Suppr超能文献

可穿戴眼压计、光电容积脉搏波描记法和心电图在动态环境下无袖带血压测量的比较。

A Comparison of Wearable Tonometry, Photoplethysmography, and Electrocardiography for Cuffless Measurement of Blood Pressure in an Ambulatory Setting.

出版信息

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2022 Jul;26(7):2864-2875. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3153259. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While non-invasive, cuffless blood pressure (BP) measurement has demonstrated relevancy in controlled environments, ambulatory measurement is important for hypertension diagnosis and control. We present both in-lab and ambulatory BP estimation results from a diverse cohort of participants.

METHODS

Participants (N=1125, aged 21-85, 49.2% female, multiple hypertensive categories) had BP measured in-lab over a 24-hour period with a subset also receiving ambulatory measurements. Radial tonometry, photoplethysmography (PPG), electrocardiography (ECG), and accelerometry signals were collected simultaneously with auscultatory or oscillometric references for systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Predictive models to estimate BP using a variety of sensor-based feature groups were evaluated against challenging baselines.

RESULTS

Despite limited availability, tonometry-derived features showed superior performance compared to other feature groups and baselines, yieldingprediction errors of 0.32 ±9.8 mmHg SBP and 0.54 ±7.7 mmHg DBP in-lab, and 0.86 ±8.7 mmHg SBP and 0.75 ±5.9 mmHg DBP for 24-hour averages. SBP error standard deviation (SD) was reduced in normotensive (in-lab: 8.1 mmHg, 24-hr: 7.2 mmHg) and younger (in-lab: 7.8 mmHg, 24-hr: 6.7 mmHg) subpopulations. SBP SD was further reduced 15-20% when constrained to the calibration posture alone.

CONCLUSION

Performance for normotensive and younger participants was superior to the general population across all feature groups. Reference type, posture relative to calibration, and controlled vs. ambulatory setting all impacted BP errors.

SIGNIFICANCE

Results highlight the need for demographically diverse populations and challenging evaluation settings for BP estimation studies. We present the first public dataset of ambulatory tonometry and cuffless BP over a 24-hour period to aid in future cardiovascular research.

摘要

目的

虽然无袖带血压(BP)测量在受控环境中具有相关性,但动态测量对于高血压的诊断和控制很重要。我们呈现了来自不同人群的实验室和动态 BP 估计结果。

方法

参与者(N=1125,年龄 21-85 岁,49.2%为女性,有多种高血压类别)在 24 小时内通过实验室进行 BP 测量,其中一部分还接受了动态测量。同时采集了桡动脉张力测量法、光体积描记法(PPG)、心电图(ECG)和加速度计信号,并与听诊或振荡法参考值进行比较,以测量收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。使用各种基于传感器的特征组来估计 BP 的预测模型与具有挑战性的基线进行了评估。

结果

尽管可用数据有限,但张力测量法得出的特征表现优于其他特征组和基线,在实验室中,SBP 的预测误差为 0.32±9.8mmHg,DBP 的预测误差为 0.54±7.7mmHg;24 小时平均值时,SBP 的预测误差为 0.86±8.7mmHg,DBP 的预测误差为 0.75±5.9mmHg。在正常血压(实验室:8.1mmHg,24 小时:7.2mmHg)和年轻(实验室:7.8mmHg,24 小时:6.7mmHg)人群中,SBP 误差标准差(SD)降低。仅在校准姿势下,SBP SD 进一步降低 15-20%。

结论

在所有特征组中,正常血压和年轻参与者的表现均优于一般人群。参考类型、相对于校准的姿势、以及受控与动态设置均对 BP 误差产生影响。

意义

结果强调了 BP 估计研究需要具有多样化的人口统计学特征和具有挑战性的评估环境。我们提供了第一个 24 小时动态张力测量法和无袖带 BP 的公共数据集,以帮助未来的心血管研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验