Division of Vascular Surgery, University of California at Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 129263University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2022 May;56(4):376-384. doi: 10.1177/15385744211037616. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
Iliac artery anatomy can have a dramatic impact on the success of endovascular complex aortic aneurysm (CAA) procedures as endograft delivery systems need to be advanced and manipulated through these access vessels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of iliac artery conduits with emphasizes on open vs endovascular conduits performed to facilitate CAA endovascular repair.
All patients who had open or endovascular iliac conduits prior to endovascular CAA repair to treat thoracoabdominal, juxtarenal, or suprarenal aneurysms at the University of Colorado Hospital from January 2009 through January 2019 were included. Patients who presented with symptomatic or ruptured aortic aneurysms were excluded. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complications and mortality in patients undergoing iliac conduits.
Twenty-seven patients with a total of 42 conduits were included in the study. The majority of patients ( = 15, 56%) were female and the average age was 72 ± 9 years. The calculated VQI cardiac index was .6% (range, .3%-.8%). Eighteen (43%) endovascular and 24 (57%) open iliac conduits were performed during the study period. Thirty (71%) conduits were performed in a staged fashion, while 12 (29%) were performed at the same time as endovascular CAA repair. The mean time between conduit and definitive aneurysm repair surgery was 130 ± 68 days in the endovascular and 107 ± 79 days in the open groups ( = .87). No aneurysm rupture occurred during the staging period in either group. The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 18 ± 22 months. The median length of hospital stay for patients undergoing endovascular and open ICs was 6 (ranging, 1-28 days) and 7 days (ranging, 3-18 days), respectively. Patients undergoing open conduits had significantly more complications than those undergoing endovascular conduit (endoconduit) creation. A total of 4 (15%) patients died within 30 days after aneurysm repair. Out of 23 survivors, 18 (78%) patients were discharged home, 4 (18%) patients were discharged to a skilled nursing facility, and 1 (4%) patient was discharged to an acute rehabilitation facility. No mortality difference based on type of conduit was found.
Overall complication rate associated with creation of open iliac artery conduits is not negligible. Endoconduits, which carry less morbidity than open conduits, are preferred as a first-line adjunctive access procedure to facilitate complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
髂动脉解剖结构对腔内复杂主动脉瘤(CAA)手术的成功有显著影响,因为移植物输送系统需要通过这些入路血管推进和操作。本研究旨在评估开放与腔内髂动脉旁路手术的结果,重点是为方便 CAA 腔内修复而进行的旁路手术。
所有在科罗拉多大学医院接受腔内 CAA 修复以治疗胸腹主动脉、肾下或肾上动脉瘤的患者,在 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月期间均接受了开放或腔内髂动脉旁路手术。排除因症状性或破裂性主动脉瘤而就诊的患者。本研究的主要观察指标为接受髂动脉旁路手术患者的术后并发症和死亡率。
本研究共纳入 27 例患者,共 42 条旁路血管。大多数患者(=15,56%)为女性,平均年龄为 72±9 岁。计算的 VQI 心指数为 0.6%(范围为 0.3%-0.8%)。研究期间共进行了 18 例(43%)腔内和 24 例(57%)开放髂动脉旁路手术。30 例(71%)旁路血管在分期进行,12 例(29%)与 CAA 腔内修复同时进行。腔内组和开放组之间,旁路和确定性动脉瘤修复手术之间的平均时间分别为 130±68 天和 107±79 天(=0.87)。两组在分期期间均未发生动脉瘤破裂。整个队列的中位随访时间为 18±22 个月。接受腔内和开放 ICs 治疗的患者的中位住院时间分别为 6 天(范围为 1-28 天)和 7 天(范围为 3-18 天)。接受开放旁路手术的患者比接受腔内旁路手术的患者发生并发症的风险显著更高。术后 30 天内共有 4 例(15%)患者死亡。23 例存活患者中,18 例(78%)患者出院回家,4 例(18%)患者出院至护理院,1 例(4%)患者出院至急性康复机构。未发现基于旁路血管类型的死亡率差异。
开放髂动脉旁路手术相关的总体并发症发生率不容忽视。腔内旁路手术作为一种辅助腔内主动脉瘤修复的首选入路方法,其发病率低于开放旁路手术。