Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Healthforce Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Aug;25(4):509-516. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0306. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
Health care organizations increasingly recognize the impact of social needs on health outcomes. As organizations develop and scale efforts to address social needs, little is known about the optimal role for clinicians in providing social care. In this study, the authors aimed to understand how health care organizations involve clinicians in formal social care efforts. In 2019, the authors conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with administrators at 29 health care organizations. Interviews focused on the development and implementation of formal social care programs within the health care organization and the role of clinicians within those programs. A few administrators described formal roles for primary care clinicians in organizational efforts to deliver social care. Administrators frequently described programs that were deliberately structured to shield clinicians (eg, clinicians were not expected to review social risk screening results or be involved in addressing social needs). The authors identified 4 ways that administrators felt clinicians could meaningfully engage in social care programs: (1) discuss social risks to strengthen relationships with patients; (2) adjust clinical care follow-up plans based on social risks; (3) modify prescriptions based on social risks; and (4) refer patients to other care team members who can directly assist with social risks. Administrators were hesitant to increase primary care clinicians' responsibilities by tasking them with social care activities. Defining appropriate and scalable roles for clinicians along with adequate support from other care team members may increase the effectiveness of social care programs.
医疗机构越来越认识到社会需求对健康结果的影响。随着组织制定和扩大努力以解决社会需求,人们对临床医生在提供社会关怀方面的最佳角色知之甚少。在这项研究中,作者旨在了解医疗机构如何让临床医生参与正式的社会关怀工作。2019 年,作者对 29 家医疗机构的 29 名管理人员进行了 33 次半结构化访谈。访谈重点是在医疗机构内制定和实施正式的社会关怀计划,以及临床医生在这些计划中的角色。一些管理人员描述了初级保健临床医生在组织提供社会关怀工作中的正式角色。管理人员经常描述那些经过精心设计以保护临床医生的计划(例如,不期望临床医生审查社会风险筛查结果或参与解决社会需求)。作者确定了管理员认为临床医生可以在社会关怀计划中进行有意义的参与的 4 种方式:(1)讨论社会风险以加强与患者的关系;(2)根据社会风险调整临床护理随访计划;(3)根据社会风险修改处方;(4)将患者转介给其他可以直接协助处理社会风险的护理团队成员。管理人员不愿意通过让初级保健临床医生承担社会关怀活动来增加他们的责任。为临床医生定义适当和可扩展的角色,并得到其他护理团队成员的充分支持,可能会提高社会关怀计划的效果。