其与项目转介和入院模式的关系。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S239-47. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301322. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
4
Homeless adult individuals and their shelter network.
New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1986 Jun(30):15-26. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319863004.
5
Housing stability and recovery among chronically homeless persons with co-occuring disorders in Washington, DC.华盛顿特区共病慢性 homeless 人群的住房稳定性和恢复。
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jan;102(1):13-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300320.
6
Impact of an integrated service system on client outcomes by gender in a national sample of a mentally ill homeless population.在一个全国性的精神疾病无家可归人群样本中，综合服务系统对不同性别的服务对象结局的影响。
Gend Med. 2008 Dec;5(4):395-404. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2008.10.003.
7
Homeless veterans: perspectives on social services use.
Soc Work. 1997 Jan;42(1):19-30. doi: 10.1093/sw/42.1.19.
8
Services for homeless pregnant women: lessons from the field.为无家可归的孕妇提供的服务：来自实地的经验教训。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1995 Oct;65(4):492-501. doi: 10.1037/h0079677.
9
Community support systems for the homeless mentally ill.
New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1986 Jun(30):27-42. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319863005.
10
Understanding Innovation in Homeless Service Provision: A Study of Frontline Providers' Values-Readiness for Change.理解无家可归者服务提供方面的创新：对一线服务提供者改变价值观准备度的研究。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019 Sep;46(5):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00943-0.
引用本文的文献
1
Programmatic and Organizational Barriers and Facilitators to Addressing High-Risk Issues in Supportive Housing and Housing First Programs.解决支持性住房和“住房第一”项目中高风险问题的规划与组织障碍及促进因素
Community Ment Health J. 2025 May;61(4):661-673. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01373-5. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
Community- and data-driven homelessness prevention and service delivery: optimizing for equity.社区和数据驱动的 homelessness 预防和服务提供：实现公平优化。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 May 19;30(6):1032-1041. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad052.
3
Initial Development of the Activity Card Sort-Advancing Inclusive Participation from a Homeless Population Perspective.活动卡片分类的初步开发——从无家可归者群体视角推进包容性参与
Occup Ther Int. 2020 Jul 3;2020:9083082. doi: 10.1155/2020/9083082. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Development of a homelessness risk screening tool for emergency department patients.开发一种用于急诊科患者的 homelessness 风险筛查工具。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr;57(2):285-293. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13886. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
2
Categorized Priority Systems: A New Tool for Fairly Allocating Scarce Medical Resources in the Face of Profound Social Inequities.分类优先系统：面对深刻社会不平等时公平分配稀缺医疗资源的新工具。
Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):1294-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.12.019. Epub 2020 Dec 26.
3
What Interventions Work Best for Families Who Experience Homelessness? Impact Estimates from the Family Options Study.哪些干预措施最适合经历无家可归的家庭？家庭选择研究的影响估计。
J Policy Anal Manage. 2018;37(4):735-66.
4
The ethics of expanding access to cheaper, less effective treatments.扩大获得更便宜但效果较差治疗方法的可及性的伦理问题。
Lancet. 2016 Aug 27;388(10047):932-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01025-9. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
5
Effect of scattered-site housing using rent supplements and intensive case management on housing stability among homeless adults with mental illness: a randomized trial.利用租金补贴和强化个案管理分散安置住房对无家可归的精神病成年人住房稳定性的影响：一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 3;313(9):905-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1163.
6
One-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of housing first with ACT in five Canadian cities.在加拿大五个城市开展的“先安置后强化个案管理”随机对照试验的一年期结果。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 May 1;66(5):463-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400167. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
7
Leaving Homelessness Behind: Housing Decisions among Families Exiting Shelter.告别无家可归：走出庇护所的家庭的住房决策
Hous Policy Debate. 2014 Jan 1;24(2):364-386. doi: 10.1080/10511482.2013.852603.
8
Efficient targeting of homelessness prevention services for families.高效针对家庭的无家可归预防服务。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S324-30. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301468. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
9
Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions.稀缺医疗干预措施的分配原则。
Lancet. 2009 Jan 31;373(9661):423-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60137-9.
Zotero 插件