Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Yunnan, China.
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ann Bot. 2022 Apr 13;129(5):541-554. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac025.
The defensive role of spines has previously been related to leaves, young shoots and reproductive organs. However, some woody species harbour spines on their trunks where none of those organs are present. Several explanations are plausible: they could be (1) climbing aids, (2) remnants from defence of leaves or reproductive organs during an earlier development phase, or (3) an as-yet undescribed defence. Here we investigate whether they could play a role against either bark feeding or preventing climbing animals accessing food resources in the tree canopy.
We described 31 woody species with spines on their trunk, growing in a botanical garden, to test whether morphological strategies could be identified and suggest what could be their most likely function. As testing their function is difficult experimentally for large pools of species, we performed virtual experiments to evaluate the potential roles of trunk spines against bark removal and climbing animals of different sizes. We then compared for each species and their confamilial non-spiny species the nutritional profiles of leaf, bark and reproductive organs to test whether trunk spines were associated with a nutritious organ (more likely targeted by herbivores).
We identified four morphological syndromes of trunk spines. Two corresponded to already known functions (anchorage for lianas and crown defence against large ground mammals), and two strategies are newly described trait syndromes with traits suggesting a defence against bark feeding and climbing mammals. By simulation, we show how each strategy could translate into defence against debarking and prevent herbivores from climbing.
We identified trunk spine strategies and the criteria to classify them, their most likely function and the likely feeding mode and size of animal against which different trunk spine strategies may be effective. We discuss further perspectives for testing their function and their ecological significance.
刺的防御作用先前与叶子、嫩枝和生殖器官有关。然而,一些木本植物在树干上长有刺,而这些器官都不存在。有几种解释是合理的:它们可能是(1)攀援辅助物,(2)在早期发育阶段防御叶子或生殖器官的残余物,或者(3)一种尚未描述的防御方式。在这里,我们研究它们是否可能在防止树皮取食或阻止攀援动物获取树冠食物资源方面发挥作用。
我们描述了生长在植物园中的 31 种具有树干刺的木本植物,以检验是否可以识别出形态策略,并提出其最可能的功能。由于对大量物种进行实验测试其功能很困难,因此我们进行了虚拟实验,以评估树干刺对树皮去除和不同大小的攀援动物的潜在作用。然后,我们比较了每个物种及其同科非刺物种的叶子、树皮和生殖器官的营养特征,以检验树干刺是否与有营养的器官(更有可能成为食草动物的目标)相关联。
我们确定了树干刺的四种形态综合征。两种对应于已知的功能(藤本植物的锚固和树冠防御大型地面哺乳动物),另外两种策略是新描述的性状综合征,具有防御树皮取食和攀援哺乳动物的特征。通过模拟,我们展示了每种策略如何转化为对树皮取食的防御,并防止食草动物攀爬。
我们确定了树干刺的策略和对它们进行分类的标准、它们最可能的功能以及不同树干刺策略可能有效的食草动物的可能取食模式和大小。我们讨论了进一步测试其功能和生态意义的前景。