James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Geriatrics Research Education & Clinical Center, Bronx, NY, 10468, USA.
Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4054-4061. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07397-5. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
Health information exchange (HIE) notifications when patients experience cross-system acute care encounters offer an opportunity to provide timely transitions interventions to improve care across systems.
To compare HIE notification followed by a post-hospital care transitions intervention (CTI) with HIE notification alone.
Cluster-randomized controlled trial with group assignment by primary care team.
Veterans 65 or older who received primary care at 2 VA facilities who consented to HIE and had a non-VA hospital admission or emergency department visit between 2016 and 2019.
For all subjects, real-time HIE notification of the non-VA acute care encounter was sent to the VA primary care provider. Subjects assigned to HIE plus CTI received home visits and telephone calls from a VA social worker for 30 days after arrival home, focused on patient activation, medication and condition knowledge, patient-centered record-keeping, and follow-up.
Primary outcome: 90-day hospital admission or readmission.
emergency department visits, timely VA primary care team telephone and in-person follow-up, patients' understanding of their condition(s) and medication(s) using the Care Transitions Measure, and high-risk medication discrepancies.
A total of 347 non-VA acute care encounters were included and assigned: 159 to HIE plus CTI and 188 to HIE alone. Veterans were 76.9 years old on average, 98.5% male, 67.8% White, 17.1% Black, and 15.1% other (including Hispanic). There was no difference in 90-day hospital admission or readmission between the HIE-plus-CTI and HIE-alone groups (25.8% vs. 20.2%, respectively; risk diff 5.6%; 95% CI - 3.3 to 14.5%, p = .25). There was also no difference in secondary outcomes.
A care transitions intervention did not improve outcomes for veterans after a non-VA acute care encounter, as compared with HIE notification alone. Additional research is warranted to identify transitions services across systems that are implementable and could improve outcomes.
当患者经历跨系统急性护理时,健康信息交换 (HIE) 通知提供了一个提供及时过渡干预的机会,以改善系统间的护理。
比较 HIE 通知后进行医院后护理过渡干预 (CTI) 与仅 HIE 通知。
以初级保健团队为单位的集群随机对照试验,组分配。
2016 年至 2019 年间在 2 家 VA 设施接受初级保健且在非 VA 医院就诊或急诊就诊的 65 岁或以上的退伍军人。
对于所有受试者,实时 HIE 通知非 VA 急性护理遭遇发送到 VA 初级保健提供者。被分配到 HIE 加 CTI 的受试者在回家后 30 天内接受 VA 社会工作者的家访和电话访问,重点是患者激活、药物和病情知识、以患者为中心的记录保存和随访。
主要结果:90 天内住院或再入院。
急诊就诊、VA 初级保健团队及时电话和面对面随访、患者使用护理过渡措施了解其病情和药物情况、高风险药物差异。
共纳入并分配了 347 例非 VA 急性护理遭遇:159 例接受 HIE 加 CTI,188 例接受 HIE 单独治疗。退伍军人的平均年龄为 76.9 岁,98.5%为男性,67.8%为白人,17.1%为黑人,15.1%为其他(包括西班牙裔)。HIE 加 CTI 组和 HIE 单独组 90 天内住院或再入院率无差异(分别为 25.8%和 20.2%;风险差 5.6%;95%CI-3.3 至 14.5%,p=.25)。次要结局也没有差异。
与仅 HIE 通知相比,护理过渡干预并未改善退伍军人非 VA 急性护理后的结局。需要进一步研究确定可实施并改善结果的跨系统过渡服务。