Department of Infectious Diseases, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, United States of America.
Department of Hospital Medicine, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, West Virginia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 23;17(2):e0264301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264301. eCollection 2022.
Remdesivir (RDV) reduces time to clinical improvement in hospitalized COVID -19 patients requiring supplemental oxygen. Dexamethasone improves survival in those requiring oxygen support. Data is lacking on the efficacy of combination therapy in patients on mechanical ventilation. We analyzed for comparative outcomes between Corticosteroid (CS) therapy with combined Corticosteroid and Remdesivir (CS-RDV) therapy. We conducted an observational cohort study of patients aged 18 to 90 with COVID-19 requiring ventilatory support using TriNetX (COVID-19 Research Network) between January 20, 2020, and February 9, 2021. We compared patients who received at least 48 hours of CS-RDV combination therapy to CS monotherapy. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality rates in propensity-matched (PSM) cohorts. Secondary outcomes were Length of Stay (LOS), Secondary Bacterial Infections (SBI), and MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus), and Pseudomonas infections. We used univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and stratified log-rank tests. Of 388 patients included, 91 (23.5%) received CS-RDV therapy, and 297 (76.5%) received CS monotherapy. After propensity score matching, with 74 patients in each cohort, all-cause mortality was 36.4% and 29.7% in the CS-RDV and CS therapy, respectively (P = 0.38). We used a Kaplan-Meier with a log-rank test on follow up period (P = 0.23), and a Hazards Ratio model (P = 0.26). SBI incidence was higher in the CS group (13.5% vs. 35.1%, P = 0.02) with a similar LOS (13.4 days vs. 13.4 days, P = 1.00) and similar incidence of MRSA/Pseudomonas infections (13.5% vs. 13.5%, P = 1.00) in both the groups. Therefore, CS-RDV therapy is non-inferior to CS therapy in reducing 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality but associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of SBI in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
瑞德西韦(RDV)可缩短需要补充氧气的住院 COVID-19 患者的临床改善时间。地塞米松可提高需要氧支持的患者的生存率。关于机械通气患者联合治疗的疗效数据尚缺乏。我们分析了皮质类固醇(CS)治疗与 CS 联合瑞德西韦(CS-RDV)治疗之间的比较结果。我们使用 TriNetX(COVID-19 研究网络)对 2020 年 1 月 20 日至 2021 年 2 月 9 日期间需要通气支持的 18 至 90 岁 COVID-19 患者进行了观察性队列研究。我们比较了接受至少 48 小时 CS-RDV 联合治疗和 CS 单药治疗的患者。主要结局是倾向匹配(PSM)队列的 28 天全因死亡率。次要结局是住院时间(LOS)、继发性细菌性感染(SBI)、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和铜绿假单胞菌感染。我们使用单变量和多变量 Cox 比例风险模型和分层对数秩检验。在纳入的 388 例患者中,91 例(23.5%)接受 CS-RDV 治疗,297 例(76.5%)接受 CS 单药治疗。在进行倾向评分匹配后,每组各有 74 例患者,CS-RDV 和 CS 治疗组的全因死亡率分别为 36.4%和 29.7%(P = 0.38)。我们在随访期间使用 Kaplan-Meier 对数秩检验(P = 0.23)和风险比模型(P = 0.26)。CS 组的 SBI 发生率较高(13.5% vs. 35.1%,P = 0.02),两组 LOS(13.4 天 vs. 13.4 天,P = 1.00)和 MRSA/铜绿假单胞菌感染发生率相似(13.5% vs. 13.5%,P = 1.00)。因此,CS-RDV 治疗在降低 28 天院内全因死亡率方面不劣于 CS 治疗,但与 COVID-19 危重症患者 SBI 发生率显著降低相关。