Suppr超能文献

引入数据费用时,健康信息交换对药物差异识别的影响会受到干扰:一项整群随机对照试验的结果

Effect of health information exchange on recognition of medication discrepancies is interrupted when data charges are introduced: results of a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Boockvar Kenneth S, Ho William, Pruskowski Jennifer, DiPalo Katherine E, Wong Jane J, Patel Jessica, Nebeker Jonathan R, Kaushal Rainu, Hung William

机构信息

Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Pharmacy Department, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1095-1101. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx044.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of health information exchange (HIE) on medication prescribing for hospital inpatients in a cluster-randomized controlled trial, and to examine the prescribing effect of availability of information from a large pharmacy insurance plan in a natural experiment.

METHODS

Patients admitted to an urban hospital received structured medication reconciliation by an intervention pharmacist with (intervention) or without (control) access to a regional HIE. The HIE contained prescribing information from the largest hospitals and pharmacy insurance plan in the region for the first 10 months of the study, but only from the hospitals for the last 21 months, when data charges were imposed by the insurance plan. The primary endpoint was discrepancies between preadmission and inpatient medication regimens, and secondary endpoints included adverse drug events (ADEs) and proportions of rectified discrepancies.

RESULTS

Overall, 186 and 195 patients were assigned to intervention and control, respectively. Patients were 60 years old on average and took a mean of 7 medications before admission. There was no difference between intervention and control in number of risk-weighted discrepancies (6.4 vs 5.8, P = .452), discrepancy-associated ADEs (0.102 vs 0.092 per admission, P = .964), or rectification of discrepancies (0.026 vs 0.036 per opportunity, P = .539). However, patients who received medication reconciliation with pharmacy insurance data available had more risk-weighted medication discrepancies identified than those who received usual care (8.0 vs 5.9, P = .038).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

HIE may improve outcomes of medication reconciliation. Charging for access to medication information interrupts this effect. Efforts are needed to understand and increase prescribers' rectification of medication discrepancies.

摘要

目的

在一项整群随机对照试验中确定健康信息交换(HIE)对医院住院患者用药处方的影响,并在一项自然实验中检验来自大型药房保险计划的信息可用性的处方效果。

方法

入住一家城市医院的患者由一名干预药剂师进行结构化用药核对,干预组药剂师可以(干预组)或无法(对照组)访问区域HIE。在研究的前10个月,HIE包含该地区最大医院和药房保险计划的处方信息,但在保险计划开始收取数据费用后的最后21个月,仅包含医院的处方信息。主要终点是入院前和住院用药方案之间的差异,次要终点包括药物不良事件(ADEs)和差异纠正比例。

结果

总体而言,分别有186名和195名患者被分配到干预组和对照组。患者平均年龄为60岁,入院前平均服用7种药物。干预组和对照组在风险加权差异数量(6.4对5.8,P = 0.452)、差异相关的ADEs(每次入院0.102对0.092,P = 0.964)或差异纠正方面(每次机会0.026对0.036,P = 0.539)没有差异。然而,在可获得药房保险数据的情况下接受用药核对的患者比接受常规护理的患者识别出更多的风险加权用药差异(8.0对5.9,P = 0.038)。

讨论与结论

HIE可能改善用药核对的结果。获取用药信息收费会中断这种效果。需要努力了解并增加开处方者对用药差异的纠正。

相似文献

5
Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.减少医院环境中成人的用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 25;11(11):CD009985. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009985.pub2.

引用本文的文献

6
Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings.减少医院环境中成人的用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 25;11(11):CD009985. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009985.pub2.
10
A systematic literature review of LASA error interventions.对LASA错误干预措施的系统文献综述。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Feb;87(2):336-351. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14644. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

6
Medication reconciliation: A qualitative analysis of clinicians' perceptions.药物重整:临床医生认知的定性分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Jul-Aug;9(4):419-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验