Luthra Atul Sunny, Gao Raymond LinBin, Remers Shannon, Carducci Peter, Sue Joanna
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8M 1W9, Canada.
St. Peters Hospital, Hamilton, ON L8M 1W9, Canada.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2022 Jan 26;7(1):14. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics7010014.
The LuBAIR™ Paradigm is a novel approach to ascribe meaning to behavioral expressions in advanced neurocognitive disorders when the reliability of a clinical assessment is limited. The meaning ascribed to each behavioral category was used to identify those which are likely to respond to the use of atypical antipsychotics, in their management. De-prescribing was attempted on patients who qualified to enter this retrospective study. De-prescribing was defined as successful if individuals were completely withdrawn from AAP and remained off them for 60 days, without the re-emergence of behaviors. The LuBAIR™ Inventory was filled on two occasions. The data collected on the second occasion, in the successful and failed de-prescribed groups, were compared in this retrospective study. MANOVA, Chi-Square paired -test statistical analyses were used to detect the differences in the behavioral categories between the two cohorts. Cohen d was used to measure effect size. Patients who did not have Mis-Identification and Goal-Directed Expressions were more likely to successfully de-prescribe: X2 (1, = 40) = 29.119 < 0.0001 and X2 (1, = 40) = 32.374, < 0.0001, respectively. Alternatively, the same behavioral categories were more likely to be present in patients who failed de-prescribing: MANOVA and paired -test ( < 0.0001). Atypical antipsychotics, in their role as an antipsychotic and mood stabilizer, may be used to manage Mis-Identification and Goal-Directed Expressions, respectively.
当临床评估的可靠性有限时,LuBAIR™范式是一种赋予晚期神经认知障碍行为表达意义的新方法。赋予每个行为类别的意义用于识别那些在管理中可能对使用非典型抗精神病药物有反应的行为。对符合进入这项回顾性研究条件的患者尝试减药。如果个体完全停用抗精神病药物并在60天内未再出现相关行为,则减药被定义为成功。两次填写LuBAIR™量表。在这项回顾性研究中,比较了成功减药组和减药失败组第二次收集的数据。使用多变量方差分析、卡方配对检验统计分析来检测两组之间行为类别上的差异。使用科恩d值来衡量效应大小。没有错误识别和目标导向表达的患者更有可能成功减药:卡方检验(1,n = 40)= 29.119,p < 0.0001和卡方检验(1,n = 40)= 32.374,p < 0.0001,分别。或者,相同的行为类别更有可能出现在减药失败的患者中:多变量方差分析和配对检验(p < 0.0001)。非典型抗精神病药物作为抗精神病药和情绪稳定剂,可能分别用于处理错误识别和目标导向表达。