Boockvar Kenneth S, Ho William, Pruskowski Jennifer, DiPalo Katherine E, Wong Jane J, Patel Jessica, Nebeker Jonathan R, Kaushal Rainu, Hung William
Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Pharmacy Department, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1095-1101. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx044.
To determine the effect of health information exchange (HIE) on medication prescribing for hospital inpatients in a cluster-randomized controlled trial, and to examine the prescribing effect of availability of information from a large pharmacy insurance plan in a natural experiment.
Patients admitted to an urban hospital received structured medication reconciliation by an intervention pharmacist with (intervention) or without (control) access to a regional HIE. The HIE contained prescribing information from the largest hospitals and pharmacy insurance plan in the region for the first 10 months of the study, but only from the hospitals for the last 21 months, when data charges were imposed by the insurance plan. The primary endpoint was discrepancies between preadmission and inpatient medication regimens, and secondary endpoints included adverse drug events (ADEs) and proportions of rectified discrepancies.
Overall, 186 and 195 patients were assigned to intervention and control, respectively. Patients were 60 years old on average and took a mean of 7 medications before admission. There was no difference between intervention and control in number of risk-weighted discrepancies (6.4 vs 5.8, P = .452), discrepancy-associated ADEs (0.102 vs 0.092 per admission, P = .964), or rectification of discrepancies (0.026 vs 0.036 per opportunity, P = .539). However, patients who received medication reconciliation with pharmacy insurance data available had more risk-weighted medication discrepancies identified than those who received usual care (8.0 vs 5.9, P = .038).
HIE may improve outcomes of medication reconciliation. Charging for access to medication information interrupts this effect. Efforts are needed to understand and increase prescribers' rectification of medication discrepancies.
在一项整群随机对照试验中确定健康信息交换(HIE)对医院住院患者用药处方的影响,并在一项自然实验中检验来自大型药房保险计划的信息可用性的处方效果。
入住一家城市医院的患者由一名干预药剂师进行结构化用药核对,干预组药剂师可以(干预组)或无法(对照组)访问区域HIE。在研究的前10个月,HIE包含该地区最大医院和药房保险计划的处方信息,但在保险计划开始收取数据费用后的最后21个月,仅包含医院的处方信息。主要终点是入院前和住院用药方案之间的差异,次要终点包括药物不良事件(ADEs)和差异纠正比例。
总体而言,分别有186名和195名患者被分配到干预组和对照组。患者平均年龄为60岁,入院前平均服用7种药物。干预组和对照组在风险加权差异数量(6.4对5.8,P = 0.452)、差异相关的ADEs(每次入院0.102对0.092,P = 0.964)或差异纠正方面(每次机会0.026对0.036,P = 0.539)没有差异。然而,在可获得药房保险数据的情况下接受用药核对的患者比接受常规护理的患者识别出更多的风险加权用药差异(8.0对5.9,P = 0.038)。
HIE可能改善用药核对的结果。获取用药信息收费会中断这种效果。需要努力了解并增加开处方者对用药差异的纠正。