J Vis Exp. 2022 Feb 23(180). doi: 10.3791/6493.
An erratum was issued for: Drosophila Passive Avoidance Behavior as a New Paradigm to Study Associative Aversive Learning. The Representative Results and Discussion sections were updated. In the Representative Results, the legend for Figure 5 was updated from: Figure 5: Comparison of passive avoidance and grooming behavior in D. simulans males and females. (A) Average latency (s) per trial. The graph shows no statistically significant differences between males and females in the latencies. (B) An average number of received shocks per trial. The graph shows no statistically significant differences between males and females in the number of received shocks. (C) The total duration of grooming bouts in trials 1-3. While there were no statistically significant differences between males and females, the female flies showed a considerable increase in grooming behavior during trials 2 and 3 compared to trial 1. Abbreviations: *- P<0.05. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. to: Figure 5: Comparison of passive avoidance and grooming behavior in D. simulans males and females. (A) Average latency (s) per trial. The graph shows no statistically significant differences between males and females in the latencies. (B) An average number of received shocks per trial. The graph shows no statistically significant differences between males and females in the number of received shocks. (C) The total duration of grooming bouts in trials 1-3. While there were no statistically significant differences between males and females, the female flies showed a considerable decrease in grooming behavior during trials 2 and 3 compared to trial 1. Abbreviations: *- P<0.05. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test. In the Discussion, the third paragraph was updated from: The assay worked equally well in D. melanogaster and D. simulans male and female flies, demonstrating that the paradigm could be adapted to different D. species. The changes in fly behavior characterized by increased latencies and decreased number of shocks were statistically significant in the second trial and would strengthen with subsequent trials. Interestingly, if naïve flies were habituated to the apparatus without electric shock, they would enter the upper compartment a little faster on the second and the third trials. However, the decrease in latencies was not statistically significant (data not shown). No statistically significant differences were observed between sexes, although female flies had somewhat longer latencies and received slightly more shocks. This difference could be due to a combination of factors, including females' failure to associate the shock with the upper compartment, a stronger geotaxis, or possibly because females are slightly larger and slower than males. The total duration of grooming bouts was significantly higher in the second and third trials in female flies, which draws a parallel between D. and rodent anxiety-like behaviors. to: The assay worked equally well in D. melanogaster and D. simulans male and female flies, demonstrating that the paradigm could be adapted to different D. species. The changes in fly behavior characterized by increased latencies and decreased number of shocks were statistically significant in the second trial and would strengthen with subsequent trials. Interestingly, if naïve flies were habituated to the apparatus without electric shock, they would enter the upper compartment a little faster on the second and the third trials. However, the decrease in latencies was not statistically significant (data not shown). No statistically significant differences were observed between sexes, although female flies had somewhat longer latencies and received slightly more shocks. This difference could be due to a combination of factors, including females' failure to associate the shock with the upper compartment, a stronger geotaxis, or possibly because females are slightly larger and slower than males. The total duration of grooming bouts was significantly lower in the second and third trials in female flies, which draws a parallel between D. and rodent anxiety-like behaviors.
《果蝇被动回避行为作为研究联想性厌恶学习的新范式》。“代表性结果”和“讨论”部分已更新。在“代表性结果”中,图5的图例更新如下:原内容为“图5:拟果蝇雄性和雌性的被动回避和梳理行为比较。(A)每次试验的平均潜伏期(秒)。该图显示雄性和雌性在潜伏期上无统计学显著差异。(B)每次试验接受电击的平均次数。该图显示雄性和雌性在接受电击次数上无统计学显著差异。(C)第1 - 3次试验中梳理行为的总持续时间。虽然雄性和雌性之间无统计学显著差异,但雌性果蝇在第2次和第3次试验中与第1次试验相比,梳理行为有显著增加。缩写:* - P<0.05。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验。”更新为“图5:拟果蝇雄性和雌性的被动回避和梳理行为比较。(A)每次试验的平均潜伏期(秒)。该图显示雄性和雌性在潜伏期上无统计学显著差异。(B)每次试验接受电击的平均次数。该图显示雄性和雌性在接受电击次数上无统计学显著差异。(C)第1 - 3次试验中梳理行为的总持续时间。虽然雄性和雌性之间无统计学显著差异,但雌性果蝇在第2次和第3次试验中与第1次试验相比,梳理行为有显著减少。缩写:* - P<0.05。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验。”在“讨论”中,第三段更新如下:原内容为“该实验在黑腹果蝇和拟果蝇的雄性和雌性果蝇中均表现良好,表明该范式可适用于不同的果蝇物种。以潜伏期增加和电击次数减少为特征的果蝇行为变化在第二次试验中具有统计学显著性,并会在后续试验中增强。有趣的是,如果未经训练的果蝇在无电击的情况下适应该装置,它们在第二次和第三次试验中进入上部隔室的速度会稍快一些。然而,潜伏期的减少无统计学显著性(数据未显示)。虽然雌性果蝇的潜伏期稍长且接受的电击稍多,但未观察到性别之间有统计学显著差异。这种差异可能是多种因素共同作用的结果,包括雌性未能将电击与上部隔室联系起来、更强的趋地性,或者可能是因为雌性比雄性稍大且稍慢。雌性果蝇在第二次和第三次试验中梳理行为持续时间显著更高,这在果蝇和啮齿动物的焦虑样行为之间建立了联系。”更新为“该实验在黑腹果蝇和拟果蝇的雄性和雌性果蝇中均表现良好,表明该范式可适用于不同的果蝇物种。以潜伏期增加和电击次数减少为特征的果蝇行为变化在第二次试验中具有统计学显著性,并会在后续试验中增强。有趣的是,如果未经训练的果蝇在无电击的情况下适应该装置,它们在第二次和第三次试验中进入上部隔室的速度会稍快一些。然而,潜伏期的减少无统计学显著性(数据未显示)。虽然雌性果蝇的潜伏期稍长且接受的电击稍多,但未观察到性别之间有统计学显著差异。这种差异可能是多种因素共同作用的结果,包括雌性未能将电击与上部隔室联系起来、更强的趋地性,或者可能是因为雌性比雄性稍大且稍慢。雌性果蝇在第二次和第三次试验中梳理行为持续时间显著更低,这在果蝇和啮齿动物的焦虑样行为之间建立了联系。”